Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
2 small blocks or 1 big block >

2 small blocks or 1 big block

Notices

2 small blocks or 1 big block

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-11-2011, 03:09 PM
  #51  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have heard that singles are a little better balanced, but Wife + Kids + open ocean + twin 350 Mag = Peace of mind.

mobuzz is offline  
Old 03-11-2011, 03:20 PM
  #52  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 6,384
Received 283 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

I think the balance of a single engine is a catch 22. Obviously the rear of a twin is heavier, but the torque steer you get with a single can make the boat land on its side when it launches and will have a tendency to not run level. You will alway be messing with the tabs just to get it to drive level. In a twin, your just pointing the nose up or down. In a single your doing the same, but your also trying to get it level.

Were is that kryptonite video mastercraft posted. Watch when it launches the boat dipped to the starboard or port (can't remember) he didn't come down flat. I have had numerous bad landings trying to manage the torque steer of my old 24 python, which is why I sold it. The twin engine boat I have now is 5 times easier to drive, granted it doesn't have a pad bottom like the 24, but it was the torque steer that drove me nuts. Why do you think mercury made a special NXT drive just for single engine boats?

Last edited by TexomaPowerboater; 03-11-2011 at 03:22 PM.
TexomaPowerboater is offline  
Old 03-11-2011, 03:28 PM
  #53  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Erie, PA US
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=TexomaPowerboater;3348219]I think the balance of a single engine is a catch 22. Obviously the rear of a twin is heavier, but the torque steer you get with a single can make the boat land on its side when it launches and will have a tendency to not run level. You will alway be messing with the tabs just to get it to drive level. In a twin, your just pointing the nose up or down. In a single your doing the same, but your also trying to get it level.QUOTE]

You hit the nail on the head with the torque steer. Plus i think the twins being a little heavier; give you a little softer ride in the rough.
Chris is offline  
Old 03-11-2011, 04:33 PM
  #54  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 6,384
Received 283 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Also, the fuel savings on a single engine boat vs a twin is not much. I would venture to say that a twin engine boat will use only 10-20% more fuel than a single at cruising speeds. That is because it takes 4000rpm on a single to do what 3000 rpm does for a twin application. Once you get past 3000-3200rpm the fuel consumption increases dramatically. This is also why the twin setup is often more reliable and can have more hours before rebuild.

Of course if you drive WOT all the time these facts go right out the window.
TexomaPowerboater is offline  
Old 03-11-2011, 07:38 PM
  #55  
JC Performance Engines
Gold Member
 
Stormrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,891
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mobuzz
I have heard that singles are a little better balanced, but Wife + Kids + open ocean + twin 350 Mag = Peace of mind.

OHHHHHH.... so that is where the other twin SBC Savage is.
Stormrider is offline  
Old 03-11-2011, 07:42 PM
  #56  
JC Performance Engines
Gold Member
 
Stormrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,891
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TexomaPowerboater
I think the balance of a single engine is a catch 22. Obviously the rear of a twin is heavier, but the torque steer you get with a single can make the boat land on its side when it launches and will have a tendency to not run level. You will alway be messing with the tabs just to get it to drive level. In a twin, your just pointing the nose up or down. In a single your doing the same, but your also trying to get it level.

Were is that kryptonite video mastercraft posted. Watch when it launches the boat dipped to the starboard or port (can't remember) he didn't come down flat. I have had numerous bad landings trying to manage the torque steer of my old 24 python, which is why I sold it. The twin engine boat I have now is 5 times easier to drive, granted it doesn't have a pad bottom like the 24, but it was the torque steer that drove me nuts. Why do you think mercury made a special NXT drive just for single engine boats?
Tex, imo... your best post ever!
Stormrider is offline  
Old 03-11-2011, 10:20 PM
  #57  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
rchevelle71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Boca Raton
Posts: 7,392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by FunHome
My 28ft Saber with twin built small blocks (470hp) out ran and out accelerated single big block boats when we raced in P4.
And the balance was great!!
Heck it even beat a few twin big block boats!!
Oh and this is a Old School straight bottom...
Great boat, 470HP, I seem to remember for you hunting for a drive a time or 2
rchevelle71 is offline  
Old 03-11-2011, 11:24 PM
  #58  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TexomaPowerboater
I think the balance of a single engine is a catch 22. Obviously the rear of a twin is heavier, but the torque steer you get with a single can make the boat land on its side when it launches and will have a tendency to not run level. You will alway be messing with the tabs just to get it to drive level. In a twin, your just pointing the nose up or down. In a single your doing the same, but your also trying to get it level.

Were is that kryptonite video mastercraft posted. Watch when it launches the boat dipped to the starboard or port (can't remember) he didn't come down flat. I have had numerous bad landings trying to manage the torque steer of my old 24 python, which is why I sold it. The twin engine boat I have now is 5 times easier to drive, granted it doesn't have a pad bottom like the 24, but it was the torque steer that drove me nuts. Why do you think mercury made a special NXT drive just for single engine boats?


You are right the balance is a catch 22.
However - lighter is always better.

The singles do torque steer but a really good fully hydraulic steering system will minimize this - but it's its still there.

The original NXT "single skeg" was a disaster, and Merc changed it due to handling issues shortly after introduction.

Thing is ...small block parts - like exhaust systems aren't any cheaper than big block parts, and if you put in 2 potent small blocks you will spend very nearly if not more than what you will on big blocks on an HP to HP basis. The small block guy will still have a much harder time finding parts.

( I know because I built, and still own a potent small block boat)

So in a sense a good twin small block boat might as well be twin big blocks from a maintenance, cost and parts availability perspective.

True the small blocks are easier on the drives than the BB's.

From my ownership perpective having built both - the realistic choice is really a single BB or twin BB's.


Uncle Dave
Uncle Dave is offline  
Old 03-12-2011, 05:14 AM
  #59  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 373
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Dave
You are right the balance is a catch 22.
However - lighter is always better.

The singles do torque steer but a really good fully hydraulic steering system will minimize this - but it's its still there.

The original NXT "single skeg" was a disaster, and Merc changed it due to handling issues shortly after introduction.

Thing is ...small block parts - like exhaust systems aren't any cheaper than big block parts, and if you put in 2 potent small blocks you will spend very nearly if not more than what you will on big blocks on an HP to HP basis. The small block guy will still have a much harder time finding parts.

( I know because I built, and still own a potent small block boat)

So in a sense a good twin small block boat might as well be twin big blocks from a maintenance, cost and parts availability perspective.

True the small blocks are easier on the drives than the BB's.

From my ownership perpective having built both - the realistic choice is really a single BB or twin BB's.


Uncle Dave

Do you think 2 BB's will fit in the engine room of a Scarab 29 ?

Hydraulic steering does nothing to counteract the torque from a single propeller.

If we consider stock power you could compare stock 350 Mag MPIs (300 HP) to eg. a HP500, my guess is that most likely you will get many more hours out of the small blocks without any need to rebuild anything compared to a HP500.

If you want a lot more horsepower out of a stock setup I agree BB is the way to go.
Phazar454Mag is offline  
Old 03-12-2011, 09:13 AM
  #60  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Phazar454Mag
Do you think 2 BB's will fit in the engine room of a Scarab 29 ?
Scarab 29 beam is 7' 6".
ECeptor is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.