|
Originally Posted by kap328
(Post 3498345)
Comment:
Can you be more specific on this FOAC vs. MOAC. 1. Temperature reductions. 2. Power Differences 3. Intended applications I assume this is for a new and larger Whipple compressor....or plural. Quad Rotor 4.0 or the newest version...etc. Is this a rebuildable unit purpose of the assembled core? Is Whipple now making your own intercoolers? or still third party supplier? colors? Uhhh! that should be enough to talk about. |
Good grief! A split case...I'm sure that magic trick has been performed on more than just a cooler. Dustin Whipple is a powerboater himself & is constantly putting out great products for Offshore Powerboater consumption. Let's enjoy them....shall we?
Oh look....a round wheel....with only 47 nail holes in it! Bet that hasn't been done before!!!! LOL! |
Originally Posted by Comanche3Six
(Post 3498800)
Good grief! A split case...I'm sure that magic trick has been performed on more than just a cooler. Dustin Whipple is a powerboater himself & is constantly putting out great products for Offshore Powerboater consumption. Let's enjoy them....shall we?
Oh look....a round wheel....with only 47 nail holes in it! Bet that hasn't been done before!!!! LOL! I just think it's funny how several weeks after we released our model, he followed suit with the same concept (his thread was deleted back in Dec). It's a great way to manfacture the unit as it reduces the cost. I don't blame him for following suit. |
Originally Posted by Coolerman
(Post 3498804)
I never disputed the fact that whipple makes a great product. Dustin is obviously a brilliant person with his abilities to crack ecu codes and to make complete kits for the marine and automotive world.
I just think it's funny how several weeks after we released our model, he followed suit with the same concept (his thread was deleted back in Dec). It's a great way to manfacture the unit as it reduces the cost. I don't blame him for following suit. |
Originally Posted by Coolerman
(Post 3498799)
I would be interested in what the pressure drop of the tall core is for turbocharged or centrifugal blowers (non positive displacement boost)?
A lot of engineering thats for sure! I like the question very poignant... good stuff to know. KAP |
Very nice
|
Originally Posted by Whipple Charged
(Post 3498410)
Re-invent? hmm, lets see, we were the first to bring the MOAC and the Double, so the FOAC is in fact new, bigger, and better for the one's who are going for all out power.
|
Originally Posted by Coolerman
(Post 3498896)
Just fyi, Lucky from New Century built the first double core for Dave Scott.
|
Originally Posted by endeavor1
(Post 3498771)
Dustin,
It just looks eerily similar to the one that PF marine designed. As mentioned before, what will the major differences be over the MOAC and dual core. Can you answer KAP's questions as to let us all know. Thanks and continued success. A casted housing is in the works, billet is temporary, as was on our double version. Its funny some act as if we didn't bring the unique version of the CuNi intercoolers to the high performance marine market. Who do you think took that to Mercury Racing and got them using them as replacements for 900SC's and OEM equipment for the 600/662/700/850/1075/1200? |
Originally Posted by Coolerman
(Post 3498804)
I never disputed the fact that whipple makes a great product. Dustin is obviously a brilliant person with his abilities to crack ecu codes and to make complete kits for the marine and automotive world.
I just think it's funny how several weeks after we released our model, he followed suit with the same concept (his thread was deleted back in Dec). It's a great way to manfacture the unit as it reduces the cost. I don't blame him for following suit. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.