Notices

Arnesons vs. #6?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-08-2011, 06:52 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
KNOT-RIGHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Providence,RI
Posts: 3,359
Received 156 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Shaft drives are much more efficient.
Arneson
Bpm
Trimax.

Strong simple and reliable.
KNOT-RIGHT is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 07:08 PM
  #12  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Steve 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KNOT-RIGHT
Shaft drives are much more efficient.
Arneson
Bpm
Trimax.

Strong simple and reliable.
And Lighter.
Steve 1 is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 07:10 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Here and There
Posts: 1,871
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I don't have 6's but I'd love to switch over to the asd's. One less thing to worry about.
baywatch is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 07:28 PM
  #14  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Jassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,397
Received 31 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by baywatch
I don't have 6's but I'd love to switch over to the asd's. One less thing to worry about.
the 38 asd Hustler I drove back to back bravo boat was great. It actually docked better, steered about the same..but took about 2 seconds longer to plane up..once it hooked up it took off..you felt comfortable pushing the throttles foward, faster as it accelerated quicker..the fear factor of blowing up was removed..just my .02..
Jassman is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 07:54 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

No bevel gears in an Arneson, that's a good thing!

Jeff

Last edited by hallj; 11-08-2011 at 07:57 PM.
hallj is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:07 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anybody done a side by side comparison between ASD's vs. XR or #6, same boat same power etc... It would be interesting to get real world numbers on speed, acceleration time and so on.

i.e. 42 Fountain with twin 700's. 1 with NXT vs. ASD 8 top speed comparrison?
Racerngr1 is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 10:13 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
JasonSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 4,333
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Racerngr1
Has anybody done a side by side comparison between ASD's vs. XR or #6, same boat same power etc... It would be interesting to get real world numbers on speed, acceleration time and so on.

i.e. 42 Fountain with twin 700's. 1 with NXT vs. ASD 8 top speed comparrison?
You won't find a 42' Fountain with NXT drives. You'll fing them with NXT transom assemblies & #6 drives, but not NXT drives.
The test infor is out there. Powerboat has tested the 42 with ASD 7's or 8's with Ilmor power and they've tested the 42 with everything from 4.3 V6's (not really) to 1075+hp on #6's. Someone just needs to do the legwork to get the info pushed out.
JasonSmith is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 11:15 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denmark and hopefully some place nice
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Racerngr1
Has anybody done a side by side comparison between ASD's vs. XR or #6, same boat same power etc... It would be interesting to get real world numbers on speed, acceleration time and so on.

i.e. 42 Fountain with twin 700's. 1 with NXT vs. ASD 8 top speed comparrison?
The XR is not even in this league. There is no doubt that the ASD and #6 are much more efficient and stronger than any tyoe of XR. That being a stcok XR or one of the aftermarket drives from IMCO, Bmax, Konrad ect. This has been proven more than once. Many Bravo conversions with the XR to ASD#7M see speed increase up to 10+ mph. In cases with drives that are heavier to spin and has more drag, it's even more. On some applications with fx cat's the speed increase would be even bigger. These are not only top end numbers, the cruise speed efficiensy goes way up as well.

Back on topic.

Last edited by A.O. Razor; 11-08-2011 at 11:22 PM.
A.O. Razor is offline  
Old 11-09-2011, 08:19 AM
  #19  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Point Pleasant/Demarest NJ
Posts: 1,100
Received 36 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

I have a 32 Skater with Arnesons. Boat runs extremely well. Boat has 580 ci normally aspirated. Arnesons or number 6 are both nice.

The number 6 has a monel shaft. It rusts after 2 seasons and you get water in the oil in salt water. The Arneson is stainless prop shaft. You have splay weld a stainless collar or replace the number 6 prop shafts every few years. Salt water is harsh.
Pro1 is offline  
Old 11-09-2011, 10:52 AM
  #20  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Indianapolis, Lake Cumberland
Posts: 3,903
Received 341 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

They look awesome!!!
Attached Thumbnails Arnesons vs. #6?-74-1.jpg  
Marginmn is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.