Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Can a cat boat be built with a blow out hinge flap to prevent a blow over? >

Can a cat boat be built with a blow out hinge flap to prevent a blow over?

Notices

Can a cat boat be built with a blow out hinge flap to prevent a blow over?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-11-2011, 12:53 PM
  #81  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didn't say it was useless. I said I didn't see a reason for crumple zones.
Please enlighten me of the benefits?

I also wonder if a experienced racer and boat designer automatically becomes a good safety engineer?

Is there any photos of the new MIT safety cockpit?

Last edited by Gripenland; 11-11-2011 at 01:17 PM. Reason: Added some more questions
Gripenland is offline  
Old 11-11-2011, 01:12 PM
  #82  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LITCHFIELD,IL.
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gripenland
I didn't say it was useless. I said I didn't see a reason for crumple zones.
Please enlighten me of the benefits?
TO CRUMPLE
schnydo is offline  
Old 11-11-2011, 01:13 PM
  #83  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Wink

If as many race boats do, the boat rolls instead of blow over or does an end to end swap as many times occurs in crashes this type of device might not solve all the problems as neither would a air release flap only So the Need for Roll Protection structure and reinforcement or Crumple Zones will many times be needed. As it is usually occurs in lots of crashes the type of control loss does always foretell the injuries or severity of injuries to the occupants.

Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Raylar is offline  
Old 11-11-2011, 01:19 PM
  #84  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by schnydo
TO CRUMPLE
I see
Gripenland is offline  
Old 11-11-2011, 10:33 PM
  #85  
Registered
 
PhantomChaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bell Canyon, CA
Posts: 12,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by schnydo
TO CRUMPLE
Nice way to discuss.
PhantomChaos is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 01:18 AM
  #86  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
WildThing47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CT, FL
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this is an insult to the lives lost in this weekend's events...we had people lose their lives doing what they love, do not make jokes or go on about what YOU would've done to prevent it...it's in poor taste...god bless and take a moment of silence in your day to remember those who push the envelope , they sacrifice, we didn't, a post doesn't count....give some RESPECT
WildThing47 is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 06:09 AM
  #87  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: MIAMI, FL
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Catamaran aerodynamics

When the boats finally got past 100, Cougar spent some time on the subject. Back then we had rules which kept engine HP down to a reasonable level, since we had to go a couple of hundred miles sometimes. We built a new 38' aluminum cat for Ted Toleman to break the "Ton" (100 mph). It was the first cat with the last bottom panel parallel with the datum line, which allowed the boat to "trim" by rotating on its center of balance. It was possible to raise the bow without raising the entire boat. Still didn't make 100. We built a 12' wide, 4' long slot/flap, end plate NACA 29 aluminum wing to mount above the CG. We ran the boat at its best performance, 98 mph, with a broom stick with lints taped to it, and discovered that the lowest level of 'clean air' was 7 feet above the deck. We mounted the wing there, and set the wing at 3 degrees plus angle, and the flap at 20 added degrees, down. According to the NACA book, that wing would provide 1260 pounds of drag, and 4,400 pounds of lift. We considered supplying oxygen to Smitty and Ted for the record run, since they might not be able to breathe at those speeds. It ran 99. Sonny Levi, who has an aero degree allowed as how the only benefit of the wing was raising the drag center.

In my opinion (bear in mind that my earlier training was skipping flat rocks on the Wabash river), aerodynamics of a big fast cat 'in trouble' is more akin to ditching a plane than regaining any semblance of control, man, computer, automatic or whatever. Chris Hodges solved that problem a long time ago. CAPSULE.

Last edited by BROWNIE; 11-12-2011 at 09:02 AM.
BROWNIE is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 07:18 AM
  #88  
Registered
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarkston, Michigan
Posts: 5,825
Received 607 Likes on 275 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BROWNIE
When the boats finally got past 100, Cougar spent some time on the subject. Back then we had rules which kept engine HP down to a reasonable level, since we had to go a couple of hundred miles sometimes. We built a new 38' aluminum cat for Ted Toleman to break the "Ton" (100 mph). It was the first cat with the last bottom panel parallel with the datum line, which allowed the boat to "trim" by rotating on its center of balance. It was possible to raise the bow without raising the entire boat. Still didn't make 100. We built a 12' wide, 4' long slot/flap, end plate NACA 29 aluminum wing to mount above the CG. We ran the boat at its best performance, 98 mph, with a broom stick with lints taped to it, and discovered that the lowest level of 'clean air' was 7 feet above the deck. We mounted the wing there, and set the wing at 3 degrees plus angle, and the flap at 20 added degrees, down. According to the NACA book, that wing would provide 1260 pounds of drag, and 4,400 pounds of lift. We considered supplying oxygen to Smitty and Ted for the record run, since they might not be able to breathe at those speeds. It ran 99. Sonny Levi, who has an aero degree allowed as how the only benefit of the wing raising the drag center.

In my opinion (bear in mind that my earlier training was skipping flat rocks on the Wabash river), aerodynamics of a big fast cat 'in trouble' is more akin to ditching a plane than regaining any semblance of control, man, computer, automatic or whatever. Chris Hodges solved that problem a long time ago. CAPSULE.
There it is. From a boating legend. Great post.
thirdchildhood is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 09:02 AM
  #89  
Registered
 
PhantomChaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bell Canyon, CA
Posts: 12,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thirdchildhood
There it is. From a boating legend. Great post.
I agree. Great post. Thanks Brownie.
PhantomChaos is offline  
Old 11-12-2011, 09:04 AM
  #90  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ft. Lauderdale Florida & Tarpon Springs Florida
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not sure a wing would work as by the time it would work and take affect, the boat would be in position that is too late ..... I would think some sort of "blow out" hatch or flap that is in the middle of the hull. When the boat gets to that position the pressure of the air opens up the big flap and allows the air to go through the hull and not continue to lift it. This idea also may be too late for the boat to react ....
tanner is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.