Mercury Racing 1075-Powered 44 Outerlimits Hits 139 mph
#1
Correspondent
Correspondent
Thread Starter
Mercury Racing 1075-Powered 44 Outerlimits Hits 139 mph
With an owner who really gets it, http://speedonthewater.com/new-boats...s-138-mph.html.
Never interviewed a happier boat owner.
Never interviewed a happier boat owner.
Last edited by Matt Trulio; 12-22-2011 at 04:56 PM.
#2
Banned
With an owner who really gets it, http://speedonthewater.com/new-boats...s-138-mph.html.
Never interviewed a happier boat owner.
Never interviewed a happier boat owner.
’ I told Mike, (Fiore), ‘I’m so happy. God can take me now. I’m done.
VERY COOL sounds like mission accomplished
ROCK ON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ITS A SKATER NATION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAPPY CHRISTMAS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:bi gbird:
Last edited by RunninHotRacing163.1; 12-22-2011 at 09:23 PM.
#3
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Orangeville, ONT. CAN
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dave has been so excited to get this boat.......he has waited a long time and have enjoyed talking with him and listening to his enthusiasm along the way.
Congrats Davie
Jay
Congrats Davie
Jay
#5
Banned
He chose the discontinued 1075SCi engines because he felt they were appropriate for the boat and his needs.
Im not going to race this boatIm going to do poker runs, Scotto said. The 1075s are very reliable and my mechanic can fix them without any special tools. Plus, with a pair of 1350s the boat would be out of control, for me. Running almost 140 mph in a 44-footer is just fine."
He could have put the new 1100s in the boat. Turbos are easier on the engine than superchargers and would probly get better fuel mileage too. Why not go new tech just sayin'.
Im not going to race this boatIm going to do poker runs, Scotto said. The 1075s are very reliable and my mechanic can fix them without any special tools. Plus, with a pair of 1350s the boat would be out of control, for me. Running almost 140 mph in a 44-footer is just fine."
He could have put the new 1100s in the boat. Turbos are easier on the engine than superchargers and would probly get better fuel mileage too. Why not go new tech just sayin'.
#6
Registered
iTrader: (3)
He chose the discontinued 1075SCi engines because he felt they were appropriate for the boat and his needs.
Im not going to race this boatIm going to do poker runs, Scotto said. The 1075s are very reliable and my mechanic can fix them without any special tools. Plus, with a pair of 1350s the boat would be out of control, for me. Running almost 140 mph in a 44-footer is just fine."
He could have put the new 1100s in the boat. Turbos are easier on the engine than superchargers and would probly get better fuel mileage too. Why not go new tech just sayin'.
Im not going to race this boatIm going to do poker runs, Scotto said. The 1075s are very reliable and my mechanic can fix them without any special tools. Plus, with a pair of 1350s the boat would be out of control, for me. Running almost 140 mph in a 44-footer is just fine."
He could have put the new 1100s in the boat. Turbos are easier on the engine than superchargers and would probly get better fuel mileage too. Why not go new tech just sayin'.
#7
Registered
Its been a pleasure dealing with Dave throughout the entire build process of this boat. I dont think I've ever seen someone so excited to take delivery. Thanks for the story Matt.
Last edited by OL40SVX; 12-22-2011 at 10:50 PM.
#8
Banned
#9
Registered
Last edited by OL40SVX; 12-22-2011 at 10:51 PM.
#10
Diamond Member #001
Charter Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Coastal North Carolina
Posts: 4,808
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Back to the point: Doesn't the 725/Indy Ilmor boat run 120? Seems like another $210,000 worth of engines should give more than another 20 mph? No disrepect, it just seems like there should be a bigger difference in speed...
__________________
Retired! Boating full-time now.
Retired! Boating full-time now.
Last edited by C_Spray; 12-22-2011 at 10:01 PM.