![]() |
If it was me, id have ten and some sort of ballast tank. You NEED a 20 inch mid BTW. That is necessary.
|
I'd prefer tabs than ballast, both is even better. I have both, started with just 200L of ballast up front. After a season I got dana hp1100 tabs, man did it make a difference. The tabs work quick so you can change things at the drop of a hat, the ballast obviously takes a minute or so to fill and empty. I still like to throw a little ballast in if its the sort of water where you can run fast with trim but the boat is getting unsettled on some smaller waves.
30" shaft is way to long, as mentioned a 20" would be better. It's a wild looking setback you got on there now! All depends on the hull weight to say what setback would be ideal? |
actual it looks like a 25" engine. Although it will put the center of gravity higher you can mount a hydraulic jack plate on it and it would help the powerhead/transom clearance when it is in trailer trim. My 22 velocity had a 225 excel yamaha(more like a true 175 hp) on it and was able to spin a 23 raker prop for 64 mph. without triming the jack plate it would run 55 mph. http://miami.craigslist.org/mdc/boa/3618694826.html
|
Originally Posted by Kurt Hamilton
(Post 3881742)
I'd prefer tabs than ballast, both is even better. I have both, started with just 200L of ballast up front. After a season I got dana hp1100 tabs, man did it make a difference. The tabs work quick so you can change things at the drop of a hat, the ballast obviously takes a minute or so to fill and empty. I still like to throw a little ballast in if its the sort of water where you can run fast with trim but the boat is getting unsettled on some smaller waves.
30" shaft is way to long, as mentioned a 20" would be better. It's a wild looking setback you got on there now! All depends on the hull weight to say what setback would be ideal? |
Originally Posted by northernoffshore
(Post 3881759)
actual it looks like a 25" engine. Although it will put the center of gravity higher you can mount a hydraulic jack plate on it and it would help the powerhead/transom clearance when it is in trailer trim. My 22 velocity had a 225 excel yamaha(more like a true 175 hp) on it and was able to spin a 23 raker prop for 64 mph. without triming the jack plate it would run 55 mph. http://miami.craigslist.org/mdc/boa/3618694826.html
|
Originally Posted by gregga
(Post 3881651)
Forgot to mention its a 30" shaft...
|
Here's what a 25" mid-section looks like on my 1992 Mercury 200:
http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e6...dMotorLeft.jpg |
Originally Posted by Too Stroked
(Post 3882007)
Here's what a 25" mid-section looks like on my 1992 Mercury 200:
http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e6...dMotorLeft.jpg |
Originally Posted by rchevelle71
(Post 3882049)
Cant click on your pic to blow it up, but it looks about the same distance from the lower mount to the cav plate as his. My guess is 25". If he is gonna run 10" setback, he may even want to go 20". Only problem with that is it actually will lower the powerhead, and give him more trouble with his trim issue.
|
Originally Posted by Too Stroked
(Post 3882050)
Sorry about the pic. Not sure what happened there. Kevin used to build all of the 22's with a small splash well like mine has. But this required a 25" mid-section so the cowl didn't hit when you trailered the motor up. He will make them now with a cut down transom that allows for the use of a 20" mid. Of course if you run enough setback, the cowl won't hit anything anyway.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.