Whipple Offers PCM Upgrades for Mercury 8.2 Engines
#22
Registered
For those of you that have committed to the upgrade do any of you own boats w/ Bravo 3's & the duo prop? I ask b/c I'm wondering whether the upgrade will require more prop in order to optimize. 4- B3 props wouldn't be cheap assuming you had twins.
Last edited by NASCAT; 03-28-2014 at 07:15 PM.
#23
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Chicora, Pa
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#25
Registered
Who offers the headers, what do they run & what are they claiming the gain will be? Or you can just quote how many $100's per HP, just curious if you don't mind sharing.
#26
Registered
This is a great question! I have a Formula 400ss with 8.2 HO's that would love more power! I would assume the axis system would be unaffected also?
#27
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Chicora, Pa
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I called mercury and Dustin at whipple today to try and find out about removing these cats because I want my PCM tuned for no cats. Well neither of them knew anything about it. Mercruiser actually thought I couldn't remove them abd that they were all one piece. Well i said heck with it and tore mine apart today. Just as I thought they slip right out from the bottom of the riser. There was 3 cats on each side. Here is a quick pick I snapped. The exhaust has to flow directly through the honey comb. [IMG][/IMG]
#30
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fresno, CA, 93722, USA
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
CMI 496 exhaust is a direct bolt on and better than stock. Stock has more tight bends and even without the cat, will not flow as much as the CMI.... Can't tell you the difference in power, we didn't test stock exhaust without cat.