Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
what are the pros and cons of triples versus double engines >

what are the pros and cons of triples versus double engines

Notices
General Boating Discussion

what are the pros and cons of triples versus double engines

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-09-2013 | 02:37 PM
  #21  
dkwestern's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Lake St. Clair
Default

Originally Posted by nkosi
Not necessarily. My trip O/B PowerPlay could not plane on two engines. I don't know if it was because of the drag of the third "dead" engine (my set up didn't allow me to tilt one engine out of the water on its own).
Originally Posted by Sydwayz
Did you try removing the "dead" prop?
I could plane my 33 PP with 2 engines, even dragging the 3rd prop. I ran 20 miles or so dragging the 3rd prop from Grand Haven to Holland in Lake Michigan.
I had less HP than nkosi as well.
dkwestern is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2013 | 03:08 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 456
Likes: 1
From: Central Square & Fishers Landing, 1000 Islands NY
Default

I agree on just the wow factor at the dock. People just look at you like you must own your own refinery. The other thing I like is that my 42 Fountain gets on plane with barely any throttle and zero tabs. It also stays up on plane at a lot less rpm than if it had twins. I didn't see a huge increase, if any, in the amount of fuel mine burns with triple 575 horse HP 500's vs. my old Formula with twin 502's.
1000 islander is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2013 | 04:06 PM
  #23  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 180
From: Indianapolis, IN/ Punta Gorda, FL
Default

I've got a picture somewhere of my smartcraft showing 200 gallons per hour while running wide open, I'll have to find it. And yes, boat can stay on plane at much slower speeds
PremierPOWER is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2013 | 04:39 PM
  #24  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,041
Likes: 712
From: Toledo Oh
Default

True there is one more motor and drive to service, but in my mind you are decreasing the stress on the components somewhat. You ever run out of gas as a kid? I bet it took a lot less work having 3 people pushing the car.
phragle is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2013 | 05:00 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 6
From: Long Island, NY
Default

The difference in maintenance costs are somewhat dependent on the boat and the different power options you would need in twins versus triples. For instance, in a 47 Fountain, you can go trip 525's but putting twins in that boat you would need big power and #6 drives which I would argue the maintenance on those would be more costly than the basic maintenance on 525's with bravos which are for the most part bulletproof (header issue notwithstanding). In fact, I'm really hoping I'm right on this theory because I just bought a trip 525 boat....
HyFive578 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2013 | 05:32 PM
  #26  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,989
Likes: 6,484
From: Chicago
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by PremierPOWER
Bling factor is another reason for triples over twins

[ATTACH=CONFIG]513925[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]513926[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]513927[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]513928[/ATTACH]

Man that thing is SICK!!!!!!!
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2013 | 05:53 PM
  #27  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 448
Likes: 6
From: Raystown Lake Pa
Default

Originally Posted by PremierPOWER
I've got a picture somewhere of my smartcraft showing 200 gallons per hour while running wide open, I'll have to find it. And yes, boat can stay on plane at much slower speeds
Just a quick caluclation based off your avatar... .6 MPG?? Not really that far out of line.
Scagburner is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2013 | 07:00 PM
  #28  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 266
Likes: 3
From: mchenry il
Default

I had a 33 power play with triple 2.5s the triples were so cool looks ,and sound
waycool marine is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2013 | 07:08 PM
  #29  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 595
Likes: 97
From: Hudson, IL
Default

I can get my Fountain on plane with a dead prop. It was a life saver this year at the shootout when I lost a sea pump belt at MM28 and needed to get to MM19. On the other hand, burning $1,100.00 in fuel with minimal running around is not cool.

One thing I do like is I can keep the boat on plane at 21 MPH by using the tabs and trimming the drives all the way in.

Last edited by Precision; 12-09-2013 at 07:54 PM.
Precision is offline  
Reply
Old 12-09-2013 | 07:31 PM
  #30  
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 390
Likes: 1
From: Tortola, BVI
Default

Originally Posted by dkwestern
I could plane my 33 PP with 2 engines, even dragging the 3rd prop. I ran 20 miles or so dragging the 3rd prop from Grand Haven to Holland in Lake Michigan.
I had less HP than nkosi as well.
Interesting. Maybe it was just my set up....
nkosi is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.