![]() |
triples vs twins?
Just looking for some insight on why people choose 3 smaller engines over two larger? Interested on peoples preference and why..
|
Most people do not choose 3 lower hp trips over twin higher hp engines.
If a boat came with the option of twins or trips and they both run 90mph, the twin will have a much better resale value. |
I would rather have 2 headaches instead of 3.
|
I thought the "age old" question on triples vs twins was addressed in the original "Total Recall".... Triples were interesting, but a nice set of twins wins! :eekdrop:
|
|
Triples were cool in big V's in the 90's. But now that boats are built lighter, better hulls, better engines, drives and props twins is the way to go. The third engine doesn't really even pull its own weight.
|
Originally Posted by ChadB
(Post 4095869)
Just looking for some insight on why people choose 3 smaller engines over two larger? Interested on peoples preference and why..
|
Originally Posted by Hustler40
(Post 4095983)
Triples were cool in big V's in the 90's. But now that boats are built lighter, better hulls, better engines, drives and props twins is the way to go. The third engine doesn't really even pull its own weight.
|
Originally Posted by Jupiter Sunsation
(Post 4096007)
Buying headers for a pair of 525's sucks, but buying 3 sets must reallllllly suck! But it would be cool to make up more nonsense for the stupid people asking questions like: Yep, I got 3 spare Nascar motors in there from last season, yep those are 525's so with three of them it is over 2000 HP! 525 is how many gallons it burns a day! :D :D :D
|
Originally Posted by Hustler40
(Post 4095983)
Triples were cool in big V's in the 90's. But now that boats are built lighter, better hulls, better engines, drives and props twins is the way to go. The third engine doesn't really even pull its own weight.
1/2 of boating is going fast, the other half is making a statement/showing off, http://www.powerandmotoryacht.com/si...gines-600w.jpg |
Last winter I spent 20k rebuilding my two 500efi's and one drive. Trips look good and have a cool factor but the cost out ways the cool factor to me.
|
Originally Posted by 92nsx
(Post 4096167)
More is always better..... Why not 6 engines? Because 6 wont fit on the transom.
1/2 of boating is going fast, the other half is making a statement/showing off, http://www.powerandmotoryacht.com/si...gines-600w.jpg |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by ratman
(Post 4096208)
wonder what kind of slip he is experiencing
[ATTACH=CONFIG]521014[/ATTACH] |
Personally blower motors scare me( 4 good reason, had a new 2003 382 Fastech w 575's w/ 3 years of constant probs) So, my 2007 NT 43 I ordered w trip 525's & had 275 flawless hours on them & the bravo drives!!! :coolcowboy:
|
Lets use my buddy's 97 42 Fountain for example...
To go 90+ 2x800SC with #6 or 3x525SC with Bravo Which is more reliable, last longer before rebuild, and cost less? |
Originally Posted by JRider
(Post 4095921)
I would rather have 2 headaches instead of 3.
Well said! |
Originally Posted by JRider
(Post 4095921)
I would rather have 2 headaches instead of 3.
Jon |
Originally Posted by Back4More
(Post 4096296)
Lets use my buddy's 97 42 Fountain for example...
To go 90+ 2x800SC with #6 or 3x525SC with Bravo Which is more reliable, last longer before rebuild, and cost less? |
I've always wondered about the issue Wrink and Tom commented on. Wouldn't owning a twin blower boat with high maintenance #6 drives be far more expensive than triple reliable 525s? I'm asking the question without bias (I don't own either type of boat), but have heard people on both sides of the issue and want to know the truth!
|
Lower power/engine=, less cost. The hull is more efficient with the 3 props cutting in, You will see less wear and less broken parts over all. (as long as you treat it right. That Is Why I went triple.
My options when boat was ordered for the same mph: 3- 496HO's or 2- 575's. The triple application was $75K less in cost. Was a turn key, go boating set up, and we NEVER had problems with drives. That is why triples are better in my opinion. (This is from someone who actually had a triple!!!) |
Originally Posted by chris21hope
(Post 4096348)
I've always wondered about the issue Wrink and Tom commented on. Wouldn't owning a twin blower boat with high maintenance #6 drives be far more expensive than triple reliable 525s? I'm asking the question without bias (I don't own either type of boat), but have heard people on both sides of the issue and want to know the truth!
I owned a 91 42 Fountain triple for 8 years..triple 540's 600HP. Never had a drive issue "standard bravos" 60 MPH put the hammer down and the boat pulled like a freight train. Sold it and bought a 97 42 Staggered. Thinking it would be the cats meow....wrong does not run nothing like my triple, gas cost more because I have to run the other engines harder. I still love the boat but miss my triple. Don't get me wrong its a hell of a lot easier to work on twins. But I can't plane out on one engine, like I could with the triple on two engines. That's my two pennies... |
Originally Posted by bajaholic
(Post 4096351)
Lower power/engine=, less cost. The hull is more efficient with the 3 props cutting in, You will see less wear and less broken parts over all. (as long as you treat it right. That Is Why I went triple.
My options when boat was ordered for the same mph: 3- 496HO's or 2- 575's. The triple application was $75K less in cost. Was a turn key, go boating set up, and we NEVER had problems with drives. That is why triples are better in my opinion. (This is from someone who actually had a triple!!!) |
I don't mean to highjack the thread, but would any one have any info on gph with triples. Boat is 43 Black Thunder, 3-500efi boat is loaded with heat air generator. I know at w/o it will suck fuel, would like to know about cruising speed gph.
|
3 x 500EFI
Originally Posted by ChadB
(Post 4095869)
Just looking for some insight on why people choose 3 smaller engines over two larger? Interested on peoples preference and why..
30 footer worked hard to get to 75mph, 40 with triples enjoy a beverage at 80! Complete different league. |
In our application, the Triples were very efficient under 3800 rpm. Once you break into the power band, they are like everything else that is running hard.... That being said, at the lower RPM,I am guessing you are running in the 68-72 mph range with that set up.
To give you an idea, a number of years ago, we trailered out to Desert Storm, spent the first 4 days on Lake Mohave in Laughlin, drove everywhere and put a 300 miles+ on the boat, used 1 tank. Pulled down to Havasu, filled up and ran the Poker Run. Burned through the entire tank of fuel in 1 day. (300 gal tank) |
Originally Posted by Back4More
(Post 4096296)
Lets use my buddy's 97 42 Fountain for example...
To go 90+ 2x800SC with #6 or 3x525SC with Bravo Which is more reliable, last longer before rebuild, and cost less? |
Originally Posted by Back4More View Post
Lets use my buddy's 97 42 Fountain for example... To go 90+ 2x800SC with #6 or 3x525SC with Bravo Which is more reliable, last longer before rebuild, and cost less?
Originally Posted by Back4More
(Post 4099170)
Sorry i just noticed i never answered my own question.... The Triple.
The triple in this configuration might be more reliable...but... 1) Now you need to add the cost of purchasing a complete set 3rd set of hardware from the engine to the prop. 2) The cost of daily maintenance for 3 instead of 2 3) The Fuel for 3 instead of 2 Add all that up and configure how long that extra cash will maintain the 2 800SC for this particular example. Few more fun facts to consider: 1) Center Drive is buried the deepest, Works harder thus all your center hardware is rebuilt quicker than the outboard two. 2) You want 2 right hand drives and 1 left hand drive. Again center drive takes the most abuse including prop damage. Right Hand parts are the most common to find when in need. 3) Had this triple / twin staggered conversation with John Pompi a few years back, arguably one of the worlds best riggers. John converted an Apache from triple 750's to Twin Staggered 800's and ran the same speed with one less power plant. Jon |
Originally Posted by Back4More
(Post 4099170)
Sorry i just noticed i never answered my own question.... The Triple.
|
600+ hrs and never broke any of the 3 Bravos...Lots of going fast and wave bashing.
Out ran a 41 with twin 750's and 3's in confused chop. |
1 Attachment(s)
"2) You want 2 right hand drives and 1 left hand drive."
I often wonder why mine was done like this? |
Originally Posted by romie
(Post 4101052)
"2) You want 2 right hand drives and 1 left hand drive."
I often wonder why mine was done like this? That's Interesting Jon |
Originally Posted by romie
(Post 4101052)
"2) You want 2 right hand drives and 1 left hand drive."
I often wonder why mine was done like this? |
Originally Posted by BBB725
(Post 4105060)
Without a better picture my guess is the drive shaft on the center motor had to clear the notched transom height/depth so the center motor was mounted higher and a longer/deeper lower unit was added to make up for the vee
|
Originally Posted by RT930turbo
(Post 4105062)
While you have picked up the discreet difference no one else noticed, you have failed to notice the OBVIOUS abnormality. Please play again. :evilb:
|
One thought to consider. 300 hp Verados have a better warranty and run on 89 octane so putting four of them on a center console's transom can actually be more cost effective and convenient for the owner than triple 350-hp Verados, which require higher octane fuel and have a shorter warranty.
|
I noticed.... All 3 are Right Hand Drives
Jon |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.