Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Boating Discussion (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion-51/)
-   -   triples vs twins? (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion/310139-triples-vs-twins.html)

ChadB 03-25-2014 10:50 PM

triples vs twins?
 
Just looking for some insight on why people choose 3 smaller engines over two larger? Interested on peoples preference and why..

Griff 03-26-2014 01:07 AM

Most people do not choose 3 lower hp trips over twin higher hp engines.
If a boat came with the option of twins or trips and they both run 90mph, the twin will have a much better resale value.

JRider 03-26-2014 06:24 AM

I would rather have 2 headaches instead of 3.

offshore312 03-26-2014 07:04 AM

I thought the "age old" question on triples vs twins was addressed in the original "Total Recall".... Triples were interesting, but a nice set of twins wins! :eekdrop:

92nsx 03-26-2014 07:40 AM

:whistle::poopoo:
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/c...psce2a7abf.jpg

Hustler40 03-26-2014 08:37 AM

Triples were cool in big V's in the 90's. But now that boats are built lighter, better hulls, better engines, drives and props twins is the way to go. The third engine doesn't really even pull its own weight.

Jupiter Sunsation 03-26-2014 09:03 AM


Originally Posted by ChadB (Post 4095869)
Just looking for some insight on why people choose 3 smaller engines over two larger? Interested on peoples preference and why..

I had a Mercury mechanic once laugh at a quad outboard Midnight Express and his comment was, why would you ever want that? Most of the time we can't keep 2 engines running and you want 2 more in the equation? That ME had an issue with the two outside engines blowing lower units when turning, boat goes into a turn and essentially airs out the lower unit on the opposite side of the boat.

Jupiter Sunsation 03-26-2014 09:06 AM


Originally Posted by Hustler40 (Post 4095983)
Triples were cool in big V's in the 90's. But now that boats are built lighter, better hulls, better engines, drives and props twins is the way to go. The third engine doesn't really even pull its own weight.

Buying headers for a pair of 525's sucks, but buying 3 sets must reallllllly suck! But it would be cool to make up more nonsense for the stupid people asking questions like: Yep, I got 3 spare Nascar motors in there from last season, yep those are 525's so with three of them it is over 2000 HP! 525 is how many gallons it burns a day! :D :D :D

RT930turbo 03-26-2014 09:52 AM


Originally Posted by Jupiter Sunsation (Post 4096007)
Buying headers for a pair of 525's sucks, but buying 3 sets must reallllllly suck! But it would be cool to make up more nonsense for the stupid people asking questions like: Yep, I got 3 spare Nascar motors in there from last season, yep those are 525's so with three of them it is over 2000 HP! 525 is how many gallons it burns a day! :D :D :D

I did meet a guy with a little run about, he didn't quite have a whole spare Nascar motor in it, but he did have Rusty Wallace's valve springs :lolhit:

92nsx 03-26-2014 01:29 PM


Originally Posted by Hustler40 (Post 4095983)
Triples were cool in big V's in the 90's. But now that boats are built lighter, better hulls, better engines, drives and props twins is the way to go. The third engine doesn't really even pull its own weight.

More is always better..... Why not 6 engines? Because 6 wont fit on the transom.

1/2 of boating is going fast, the other half is making a statement/showing off,

http://www.powerandmotoryacht.com/si...gines-600w.jpg

1989mach1 03-26-2014 01:52 PM

Last winter I spent 20k rebuilding my two 500efi's and one drive. Trips look good and have a cool factor but the cost out ways the cool factor to me.

ratman 03-26-2014 02:55 PM


Originally Posted by 92nsx (Post 4096167)
More is always better..... Why not 6 engines? Because 6 wont fit on the transom.

1/2 of boating is going fast, the other half is making a statement/showing off,

http://www.powerandmotoryacht.com/si...gines-600w.jpg

wonder what kind of slip he is experiencing

Tom A. 03-26-2014 03:31 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by ratman (Post 4096208)
wonder what kind of slip he is experiencing

It is a Cigarette.....

[ATTACH=CONFIG]521014[/ATTACH]

wrinkleface 03-26-2014 04:52 PM

Personally blower motors scare me( 4 good reason, had a new 2003 382 Fastech w 575's w/ 3 years of constant probs) So, my 2007 NT 43 I ordered w trip 525's & had 275 flawless hours on them & the bravo drives!!! :coolcowboy:

Back4More 03-26-2014 05:00 PM

Lets use my buddy's 97 42 Fountain for example...
To go 90+
2x800SC with #6
or
3x525SC with Bravo
Which is more reliable, last longer before rebuild, and cost less?

thebondtrader 03-26-2014 05:47 PM


Originally Posted by JRider (Post 4095921)
I would rather have 2 headaches instead of 3.

LOL.

Well said!

cougarman 03-26-2014 05:50 PM


Originally Posted by JRider (Post 4095921)
I would rather have 2 headaches instead of 3.

Your avatar suggest otherwise :party-smiley-048:

Jon

tomtbone1993 03-26-2014 05:59 PM


Originally Posted by Back4More (Post 4096296)
Lets use my buddy's 97 42 Fountain for example...
To go 90+
2x800SC with #6
or
3x525SC with Bravo
Which is more reliable, last longer before rebuild, and cost less?

exactly ...most people that are negative on the triple engine boats have never owned one.

chris21hope 03-26-2014 06:17 PM

I've always wondered about the issue Wrink and Tom commented on. Wouldn't owning a twin blower boat with high maintenance #6 drives be far more expensive than triple reliable 525s? I'm asking the question without bias (I don't own either type of boat), but have heard people on both sides of the issue and want to know the truth!

bajaholic 03-26-2014 06:20 PM

Lower power/engine=, less cost. The hull is more efficient with the 3 props cutting in, You will see less wear and less broken parts over all. (as long as you treat it right. That Is Why I went triple.

My options when boat was ordered for the same mph: 3- 496HO's or 2- 575's. The triple application was $75K less in cost. Was a turn key, go boating set up, and we NEVER had problems with drives.

That is why triples are better in my opinion. (This is from someone who actually had a triple!!!)

tomtbone1993 03-26-2014 06:30 PM


Originally Posted by chris21hope (Post 4096348)
I've always wondered about the issue Wrink and Tom commented on. Wouldn't owning a twin blower boat with high maintenance #6 drives be far more expensive than triple reliable 525s? I'm asking the question without bias (I don't own either type of boat), but have heard people on both sides of the issue and want to know the truth!


I owned a 91 42 Fountain triple for 8 years..triple 540's 600HP. Never had a drive issue "standard bravos" 60 MPH put the hammer down and the boat pulled like a freight train. Sold it and bought a 97 42 Staggered. Thinking it would be the cats meow....wrong does not run nothing like my triple, gas cost more because I have to run the other engines harder. I still love the boat but miss my triple. Don't get me wrong its a hell of a lot easier to work on twins. But I can't plane out on one engine, like I could with the triple on two engines.

That's my two pennies...

tomtbone1993 03-26-2014 06:33 PM


Originally Posted by bajaholic (Post 4096351)
Lower power/engine=, less cost. The hull is more efficient with the 3 props cutting in, You will see less wear and less broken parts over all. (as long as you treat it right. That Is Why I went triple.

My options when boat was ordered for the same mph: 3- 496HO's or 2- 575's. The triple application was $75K less in cost. Was a turn key, go boating set up, and we NEVER had problems with drives.

That is why triples are better in my opinion. (This is from someone who actually had a triple!!!)

My biggest issue was the drives being slightly off in height and turning...then tearing up my props :(

JohnAT 03-26-2014 07:18 PM

I don't mean to highjack the thread, but would any one have any info on gph with triples. Boat is 43 Black Thunder, 3-500efi boat is loaded with heat air generator. I know at w/o it will suck fuel, would like to know about cruising speed gph.

renbull 03-26-2014 07:29 PM

3 x 500EFI
 

Originally Posted by ChadB (Post 4095869)
Just looking for some insight on why people choose 3 smaller engines over two larger? Interested on peoples preference and why..

Current owner of 40 Outlaw with triple 500 EFI's on extension boxes. Previous was a 30 Baja with 900hp from twins.

30 footer worked hard to get to 75mph, 40 with triples enjoy a beverage at 80! Complete different league.

bajaholic 03-26-2014 08:56 PM

In our application, the Triples were very efficient under 3800 rpm. Once you break into the power band, they are like everything else that is running hard.... That being said, at the lower RPM,I am guessing you are running in the 68-72 mph range with that set up.

To give you an idea, a number of years ago, we trailered out to Desert Storm, spent the first 4 days on Lake Mohave in Laughlin, drove everywhere and put a 300 miles+ on the boat, used 1 tank. Pulled down to Havasu, filled up and ran the Poker Run. Burned through the entire tank of fuel in 1 day. (300 gal tank)

Back4More 03-31-2014 11:09 PM


Originally Posted by Back4More (Post 4096296)
Lets use my buddy's 97 42 Fountain for example...
To go 90+
2x800SC with #6
or
3x525SC with Bravo
Which is more reliable, last longer before rebuild, and cost less?

Sorry i just noticed i never answered my own question.... The Triple.

cougarman 04-02-2014 11:19 AM

Originally Posted by Back4More View Post

Lets use my buddy's 97 42 Fountain for example...
To go 90+
2x800SC with #6
or
3x525SC with Bravo
Which is more reliable, last longer before rebuild, and cost less?


Originally Posted by Back4More (Post 4099170)
Sorry i just noticed i never answered my own question.... The Triple.


The triple in this configuration might be more reliable...but...

1) Now you need to add the cost of purchasing a complete set 3rd set of hardware
from the engine to the prop.

2) The cost of daily maintenance for 3 instead of 2

3) The Fuel for 3 instead of 2

Add all that up and configure how long that extra cash will maintain the 2 800SC
for this particular example.


Few more fun facts to consider:

1) Center Drive is buried the deepest, Works harder thus all your center
hardware is rebuilt quicker than the outboard two.

2) You want 2 right hand drives and 1 left hand drive.
Again center drive takes the most abuse including prop damage.
Right Hand parts are the most common to find when in need.

3) Had this triple / twin staggered conversation with John Pompi a few years
back, arguably one of the worlds best riggers. John converted an Apache from
triple 750's to Twin Staggered 800's and ran the same speed with one less power plant.


Jon

cfischer 04-02-2014 01:57 PM


Originally Posted by Back4More (Post 4099170)
Sorry i just noticed i never answered my own question.... The Triple.

Depends on where and how u boat. If u like to bash waves and go fast, 800s and 6s all the way. If you're gonna do that with a triple eng bravo boat, better buy 3 spare drives

Back4More 04-03-2014 07:53 PM

600+ hrs and never broke any of the 3 Bravos...Lots of going fast and wave bashing.

Out ran a 41 with twin 750's and 3's in confused chop.

romie 04-03-2014 09:16 PM

1 Attachment(s)
"2) You want 2 right hand drives and 1 left hand drive."

I often wonder why mine was done like this?

cougarman 04-11-2014 02:23 PM


Originally Posted by romie (Post 4101052)
"2) You want 2 right hand drives and 1 left hand drive."

I often wonder why mine was done like this?


That's Interesting


Jon

BBB725 04-11-2014 03:30 PM


Originally Posted by romie (Post 4101052)
"2) You want 2 right hand drives and 1 left hand drive."

I often wonder why mine was done like this?

Without a better picture my guess is the drive shaft on the center motor had to clear the notched transom height/depth so the center motor was mounted higher and a longer/deeper lower unit was added to make up for the vee

RT930turbo 04-11-2014 03:45 PM


Originally Posted by BBB725 (Post 4105060)
Without a better picture my guess is the drive shaft on the center motor had to clear the notched transom height/depth so the center motor was mounted higher and a longer/deeper lower unit was added to make up for the vee

While you have picked up the discreet difference no one else noticed, you have failed to notice the OBVIOUS abnormality. Please play again. :evilb:

akaboatman 04-11-2014 03:59 PM


Originally Posted by RT930turbo (Post 4105062)
While you have picked up the discreet difference no one else noticed, you have failed to notice the OBVIOUS abnormality. Please play again. :evilb:

Now that's funny.

E Colby 04-11-2014 04:20 PM

One thought to consider. 300 hp Verados have a better warranty and run on 89 octane so putting four of them on a center console's transom can actually be more cost effective and convenient for the owner than triple 350-hp Verados, which require higher octane fuel and have a shorter warranty.

cougarman 04-11-2014 04:33 PM

I noticed.... All 3 are Right Hand Drives

Jon


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.