![]() |
Not to be a tire kicker but...
Does Statement Marine have any v bottom deck boats with twin 2.5 Mercs or something cool ? Just like to see or hear one. Maybe buy one someday
|
Originally Posted by mcprodesign
(Post 4184421)
Does Statement Marine have any v bottom deck boats with twin 2.5 Mercs or something cool ? Just like to see or hear one. Maybe buy one someday
Just the CC line, Cats, and the Vee's like invitation only and Saddle up. |
Originally Posted by Nate5.0
(Post 4184462)
They do not and I don't think I see one in the near future
Just the CC line, Cats, and the Vee's like invitation only and Saddle up. |
Originally Posted by mcprodesign
(Post 4184538)
I think something like this would be cool. Except open bow and the seat right in front of the windshiled facing forward and maybe a backwards facing seat in the bow. ( where the girl could be sitting) ;)
The majority of their CC's are open bow design. |
|
Originally Posted by Nate5.0
(Post 4184679)
|
the only thing is I think you would have to put load sensors in the front. Boat stays under 40 with a load ahead of the windsheild. that way the idiots can't go 90 miles per hour with people ahead of the windshield. But it's seating behind the windshield is good I would think high-performance would be very safe in the boat just not in the front of the boat (at cruising only)
|
Ask Nor-Tech to combine these two, and you have your huckleberry:
http://nor-techboats.com/models/320-mc/ http://nor-techboats.com/wp-content/...ch_32_MC_9.jpg http://nor-techboats.com/models/36-mc-flyer/ http://nor-techboats.com/wp-content/...C_Flyer_91.jpg |
Originally Posted by mcprodesign
(Post 4184806)
the only thing is I think you would have to put load sensors in the front. Boat stays under 40 with a load ahead of the windsheild. that way the idiots can't go 90 miles per hour with people ahead of the windshield. But it's seating behind the windshield is good I would think high-performance would be very safe in the boat just not in the front of the boat (at cruising only)
|
Originally Posted by Sydwayz
(Post 4184807)
Ask Nor-Tech to combine these two, and you have your huckleberry:
http://nor-techboats.com/models/320-mc/ http://nor-techboats.com/wp-content/...ch_32_MC_9.jpg http://nor-techboats.com/models/36-mc-flyer/ http://nor-techboats.com/wp-content/...C_Flyer_91.jpg |
We had 13 people in a 38 Statement running 65+ in St. Pete a couple years back.
Awesome boat. |
Originally Posted by mcprodesign
(Post 4184806)
the only thing is I think you would have to put load sensors in the front. Boat stays under 40 with a load ahead of the windsheild. that way the idiots can't go 90 miles per hour with people ahead of the windshield. But it's seating behind the windshield is good I would think high-performance would be very safe in the boat just not in the front of the boat (at cruising only)
|
out of curiosity what is the big difference, is it simply weight?
to a non expert like me I see the same hull with light outboards
Originally Posted by jmeng
(Post 4184954)
Going to be pretty damn tough or impossible to get one of these to 90+ mph. Maybe quad 350 Verado's but I doubt it....
|
Originally Posted by jmeng
(Post 4184954)
Going to be pretty damn tough or impossible to get one of these to 90+ mph. Maybe quad 350 Verado's but I doubt it....
I think that stands for any of the CC lux market boats. NT has got there I think with the 7 marine model and I am betting the OL will see that #. I also think Statement could do it if they wanted too but not sure they care to stear to that direction, could be wrong though. |
thanks for all of your input.50% of what I like about the boat that i have is the sound of it idling at the dock. A 2.5 Merc sounds pretty damn cool idling. But two of those things are not going to push a statement past 50 miles an hour. Once again thank you so much for your input
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.