![]() |
My buddy Lake Effect is telling me to redo my **** lol then we know EXACTLY what I got... man I was looking at them 632's!!!!
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4186317)
My buddy Lake Effect is telling me to redo my **** lol then we know EXACTLY what I got... man I was looking at them 632's!!!!
|
..
|
Call Bill at Ateco. I've had nothing but good luck with that company.
|
Originally Posted by FIXX
(Post 4186368)
theirs no replacement for displacement.. 632 i one of my favorite motors.. heres another place to look.. mri makes a good block,,http://www.competitionproducts.com/M...products/1875/
|
The BW-72C can be beefed up (You might as well pull them). The TRS you are basically limited to about 700 hp.
Wannabe |
Originally Posted by wannabe
(Post 4186476)
The BW-72C can be beefed up (You might as well pull them). The TRS you are basically limited to about 700 hp.
Wannabe and yes the TRS will suffer if I went too much hp, always seems like a good idea for more but reality what I got is "safe" |
Originally Posted by pstorti
(Post 4184986)
Doesn't Chevrolet offer 572 crate engines? Maybe they sell a short block version
The few 632s I've seen in person seem to be hit/miss combinations. My personal belief is the rod angle isn't prone to long life..... |
I had almost 900 hp and 875 lbs of torque to my top gun and the 72cs I had built with 10 plates never missed a beat hooked up to 3a drives. Always cherry red type F trans fluid
|
Originally Posted by cigrocket
(Post 4186943)
I had almost 900 hp and 875 lbs of torque to my top gun and the 72cs I had built with 10 plates never missed a beat hooked up to 3a drives. Always cherry red type F trans fluid
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.