Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Mercury Racing Showcasing Four-Valve Heads on LS Crate Engine at SEMA Show >

Mercury Racing Showcasing Four-Valve Heads on LS Crate Engine at SEMA Show

Notices

Mercury Racing Showcasing Four-Valve Heads on LS Crate Engine at SEMA Show

Old 11-14-2014, 12:33 PM
  #31  
Registered
 
JIMKID Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Livonia Mi Usa
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

this is awesome I thought of LS based 7 years ago and going strong cant beat them don't need those heads its all for the bling factor
JIMKID Motorsports is offline  
Old 11-14-2014, 02:30 PM
  #32  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Brookfield Wi
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HTRDLNCN
probably cause a stock ls2 makes almost same power and more torque at the same rpm for $1500 less with those old school heavy lifters and pushrods..
to a manufacturer marinizing engines $1500 a unit is huge..
There is also the fact the coyote is approx 3" wider than big block chevy and approx 6"+ wider than a small block.. Thats a lot of real estate in a twin engine boat..
__________________________________________________ __________
GM LS2 Crate Engine
Part No: GM-LS2CR
Price: $5,899.00
The LS2 produces 400HP @ 6500 RPM and 400lbs/ft of torque @ 4400 RPM
__________________________________________________ _____________

5.0L 4V COYOTE 420 HP MUSTANG CRATE ENGINE
M-6007-M50*
Suggested Retail Price
$7,399.00
420 horsepower @ 6500 rpm and 390 ft.-lb.+ of torque @ 4250 rpm
I referenced wrong site

http://www.fordracingbyspeedshopdire...m-6007-m50.htm

Price:$6,319.00

The LS 2 needs 361 cu to obtain 400hp
Ford 5.0 is 302 cu to obtain 420hp but more importantly a flat 390 ft lbs. torque curve. STOCK

Yes the ford is wider but the exhaust ports face down.

I'm not saying the LS 2 won't work but the Ford (due to the head design) should outperform in every way.

If must have 400cu see link below

http://www.indmar.com/Engine/RaptorS...TORSERIES.aspx
abmotorman is offline  
Old 11-14-2014, 05:05 PM
  #33  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake Travis ,Texas
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Not saying its not a good engine but Im sure it will be as popular
as every other Ford engine in the past has been in the offshore world..

(ps: I have a couple each in my stable so Im not partisan to anyone!)

Originally Posted by abmotorman
I referenced wrong site

http://www.fordracingbyspeedshopdire...m-6007-m50.htm

Price:$6,319.00

The LS 2 needs 361 cu to obtain 400hp
Ford 5.0 is 302 cu to obtain 420hp but more importantly a flat 390 ft lbs. torque curve. STOCK

Yes the ford is wider but the exhaust ports face down.

I'm not saying the LS 2 won't work but the Ford (due to the head design) should outperform in every way.

If must have 400cu see link below

http://www.indmar.com/Engine/RaptorS...TORSERIES.aspx

Last edited by HTRDLNCN; 11-14-2014 at 05:08 PM.
HTRDLNCN is offline  
Old 11-14-2014, 05:21 PM
  #34  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,391
Received 2,962 Likes on 1,334 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by abmotorman
Yes the ford is wider but the exhaust ports face down.

[/url]
In an I/O our exhaust's go up and then out. So with this 'facing down exhaust port' to get a proper transition (bend) without restriction it would make the exhausts wider. If they did not get wider, then the exhaust port would get hampered. No ?
SB is offline  
Old 11-14-2014, 06:11 PM
  #35  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: FredVegas, Va
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
In an I/O our exhaust's go up and then out. So with this 'facing down exhaust port' to get a proper transition (bend) without restriction it would make the exhausts wider. If they did not get wider, then the exhaust port would get hampered. No ?
Yep, sounds right to me. The only boat it would work in would be a single engine boat, or staggered twins.

Lets also not forget than the Coyote block/sleeves are no good (factory) beyond around 600HP. So if your boat has one in it, and then you feel the need to put a blower on it...

You may as well start out with a 496, LOL

Im actually wondering in the back of my head if Merc is doing this and planning on trying to SELL this tooling and molds and stuff TO GM down the road after they get it more figured out.
TooLateVTEC is offline  
Old 11-14-2014, 10:18 PM
  #36  
Registered
 
Bad Ass TA WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 418
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by abmotorman
The LS 2 needs 361 cu to obtain 400hp
Ford 5.0 is 302 cu to obtain 420hp but more importantly a flat 390 ft lbs. torque curve. STOCK

Yes the ford is wider but the exhaust ports face down.

I'm not saying the LS 2 won't work but the Ford (due to the head design) should outperform in every way.

If must have 400cu see link below

http://www.indmar.com/Engine/RaptorS...TORSERIES.aspx
The LS2 was also debuted in 2005... Not sure where to start the argument with the above. The LS package is just so simple and effective its hard to beat. I think this design from Mercury will just be a super stable valvetrain, with big 7K+ RPM, and at least 425horse. That would be bullet proof with a good bottom end. Which I think is the next question... Which block???
Bad Ass TA WS6 is offline  
Old 11-14-2014, 10:25 PM
  #37  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Brookfield Wi
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TooLateVTEC
Yep, sounds right to me. The only boat it would work in would be a single engine boat, or staggered twins.

Lets also not forget than the Coyote block/sleeves are no good (factory) beyond around 600HP. So if your boat has one in it, and then you feel the need to put a blower on it...

You may as well start out with a 496, LOL

Im actually wondering in the back of my head if Merc is doing this and planning on trying to SELL this tooling and molds and stuff TO GM down the road after they get it more figured out.
Oh boy, someone better tell Edelbrock not to warranty this motor. It makes too much HP?

http://www.jegs.com/p/Edelbrock/Edel...46326/10002/-1

No doubt the exhaust port exiting downward creates some challenges but a thru prop or utilizing the gap between to rear of the engine and the transom would be an option to discharge above the water line.

My main point to this whole discussion is Mercury Racing is recognizing GM's weaknesses and is proactive by reducing valvetrain weight. How many foreign engines still use pushrods? I can't name one! I'm a Blue oval / Bowtie guy but how long to we have to wait for the engineers from GM to design some decent valvetrains?
abmotorman is offline  
Old 11-15-2014, 07:18 AM
  #38  
Registered
 
SS930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: At the office.
Posts: 6,679
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Here's the scope...

Up to this point this project has been called a "design exercise" to show off Merc's engineering capabilities. my take is they would not forge new heads for the hell of it, So I would expect to see more of this platform from Merc.

From what I was told by someone very close to this project (I'll leave his name and position out for his sake), they have not run this setup yet, they just completed it before SEMA. Obviously offering less maintenance and increased reliability, with a system like this you'd need to really spin it to see the major power improvements over the GM design. They are thinking 8000 rpm and 800hp NA is very possible with this setup. What surprised me was he said they are looking at selling this setup as a kit. He said they are thinking $4k for the heads bare with the conversion pieces. $10k for complete heads and system. $20k for complete engine with those heads and DOHC covnersion. Sounds reasonable to me, but obviously they aren't for sale yet at those prices so we will see what hits the market and and at what price point.

The way they added the drive system was pretty slick, they basically just spaced out the factory accessories with nice aluminum bracketry and installed their drive system behind them.

Here's some more info and pics:






Now what I would really like to see is for Merc (or someone else) to develop a similar kit for the BBC!!!!!
SS930 is offline  
Old 11-15-2014, 08:34 AM
  #39  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: taxachusetts
Posts: 2,999
Received 550 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

well thats not gonna fit in a vette to easily.
sutphen 30 is offline  
Old 11-15-2014, 08:41 AM
  #40  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: taxachusetts
Posts: 2,999
Received 550 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

and if everyone has a hard on for 4 valves per,,why not just go this route. http://www.araoengineering.com/

you guys want to cry,,wait till you lose a bearing or 2 and your upper end oil passages to those cams get plugged.things like to gall up real fast and stop stuff in the upper end.
half my work is fixing foreign heads.
sutphen 30 is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.