![]() |
Doesn't it just boil down to hull efficiency, weight, and water conditions? The horsepower needed to move these factors at your desired speed determines the mileage. For basic discussion a 350hp outboard, 496, 454, 502, whatever will burn the same amount of fuel when producing 300hp. So isn't it just a mathematic calculation?
|
Small cat 28'-32' with mild efi power would probably be best.
|
Originally Posted by Powerquest230
(Post 4340090)
Doesn't it just boil down to hull efficiency, weight, and water conditions? The horsepower needed to move these factors at your desired speed determines the mileage. For basic discussion a 350hp outboard, 496, 454, 502, whatever will burn the same amount of fuel when producing 300hp. So isn't it just a mathematic calculation?
|
Originally Posted by hogie roll
(Post 4339374)
Merc 1100s. They are turned down 1350s that come with 6s. Cig is only building new boats with merc power.
|
Originally Posted by hogie roll
(Post 4340119)
Not exactly. You're implying that all of those engines would have the same bsfc while producing 300hp, which is not the case. Pumping losses can be a problem at part throttle. The most effecient scenario would be to have an engine at wot but lugged down to its peak torque rpm and therefore at max bsfc. This isn't exactly possible due to prop sizing etc. The later generation suzukis have wideband O2 sensors implemented into the engine controls so they can lean out at cruise speed, this would be the optimal scenario for a gas engine. Other than that hull efficiency, weight and waves are the major contributors.
|
Originally Posted by iliveonanisland
(Post 4341626)
Is Suzuki the only manufacturer doing this? Thx rm
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.