![]() |
I/O conversion to OB's
If outboards are the ticket to trouble free boating and I/O boats are worthless then why haven't we seen more conversions being done? I know the 38 Powerplay has a triple OB boat and a 42 Tiger went to triple OB's.
http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...17-o66545.html 4- 300 Vrods with warranty asking 40K Find a 42-45 Sonic with no power and hang a bracket, mount the motors and have the best of both worlds! Really anything without a molded swim platform should work (Apache, Cig, AT, etc....sorry no Fountains). If the boat is beamy enough then hang 4, if not hang 3 and have a spare motor. |
If they are so reliable why does 3 of the 4 have new powerheads?:lolhit:
But really to me wouldn't the issue be the change in the CG? You would be taking a boat designed with motors mounted low and forward then sticking them high and back. Granted less weight but seems it would be more then just clamping them on. Maybe someone like Pat (AT) can jump in as he has done that on a boat designed for I/O's. I am thinking the 33, it would be interesting to hear if/what changes they made when they put the 2 egg beaters on the back. |
42-25 Sonics have molded in swim platforms.
|
Who has said I/O's are worthless?
|
I'm certainly not an expert, but IMO if you can't get the results you want with 3 OB's, stick with I/O's. These boats with 4 and 5 OB's start to look ridiculous.
|
If you are going verado you will also have to change out wiring harness, steering, and use a DTS as they are fly by wire. These are not cheap modifications!
|
Ask any reputable builder or refurb shop and they will tell you its all about the CG. There is significant risk of altering the handling characteristics of an IO boat by merely plugging the transom, adding some bracing or knees and hanging a bracket. The placement of the fuel tank in an IO or OB requires important calculations for the hull to run at the optimum angle for the best efficiency.
|
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 4464092)
If they are so reliable why does 3 of the 4 have new powerheads?:lolhit:
But really to me wouldn't the issue be the change in the CG? You would be taking a boat designed with motors mounted low and forward then sticking them high and back. Granted less weight but seems it would be more then just clamping them on. Maybe someone like Pat (AT) can jump in as he has done that on a boat designed for I/O's. I am thinking the 33, it would be interesting to hear if/what changes they made when they put the 2 egg beaters on the back. |
Originally Posted by 272bajadriver
(Post 4464169)
Exactly what I was thinking. Barely 3 year old motors and 3 of the 4 power heads have already been replaced, interesting.
Just my guess but I think by the time someone has converted a 40' go fast boat to quad outboards, I reckon it would owe you a fortune. Hull and transom mods, wiring as mentioned above, engine hatch/storage, rear lounge etc, etc. the list would be huge and with the balance issue, it could easily end up an underperforming orphan. I guess all good things were done a first time but this one would have me very concerned...... Masses of homework needed. RR |
Originally Posted by 272bajadriver
(Post 4464169)
Exactly what I was thinking. Barely 3 year old motors and 3 of the 4 power heads have already been replaced, interesting.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.