![]() |
Seven Marine, more to the story
I have always marveled at the engineering behind Seven Marine outboards. Their design was amazing and they really pushed the boundaries of what everyone thought was possible. It was bad news to hear that Volvo Penta, who acquired a majority stake in 2017, would cease production in Jan 2021.
There is always more to it than a PR statement can justify. But, here is a deep dive and a bit of a tip of the cap to Eric, Rick and Brian Davis who built the company in Wisconsin from a concept to reality. It's a great story with a somewhat sad ending. https://www.wavetowave.com/home/2020...gy-up-in-smoke . https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...1533412046.jpg |
Great article, but reading about all of those "specialized parts supply chain" would make me real nervous if I owned those OB's even when they were in production.
The Yamaha 425 is the killer, made for big heavy boats and a worldwide parts and service network. |
Originally Posted by Jupiter Sunsation
(Post 4768381)
Great article, but reading about all of those "specialized parts supply chain" would make me real nervous if I owned those OB's even when they were in production.
The Yamaha 425 is the killer, made for big heavy boats and a worldwide parts and service network. |
Originally Posted by WavetoWave
(Post 4768414)
Agree with you there. And yes the Yamaha 425 is a beast, the 425 HP belies what a torque monster it is.
|
Originally Posted by Stuckonstupid
(Post 4768418)
But it’s SOOO effin heavy.
|
Originally Posted by Nate5.0
(Post 4768420)
That sits on boats that are also so effin heavy. Not like anyone is out racing with 425 yammers
|
After living in the Silicon Valley for thirty years with a high rate of acquisition and management changes that article seems about right. Sounds like some amazing accomplishments with that outboard.
|
Originally Posted by Stuckonstupid
(Post 4768422)
True, but for a 300 lb weight savings, mercury 400’s make more sense. Just one a holes opinion.
|
Originally Posted by caseyh
(Post 4768431)
i am merc for going fast and Yamaha fishing. To me they don’t cross markets. Would never build a play boat with yamahas and never would build a fishing boat or big cruiser with merc. To different motors
|
Originally Posted by caseyh
(Post 4768431)
i am merc for going fast and Yamaha fishing. To me they don’t cross markets. Would never build a play boat with yamahas and never would build a fishing boat or big cruiser with merc. To different motors
|
Originally Posted by Stuckonstupid
(Post 4768422)
True, but for a 300 lb weight savings, mercury 400’s make more sense. Just one a holes opinion.
On a fishing boat.. the 425 makes some where around 25% more torque and has a 5 year warranty over Mercs 3 year. The only reason I would see anyone not taking the Yamaha on a fishing rig would be the cost difference really IMO. |
Originally Posted by Nate5.0
(Post 4768481)
On a fishing boat.. the 425 makes some where around 25% more torque and has a 5 year warranty over Mercs 3 year.
The only reason I would see anyone not taking the Yamaha on a fishing rig would be the cost difference really IMO. |
Originally Posted by Stuckonstupid
(Post 4768483)
Depends on the boat. My insurance company would not write a new policy if I installed Yamaha 425’s due the the additional weight and being within a certain percentage of transom capacity.
I can understand that part of it. I am speaking more in line with I am building a new HCB, Yellowfin, Contender, etc etc and getting power options. In that application aside from cost I just cant see the reason to run a merc there is all and the transom issue isnt one in a scenario like that. As someone prior in the thread said, they seem like they (Merc and Yamaha) are perfectly two different motors focused on two different applications and each one does that very well. |
Great story. Thanks for posting it. I wonder how many engines 7 sold during it's lifespan? Volvo sucks for buying the company just to kill it off!
|
Originally Posted by thirdchildhood
(Post 4768538)
Great story. Thanks for posting it. I wonder how many engines 7 sold during it's lifespan? Volvo sucks for buying the company just to kill it off!
Also aside from the green BS. I'm sure the numbers don't add up too well as far as sales, good margins and whatnot. |
Great piece, as usual, Jared. I would gently disagree that Seven Marine "changed the industry" but that's one of those inherently subjective statements that's hard to prove or disprove.
|
"Changed Industry"
Originally Posted by Matt Trulio
(Post 4769305)
Great piece, as usual, Jared. I would gently disagree that Seven Marine "changed the industry" but that's one of those inherently subjective statements that's hard to prove or disprove.
Chris |
Originally Posted by Blueabyss
(Post 4769306)
You might want to take that conversation up with Elias De La Torre .
Chris To be fair, that was not their intent—at least that's what I was told in numerous interviews during the years with those inside the company. Obviously, Seven Marine outboards were an automatic rule-out for anything in the mainstream runabout world from the likes of Sea-Ray, as well as tow boats and, equally obvious, large yachts. So what you ended up with in terms of overall impact was in a pretty small niche of super-heavy center consoles. As I said, Jared's piece was excellent. But I just don't see how Seven Marine products changed the entire marine industry. That's a stretch. |
The big rumor I'm hearing is that Mercury is unveiling a replacement for the 7 Marine engines at the beginning of the new year. It will be radically different from anything Mercury has ever built before........
|
mercury "was" going to unviel their new 500 at the canceled miami 2021 show. probably will be at the poker run now instead
|
The thing I can not figure out is why did Volvo buy them. I could understand why Merc would have bought them just to shut them down and eliminate some future competition. But it looks like Volvo did it for them...lol.. Volvo gets nothing from it but a swift kick in the pants and Merc and Yamaha will reap the rewards. I would think the Executives at Merc are still scratching their heads over this one.
Chris |
Couldnt it be said that Seven Marine was the catalyst for the majors to start upping their horsepower goals?
|
Originally Posted by Blueabyss
(Post 4769352)
The thing I can not figure out is why did Volvo buy them. I could understand why Merc would have bought them just to shut them down and eliminate some future competition. But it looks like Volvo did it for them...lol.. Volvo gets nothing from it but a swift kick in the pants and Merc and Yamaha will reap the rewards. I would think the Executives at Merc are still scratching their heads over this one.
Chris |
Originally Posted by Blueabyss
(Post 4769352)
The thing I can not figure out is why did Volvo buy them. I could understand why Merc would have bought them just to shut them down and eliminate some future competition. But it looks like Volvo did it for them...lol.. Volvo gets nothing from it but a swift kick in the pants and Merc and Yamaha will reap the rewards. I would think the Executives at Merc are still scratching their heads over this one.
Chris Next CEO threw that trophy in trash. If it was a numbers game, the new CEO looks like a rockstar for stopping the bleeding on a product that had limited potential sales. HCB and Intrepid are probably doing the head scratching on what they are going to power their bigger boats with. You can't hang 2-3 more Yamaha 425s off the back of their 65 ft center console! |
Time for the first stagger OB's,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, This is a joke of course.
Originally Posted by Jupiter Sunsation
(Post 4769373)
One CEO cherished Seven marine
Next CEO threw that trophy in trash. If it was a numbers game, the new CEO looks like a rockstar for stopping the bleeding on a product that had limited potential sales. HCB and Intrepid are probably doing the head scratching on what they are going to power their bigger boats with. You can't hang 2-3 more Yamaha 425s off the back of their 65 ft center console! |
Originally Posted by Jupiter Sunsation
(Post 4769373)
HCB and Intrepid are probably doing the head scratching on what they are going to power their bigger boats with. You can't hang 2-3 more Yamaha 425s off the back of their 65 ft center console! |
Originally Posted by offshoredrillin
(Post 4769382)
I would do diesels like the 45 nortech option...
would have loved to see a speedy lower on the 627. Im sure some big cat guys and fast CCs would have had to have it. I also like the simplicity of big CCs that were pushed by twins. |
7's wont work on a cat and or it would be counter productive as they dont like to be surfaced or aired out. They break off blades and break drives. Looking at the heft of their drive I would not think it is possible to break but who knows what metal is used in the gears. I would have to agree with the bleeding point comment and its going to be tough for Intrepid and HCB and the likes to re-configure power. Diesels are cool but that would weigh more than 7's I did see a 56 Nor Tech with I think Quad Cummins and surface drives. Cant imagine doing an oil change on that. Guess you could buy a 55 gal drum for your oil changes.. Maybe in the future Merc or another will come along with some bigger power and less weight.
Chris |
Originally Posted by Blueabyss
(Post 4769397)
7's wont work on a cat and or it would be counter productive as they dont like to be surfaced or aired out. They break off blades and break drives. Looking at the heft of their drive I would not think it is possible to break but who knows what metal is used in the gears. I would have to agree with the bleeding point comment and its going to be tough for Intrepid and HCB and the likes to re-configure power. Diesels are cool but that would weigh more than 7's I did see a 56 Nor Tech with I think Quad Cummins and surface drives. Cant imagine doing an oil change on that. Guess you could buy a 55 gal drum for your oil changes.. Maybe in the future Merc or another will come along with some bigger power and less weight.
Chris |
Originally Posted by offshoredrillin
(Post 4769412)
Even with the costs of upkeep a diesel would be light years less expensive in the long run, thousands of hours before a rebuild compared to hundreds. the only downside would be speed, but in a big CC, im looking for comfort not top end.
The other issue would be arneson parts, "Rik" hasn't been great with getting parts lately. |
Originally Posted by Matt Trulio
(Post 4769305)
Great piece, as usual, Jared. I would gently disagree that Seven Marine "changed the industry" but that's one of those inherently subjective statements that's hard to prove or disprove.
|
One of my spy’s in Fla said Merc was set to release a 525 HP version of their OB at the Miami show until covid cancelled the show.
Personally I think those motors are ugly but regardless, we are in midst of a paradigm shift in OBs. |
Originally Posted by Jupiter Sunsation
(Post 4769419)
High RPMS are death on diesels so in a performance boat that might be an issue, even BobtheBuilder had a motor fail on his 50 NT. It had less than 1000 hours on it IIRC.
The other issue would be arneson parts, "Rik" hasn't been great with getting parts lately. |
Originally Posted by offshoredrillin
(Post 4769429)
phuck that guy, there are other drive options out there that are similar to them, from reliable companies.. not theives
|
Originally Posted by offshoredrillin
(Post 4769429)
phuck that guy, there are other drive options out there that are similar to them, from reliable companies.. not theives
|
Twin Disc Marine manufactures/sells the larger (ASD-8 on up) Arneson Drives, Rik would not be involved with the sales/support for the drives that would be mounted behind diesels on the larger (40' and up) CCs and/or cats.
|
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 4769443)
!!!!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by Jupiter Sunsation
(Post 4769431)
Whew for a second I was thinking you were talking about BobtheBuilder! :D
|
Originally Posted by offshoredrillin
(Post 4769471)
noooo Bob is awesome, the other one and his wife have ripped off lots of people...
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.