![]() |
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 4850528)
Because a mystic doesn’t need 4 engines!!! My 50 Mystic with 1850hp turbines ran 210 when it had plenty of room to get there. Qatar ran 244 in kilo with twin T55’s, how fast do you want to go!??!?! Lol
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...9244a8edd7.jpg |
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 4850528)
Because a mystic doesn’t need 4 engines!!! My 50 Mystic with 1850hp turbines ran 210 when it had plenty of room to get there. Qatar ran 244 in kilo with twin T55’s, how fast do you want to go!??!?! Lol
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...514f6ffe9.jpeg |
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 4850446)
Spruce Goose…
|
Originally Posted by 1MOSES1
(Post 4850523)
Both props are competing for clean water…maybe a single prop is more efficient. So far dual prop boats have faired better than quad propeller.
Not side-by-side, they're not. It they were actually staggered, maybe, where their blade radii actually intersected. But not as long as they have their own lane. Thanks. Brad. (937)545-8991 |
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 4850528)
Because a mystic doesn’t need 4 engines!!! My 50 Mystic with 1850hp turbines ran 210 when it had plenty of room to get there. Qatar ran 244 in kilo with twin T55’s, how fast do you want to go!??!?! Lol
Records are set to be broken, right? When asked "how much is enough", J Rockafeller replied, "Just a few dollars more. By your logic, a boat doesn't NEED turbines, at all. I mean.... How fast do you want to go? Thanks. Brad. (937)545-8991 |
Originally Posted by Brad Christy
(Post 4850538)
Moses,
Not side-by-side, they're not. It they were actually staggered, maybe, where their blade radii actually intersected. But not as long as they have their own lane. Thanks. Brad. (937)545-8991 Before you talk about the multi engine outboards that is because they are in a way limited on the HP. The Mercury 600 OB are not intended for a fast light hull. The only go fast cat that somewhat recently used more than 2 was the DONZI thing. |
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 4850540)
More drives = more drag. It's why a lot of go fast went to dual motors rather then triples.
Before you talk about the multi engine outboards that is because they are in a way limited on the HP. The Mercury 600 OB are not intended for a fast light hull. The only go fast cat that somewhat recently used more than 2 was the DONZI thing. Surface drives don't induce much drag, if any, really. Besides, even with standard drives, each prop overrides the drag induced by its own outdrive, right? There is a net gain for each. Yes, weight is a factor, but that's where turbines shine, right? Thanks. Brad. (937)545-8991 |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4850531)
Hold my Controller ! :) :wink lol :grinser010::lolhit:
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...9244a8edd7.jpg Nah. Most surface applications use a pistol grip transmitter. :angry-smiley-038: I did (do?) use Spektrum, though. Thanks. Brad. (937)545-8991 |
Originally Posted by Brad Christy
(Post 4850508)
Hogie,
I did a quick Google and read the history of the variants on the T55. There were a few that topped the 4K SHP mark (There's one in development that is expected to put out 6500 😮), but they are considerably bigger in either diameter, length or both, and I'd think the prospect of retrofitting them would prove challenging. The latest article I've been able to find indicates the standard 2900-3000 SHP was what was used. Thanks Brad. (937)545-8991 |
Originally Posted by Brad Christy
(Post 4850542)
Wildman,
Surface drives don't induce much drag, if any, really. Besides, even with standard drives, each prop overrides the drag induced by its own outdrive, right? There is a net gain for each. Yes, weight is a factor, but that's where turbines shine, right? Thanks. Brad. (937)545-8991 |
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 4850557)
It's still drag to overcome. That is why on fast V's the same total power a twin is faster than a trip.
This is from my aviation days but applicable. "There are three types of parasite drag: form drag, interference drag, and skin friction." |
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 4850557)
It's still drag to overcome. That is why on fast V's the same total power a twin is faster than a trip.
That's true, and makes sense; equal HP, but half again as much outdrive drag. But I don't think anybody goes from twin 750s to triple 500s, do they? Thanks. Brad. (937)545-8991 |
Not sure what you are saying there Brad, but if you want do a little research for real world one that is real easy would be 47 fountains.
They used to make them in triple 525’s and twin SCI700’s with NXT transmissions and Number 6 drives. |
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 4850626)
Not sure what you are saying there Brad, but if you want do a little research for real world one that is real easy would be 47 fountains.
They used to make them in triple 525’s and twin SCI700’s with NXT transmissions and Number 6 drives. I'm guessing the twin is faster. Same HP (essentially), with half again the engine weight and half again the outdrive drag, the triple will fall behind. That actually makes sense. But what happens when you put triple SCI700s in it? Serious question. I would also have to guess the triple consumed more fuel. I have to wonder what the incentive was to opt for the triple. Kewl factor? Back to my earlier point.... If I were going to build a quad turbine Mystic (a man can dream, right?) to attempt to challenge the LOTO record, it would have surface drives, which are virtually all thrust and no drag. Simple math says 12K SHP is going to crush a record set with 9K SHP (assuming they were the upgraded T55s, and not the standard 3K SHP units). Of course, this is also assuming the boat stayed on the water. Somewhere between that risk and the cost of doing so is the only reason Qatar still holds that record. As soon as somebody with enough flammable cash and big enough cajones decides it's going down, it's going down. We've seen that what it would take is mechanically feasible. Thanks. Brad. (937)545-8991 |
I'm thinking the easier path to breaking the LOTO record is to go small with an unlimited hydroplane.
|
If you guys are going to dream, dream big. Just build a 50' Mystic with a pair of Rolls Royce T-56 turbines with almost 6,000 shp, weigh just under 2,000#s and are 12' long and 27" in diameter. Have BPM custom build a set of drives capable of handling the power and Rolla build you a set of forged props. The turbines alone will set you back $5M, add another $5M for the one-off custom boat/rigging/testing and for a cool $10M you can probably go break Spirit of Qatar's record (if you live through it). I honestly don't think we'll ever see that record broken. I don't think you'll ever see somebody willing to outspend them, or that doesn't value their life enough to chase that record. Basically similar reasons we see other long standing boat speed records not broken (ultimate world speed record and outboard speed record). Interesting thread though!
|
Originally Posted by Interceptor
(Post 4850632)
I'm thinking the easier path to breaking the LOTO record is to go small with an unlimited hydroplane.
|
Originally Posted by Skater30
(Post 4850634)
Think even smaller! Eddie Knox (owner of Problem Child, multiple time record setting and national champion TFH before he quit racing), told me he was seriously considering taking his team back to LOTO and setting the record at one time. He would've put two fuel tanks/fuel systems in the boat, one for alcohol and one for nitromethane. They would run the boat from the start to to about 3/4 track on alcohol and then for the last 1/4 they'd switch over to nitro. They could gear up from their standard drag setup and he figured they could easily break SoQ's record. Seeing as Problem Child had run over 260mph in the 1/4, running at least that speed or greater seemed an easy task, basically having as long as they wanted to gain speed. The big question would've been could they have gotten wind and water conditions that would allow their 4,000#, 7,000HP 20' Bullet hydro to run those speeds.
All this discussion makes Ken Warby's 317-mph water-speed record that much more incredible. |
Originally Posted by Matt Trulio
(Post 4850636)
You've forgotten more about drag boat racing than I will ever know, Dale, but my answer to your final question would be no way. The course would extend the risk exposure for far too long in a tiny, massively powered 20-footer.
All this discussion makes Ken Warby's 317-mph water-speed record that much more incredible. |
Originally Posted by Matt Trulio
(Post 4850636)
You've forgotten more about drag boat racing than I will ever know, Dale, but my answer to your final question would be no way. The course would extend the risk exposure for far too long in a tiny, massively powered 20-footer.
All this discussion makes Ken Warby's 317-mph water-speed record that much more incredible. There's the challenge, isn't it? Making it the whole mile in whatever conditions Mother Nature decides to throw at you. The Mystics seem to be the vessel best suited for this. Ken Warby was riding a rocket and skimming it across the water. Impressive, to be sure, but he wasn't propelling git with a prop in the water. Thanks. Brad. (937)545-8991 |
Originally Posted by Interceptor
(Post 4850632)
I'm thinking the easier path to breaking the LOTO record is to go small with an unlimited hydroplane.
Originally Posted by Skater30
(Post 4850633)
If you guys are going to dream, dream big. Just build a 50' Mystic with a pair of Rolls Royce T-56 turbines with almost 6,000 shp, weigh just under 2,000#s and are 12' long and 27" in diameter. Have BPM custom build a set of drives capable of handling the power and Rolla build you a set of forged props. The turbines alone will set you back $5M, add another $5M for the one-off custom boat/rigging/testing and for a cool $10M you can probably go break Spirit of Qatar's record (if you live through it). I honestly don't think we'll ever see that record broken. I don't think you'll ever see somebody willing to outspend them, or that doesn't value their life enough to chase that record. Basically similar reasons we see other long standing boat speed records not broken (ultimate world speed record and outboard speed record). Interesting thread though!
"If you live through it"..... Probably the biggest limiting factor, to be honest. Thanks. Brad. (937)545-8991 |
Originally Posted by Brad Christy
(Post 4850639)
Personally, I think the easiest way is to start with existing boats and engines that will easily shoehorn into it and don't cost a small country to buy. It's attainable. It's just out of reach for most of us.
"If you live through it"..... Probably the biggest limiting factor, to be honest. Thanks. Brad. (937)545-8991 https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...88f9471bf3.jpg |
Originally Posted by Interceptor
(Post 4850632)
I'm thinking the easier path to breaking the LOTO record is to go small with an unlimited hydroplane.
They were banned after Miss Bud was on display and then suddenly entered to win and keep the Top Gun trophy at LOTO in 2002. |
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...9d95324d5f.jpg
Growing up in New Orleans Al Copeland was larger than life. I’ll never forget this race in 1984 , I was 14 and I was hoooked and said “one day “ that would be me . I’m still chasing that day . The race shop I passed every work day on my way to work . This poster is original and is hung in the waiting area where I work . When ever I feel as that day is slipping away I look to that art on the wall . I remember that race as vividly as the day it took place . Thanks Al . |
Originally Posted by Griff
(Post 4850643)
Hydroplanes are not allowed to compete in the Shootout.
They were banned after Miss Bud was on display and then suddenly entered to win and keep the Top Gun trophy at LOTO in 2002. |
Originally Posted by pslonaker
(Post 4850464)
my friend, outlaw transport says that there are two engines still in the boat and it is owned by a charity now and will be used for promotional usage. The charity is www.greenfieldreserve.com he send me videos and pictures but I can not post them they will not upload I tried
|
Qatar did it in a mile, course is now 3/4 mile. Although apparently Qatar was slowing down in the traps.
|
Originally Posted by Griff
(Post 4850643)
Hydroplanes are not allowed to compete in the Shootout.
They were banned after Miss Bud was on display and then suddenly entered to win and keep the Top Gun trophy at LOTO in 2002. |
Since we've taken a short hydroplane detour, these are hanging in my office. Miss Bud is signed by Bernie Little and Tom D'Eath, Smokin' Joe's is signed by Mark Tate.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...ad8d0e5653.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...c1a92cd6a7.jpg |
Originally Posted by Hustler40
(Post 4850656)
how exactly does a turbine engine boat promote wildlife conservation?
More importantly, How does an electric car promote protect the environment ? :) |
Originally Posted by Hustler40
(Post 4850656)
how exactly does a turbine engine boat promote wildlife conservation?
|
Originally Posted by Knot 4 Me
(Post 4850660)
I was there and it was awesome! I think Dave Villwock ran 199 that day.
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...729cfba27f.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...f9c176fe38.jpg |
Originally Posted by IGetWet
(Post 4850473)
oh and it weighed 35,000lbs
Since Phenomenon is being compared to Mystics. Anyone know what Spirit of Qatar weighed? |
C5000R Mystic dry weight advertised was 10,500 pounds...Qatar was a bit heavier than other 5000R (ie My Way)as the layup was heavier around the cockpit - actual hull was the same layup
|
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4850680)
Display to gather crowds ?
More importantly, How does an electric car promote protect the environment ? :) I don’t drink the electric car look aid. Im glad someone is doing something with the boat. Saw it in key west when it was finished. Was hoping the boat would meet its goals and get the record. Just seems like a really odd choice of advertising for a conservation group. “Come see the back of the boat. We call these big props manatee back scratchers. Save the animals!” |
I lnow this is an old thread, I just saw it. I think some of the twin engine rumors were from me. I contacted Scott who was selling the boat for copeland Jr. I went and looked at the boat a few times we talked numbers with having him install two of the T-55's.
Shortly after we spoke someone else came a long wanting the boat with all 4 engines installed and put a down payment on it. Scott got the boat going again with all 4 engines installed, I was told it was being shipped overseas, but it stayed stateside. As far as I know the boat is running and driving, its owned by a charity now, theyre planning to make lotto one of these years. I still kick myself in the butt for not giving him a deposit the day I was there, the boat was a steal with two engines. |
Last I heard it was heading to Georgia, but that was a couple of years ago and I’m not sure if it actually went or not.
|
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...72bcd8237e.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...75b95f3d69.jpg It's a lot of boat, definitely worth checking out. These are from Sarasota. |
is that a recent pic where did it end up?
|
Originally Posted by boostbros
(Post 4925548)
is that a recent pic where did it end up?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.