![]() |
MoTeC Making A Deep Dive Into High-Performance Outboards
A true power move, https://speedonthewater.com/motec-ma...nce-outboards/
|
Impressive price at $6k but also impressive gains on the supercharged motors. And also the only game in town now that the stock ECUs are locked down. Someone with time and tech knowledge and could make one of the dyi ECUs work, but then what is your time worth.
|
those cheap ecus have come a long ways in the last few years they run from 150 to 600
|
Is it for 1 ECU $6k?
|
motec is not new to the boating world its been underground for a while and is a great company, theres really cheap computer hardware becoming available for stock engines self learning its come a long ways in a few years when i needed a stock computer for a evinrude 200 ficht it was over 7000 and would not sell you one you had to send the mouse damaged one back first it, must be hard now that they shut down? and no longer available
|
Ecu tune
Originally Posted by boostbros
(Post 4942890)
motec is not new to the boating world its been underground for a while and is a great company, theres really cheap computer hardware becoming available for stock engines self learning its come a long ways in a few years when i needed a stock computer for a evinrude 200 ficht it was over 7000 and would not sell you one you had to send the mouse damaged one back first it, must be hard now that they shut down? and no longer available
|
When I was getting into Fuel injection I went to PRI .. Holley was expensive but resonable. Motec was 6x the price. I didn`tthink it was 6x better . It`s better but not worth the price and lots of Holley how to`s on Youtube and tech help. None of that with GoldTec. You`re on your own.
|
Ecu upgrade
Originally Posted by hogie roll
(Post 4942803)
Impressive price at $6k but also impressive gains on the supercharged motors. And also the only game in town now that the stock ECUs are locked down. Someone with time and tech knowledge and could make one of the dyi ECUs work, but then what is your time worth.
|
Originally Posted by 39TGO
(Post 4942901)
I think people will not spend this money for barely 50 hp considered but most of those people don’t have that kind of money
|
Originally Posted by 39TGO
(Post 4942901)
most of those people don’t have that kind of money
|
Originally Posted by Markus
(Post 4942911)
If you can afford two to five 500Rs and a transom to attach them to, you can afford a set of ECUs for those 500Rs.
|
I think we have different definitions of can afford.
|
Originally Posted by Markus
(Post 4942920)
I think we have different definitions of can afford.
|
its also way cheaper to slap new decals on theres twice as many 500s on boats as merc actually built!
|
Ecu upgrade
Originally Posted by Markus
(Post 4942911)
If you can afford two to five 500Rs and a transom to attach them to, you can afford a set of ECUs for those 500Rs.
|
Originally Posted by 39TGO
(Post 4942943)
So I was not actually talking about people that have boats with 500 R’s, was talking about people that have a fishing boat or a center console 115 or 200 hp!
|
Originally Posted by SecondWind
(Post 4942936)
That's fair, I just know a few folks here in the states who own expensive boats that can't afford to maintain them, it's probably a cultural thing.
Like the "How to survive on a $160,000 income" headline in the New York Times this weekend. |
Ecu tune
Originally Posted by Markus
(Post 4942949)
Didn't know that there were Motec ECUs for those engines.
|
Well, yeah, in that case, better to get a set of bigger engines.
However, if your name is Warren and you want to make the fastest 28 Skater in the world even faster and Mercury does not sell any bigger V8 engines, Motec ECUs are the ticket... |
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4942895)
When I was getting into Fuel injection I went to PRI .. Holley was expensive but resonable. Motec was 6x the price. I didn`tthink it was 6x better . It`s better but not worth the price and lots of Holley how to`s on Youtube and tech help. None of that with GoldTec. You`re on your own.
|
Originally Posted by c0ncEpT
(Post 4943490)
Except the MoTeC is 6x more powerful than a Holley. With the Holley your restricted to modifying the parameters available via their software. With the MoTec it allows you to add your own Tables, Parameters and Channels. It lets the user define how the ECU operates. That's why you see them in these applications.
Full disclosure.... My experience is with the HP, which is not even Holley's most powerful unit, and I'm not doing the tuning myself, so I'm not intimately familiar myself. I have a guy that knows the Holley stuff, and several other ECM systems, inside and out that does that for me. I've watched him work with my ECM, and he's tried explaining most of it to me as he goes. We've talked about what it will do; the functionality that it has that I'm not even remotely tapping into. Pretty sure Holley allows you to build your own tables for whatever you need and assign functions and parameters to those tables. I'm not sure why anyone would want more control than the Holley allows. I can't, for the life of me, wrap my head around the notion that Holley "restricts" anything of any use in any way. Just my 2 cents.... Thanks. Brad. |
Do any of these systems have the ability to hold RPM consistent in rough water? Essentially taking the human factor of throttling the boat out of the equation? I would think a computer would be able to react to the loading and unloading a lot faster than any human could.
|
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 4943503)
Do any of these systems have the ability to hold RPM consistent in rough water? Essentially taking the human factor of throttling the boat out of the equation? I would think a computer would be able to react to the loading and unloading a lot faster than any human could.
I would think it would have to be done with ignition advance unless you incorporated DTC. I wouldn’t think you’d want to deviate that much from an ideal advance. But I do know that the Holley system has capacity for DTC. The cool thing about that is that it eliminates the need for IAC, as it’s just incorporated into DTC. Thanks. Brad. |
Motec and Holley aren't even in the same universe.
|
Originally Posted by underpsi68
(Post 4943519)
Motec and Holley aren't even in the same universe.
Key Comparison for BoatsHolley ECUs (e.g., Terminator X / Terminator X Max, HP, Dominator) are popular in the marine world for their affordability, user-friendliness, and solid performance in many boat setups. MoTeC (particularly the M1 series) is a premium, high-end option favored in professional or extreme marine racing environments.Here's a breakdown of the main differences based on user experiences, forums, and marine-specific discussions:
Bottom Line
|
Ive thought about this in the past
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 4943503)
Do any of these systems have the ability to hold RPM consistent in rough water? Essentially taking the human factor of throttling the boat out of the equation? I would think a computer would be able to react to the loading and unloading a lot faster than any human could.
Understanding the ProblemIn rough water, when a boat's propellers (props) exit the water, the engine experiences a sudden loss of load, causing RPMs to spike rapidly (over-revving). Upon re-entry, the sudden torque load can stress the drivetrain, engine, and props. Manually throttling back helps, but an automated ECU solution can detect this unload condition and intervene by limiting RPM, retarding timing, cutting spark/fuel, or modulating throttle (if using drive-by-wire, DBW). Your idea of a driveshaft (or prop shaft) speed sensor is spot-on—it can detect rapid RPM acceleration (rate of change, or dRPM/dt) or mismatches between engine RPM and shaft speed, triggering protection.Both Holley and MoTeC ECUs can handle this, but MoTeC's advanced programmability makes it more flexible for custom marine strategies. Holley is more user-friendly and affordable for basic setups. Neither has a "plug-and-play" prop unload feature, but you can configure one using sensors, inputs/outputs (I/O), and logic. Always consult a professional tuner, as marine environments require waterproofing and robust wiring. General Setup Approach
Holley ECU Setup (e.g., Terminator X Max, HP, or Dominator)Holley excels in affordability and ease but lacks built-in RPM rate-of-change limiting. You can approximate it with rev limiters, advanced I/O, and custom logic. For boats, use marine-certified kits (e.g., with sealed harnesses).
MoTeC ECU Setup (e.g., M1 Series or MCM112 Marine Kit)MoTeC is premium and highly customizable, ideal for pro marine racing (e.g., Mercury outboards). The MCM112 plug-in kit for Mercury 200-500R engines supports prop speed sensors natively, making it perfect for unload detection. Use M1 Tune software for configuration.
Recommendation
|
Originally Posted by underpsi68
(Post 4943519)
Motec and Holley aren't even in the same universe.
Motec is plug and play with the DTS. Plug it in and go. Big gains on a stock engine with a pretty mild tuneup. |
MoTecs cost the same or less then a 2nd set of propellers. You will never recognize a better gain for the money, their support is incredible, and its up to you how far you choose to push the envelope "knowing that everything has a breaking point".
Joe |
On the non-supercharged outboards, how are they getting more power out of them? Are these newer 4-strokes just that conservatively tuned from the factory?
|
Also, on the newer Merc V8's, how much can the rev limiter be raised without sacrificing reliability?
|
The non-supercharged motors are set up very conservatively. They, "Mercury", is not interested in paying warranty claims and wants to have very reliable motors out in the market. They are sent to the consumer with timing and fuel curves that recommend the use of 87 octane fuel. Increased timing and modified fuel curves allow for output gains with increased octane use.
My personal experience shows that running motors with increased timing, increased boost, 93 octane fuel, and sustained runs, (25 miles at W.O.T.), I would not turn them over 6800. Shorter burst, better fuel, have allowed guys to turn them up into the 7300 range but they won't live long doing that outside of short burst. Rod bolts, head gaskets, rods and stretching head bolts seem to be the first breaking points. Any modification voids all warranty coverage as it should.... Joe |
Sounds like a good way to make the reliable OB into the same thing as a modified BBC. Just much easier to replace and work on.
Originally Posted by JPEROG
(Post 4943617)
The non-supercharged motors are set up very conservatively. They, "Mercury", is not interested in paying warranty claims and wants to have very reliable motors out in the market. They are sent to the consumer with timing and fuel curves that recommend the use of 87 octane fuel. Increased timing and modified fuel curves allow for output gains with increased octane use.
My personal experience shows that running motors with increased timing, increased boost, 93 octane fuel, and sustained runs, (25 miles at W.O.T.), I would not turn them over 6800. Shorter burst, better fuel, have allowed guys to turn them up into the 7300 range but they won't live long doing that outside of short burst. Rod bolts, head gaskets, rods and stretching head bolts seem to be the first breaking points. Any modification voids all warranty coverage as it should.... Joe |
I had 400 hours on my powerhead and it was fine. We ran a 139 pass at the shootout and decided to swing for the fence with nitrous in order to run with Justin and Warren but the rods didn't agree. I plan to run motec on the new boat but I will have good internals before it gets turned up beyond the numbers that I mentioned.
Joe |
Originally Posted by JPEROG
(Post 4943684)
I had 400 hours on my powerhead and it was fine. We ran a 139 pass at the shootout and decided to swing for the fence with nitrous in order to run with Justin and Warren but the rods didn't agree. I plan to run motec on the new boat but I will have good internals before it gets turned up beyond the numbers that I mentioned.
Joe |
Mine was extreme. It broke rods, and windowed the block in a few places beyond repair. A new 500 powerhead is around 25K, and the supercharger is around 12K if you go new. Unfortunately, mine spit parts through the supercharger base plate and into the rotors as well. The good news is that when you have one modified for upgraded internals, the block and crank are the only parts that stay stock. So if you have a good block, crank, and heads you can send it off.
Joe |
Originally Posted by JPEROG
(Post 4943686)
Mine was extreme. It broke rods, and windowed the block in a few places beyond repair. A new 500 powerhead is around 25K, and the supercharger is around 12K if you go new. Unfortunately, mine spit parts through the supercharger base plate and into the rotors as well. The good news is that when you have one modified for upgraded internals, the block and crank are the only parts that stay stock. So if you have a good block, crank, and heads you can send it off.
Joe But for the wise folks, upgrading the internals before they break is certainly attractive. Compared to the price of a 300XS powerhead and the price out the IMI factory gate of a supercharger, 25K and 12K aren't too bad, btw. |
Originally Posted by JPEROG
(Post 4943686)
Mine was extreme. It broke rods, and windowed the block in a few places beyond repair. A new 500 powerhead is around 25K, and the supercharger is around 12K if you go new. Unfortunately, mine spit parts through the supercharger base plate and into the rotors as well. The good news is that when you have one modified for upgraded internals, the block and crank are the only parts that stay stock. So if you have a good block, crank, and heads you can send it off.
Joe |
My guess is in the 750 hp range and then we threw a 70 hp shot of N20 at them. We had fuel pumps that were rated at 700 hp and we were still lean on the fuel tables without the additional fuel required for N20. We went to 1000 hp pumps to bring the AFR back in line. This is also something that needs to be addressed when you turn the MoTecs up. The stock 4.6/450 fuel supply module will not support the fuel feed required. The 500 has an upgraded module that will potentially cover up to 650 hp, but my personal experience indicated a change was required.
Joe |
Doesn't surprise me that the fuel supply doesn't keep up. You are pass the 125% design rule of thumb. Cool that that amount of power is available out of 4.6L.
He!! that means 600 could be a pretty reliable package. Are there any stroker kits out yet? I wonder if the KONG 1000's are stock size.
Originally Posted by JPEROG
(Post 4943711)
My guess is in the 750 hp range and then we threw a 70 hp shot of N20 at them. We had fuel pumps that were rated at 700 hp and we were still lean on the fuel tables without the additional fuel required for N20. We went to 1000 hp pumps to bring the AFR back in line. This is also something that needs to be addressed when you turn the MoTecs up. The stock 4.6/450 fuel supply module will not support the fuel feed required. The 500 has an upgraded module that will potentially cover up to 650 hp, but my personal experience indicated a change was required.
Joe |
There will be guys go going well beyond what I ever intend to. I want to use my boat on a daily basis with pump fuel. There are turbo motors on E85 being built that should be in the 1200 hp range. Outboard performance is just getting started.
Joe |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.