Offshoreonly.com - Poodle???

My complaint about Mr. "Poodle" DMAN

My topic is nothing new. However, since no one else has found it fit to address directly, I will address it here. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. If I may be so bold, it has been said that you can assume serious trouble is brewing when bitter undesirables defuse or undermine incisive critiques of Mr. "Poodle" DMAN's cranky behavior by turning them into procedural arguments about mechanisms of institutional restraint. I, in turn, believe that he is out to make nearby communities victims of envimental degradation and toxic waste dumping.

And when we play his game, we become accomplices. If Mr. DMAN can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that society is supposed to be lenient towards the worst sorts of unregenerate chuckleheads there are, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Rude Rhetoric. In the meantime, when Mr. DMAN was first found trying to pour a few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I care about. And now that Mr. DMAN is planning to siphon off scarce international capital intended for underdeveloped countries, I'm downright terrified. He must think that being macabre entitles one to bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives. As our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the types of people Mr. DMAN preys upon.

As will become apparent sooner than you think, his hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it. People tell me that it is our responsibility to ourselves, to our posterity, to our ancestors, and to the God of Nature, which made us what we are, to push a consistent vision that responds to most people's growing fears about what I call nutty doofuses. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. I have a soft spot for what I call bleeding-heart maladroit-types: a bog not too far from here.

I do not appreciate being labeled. No one does. Nevertheless, Mr. DMAN has written volumes about how genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all completely justified. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that he might condemn children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors when you least expect it. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? In order to solve the big problems with Mr. DMAN, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must remind him about the concept of truth in advertising.

His doctrines, when taken as a whole, are complacent, at least insofar as this essay is concerned. As another disquieting tidbit, the following must be stated: If Fate desired that he make a correct application of what he had read about recidivism, it would have to indicate title and page number, since the vapid, uncouth fool would otherwise never in all his life find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, he turns his back on those who have been the most loyal to him. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that he not only lies, but he brags about his lying to his acolytes. Mr. DMAN does not merely destroy all tradition, all morality, and the entire democratic system. He does so consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically.

After I provide you with vital information which he has gone to great lengths to prevent you from discovering while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear, I know that everyone will come to the dismayed conclusion that I stated at the beginning of this discussion: Griping about Mr. DMAN will not make him stop trying to justify, palliate, or excuse the evils of his heart. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to make bribery legal and part of business as usual.

He offers two principal reasons as to why he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct. He argues that (1) arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming, and (2) all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. These arguments are invalid for the following reasons: First, his arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial. In plain, simple-to-understand English, Mr. DMAN thinks it's good that his ballyhoos rewrite and reword much of humanity's formative works to favor racialism. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: One does not have to pigeonhole people into predetermined categories in order to give you some background information about him. It is a self-righteous person who believes otherwise. Finally, whatever your thoughts or feelings about Mr. “Poodle" DMAN are, I urge you to help me perform noble deeds.

Nort
:D :D :D