View Poll Results: IS going to WAR with Saddam the right thing ??
yes, he needs to be erradicated
62
32.98%
no, this isn't any of our business
14
7.45%
HE is a murderous tyrant who needs to be blown to bits.
106
56.38%
gasoline will shure be cheap !!
6
3.19%
Voters: 188. You may not vote on this poll
O.T. poll: should we oust Saddam
03-17-2003, 06:40 PM
#21
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dayton,OH/LakeCumberland,KY
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
french suport
The only problem is that we can not get French support for the war with Iraq and who is going to show the Iraqi’s how to surrender if the French are not involved.
Greed and money the American way I am just jealous because I am not of Bush buddies. It was not for those traits we could be socialist and some one else would be deciding if we need or more the American way needed a boat and it definitely would not be a decision between a fountain and formula.
North Korea just wants money not to go to war.
Greed and money the American way I am just jealous because I am not of Bush buddies. It was not for those traits we could be socialist and some one else would be deciding if we need or more the American way needed a boat and it definitely would not be a decision between a fountain and formula.
North Korea just wants money not to go to war.
03-17-2003, 06:54 PM
#22
VIP Member
VIP Member
We should have taken him out the last time we were there.
03-17-2003, 07:05 PM
#23
Charter Member
Originally posted by SteveS
If the old man had done the job right the first time his boy wouldn't have to do it now!
Lets pray for quick a war and safe return of our fighting boys - and oh ya, kick Saddam's ASS!
If the old man had done the job right the first time his boy wouldn't have to do it now!
Lets pray for quick a war and safe return of our fighting boys - and oh ya, kick Saddam's ASS!
As for the PRK, they are working on a big payday, not a big boom. They are a very small, hungry fish alone in a very big pond.
03-17-2003, 07:32 PM
#26
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Nine votes My God:
The anti-war crowd lives in a fantasy land, wishing for the "lemonade springs where the bluebird sings in the Big Rock Candy Mountain."
They are the ones who would prescribe a band-aid for lung cancer. They adhere to the ideology of pacifism because it permits them to appear concerned without inviting risk or accountability.
They march against war because it absolves them from admitting that the world is a harsh place. They flee from reality because to admit evil on the large scale would require that it be dealt with in our own politically correct social strata.
In short they are bull****..
The anti-war crowd lives in a fantasy land, wishing for the "lemonade springs where the bluebird sings in the Big Rock Candy Mountain."
They are the ones who would prescribe a band-aid for lung cancer. They adhere to the ideology of pacifism because it permits them to appear concerned without inviting risk or accountability.
They march against war because it absolves them from admitting that the world is a harsh place. They flee from reality because to admit evil on the large scale would require that it be dealt with in our own politically correct social strata.
In short they are bull****..
03-17-2003, 07:35 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
I have seen some people say NK isn't a threat..
They have nukes that can hit the US
They have threaned NY and Chicago
They have threatened the US with "death and destruction"
I guess you guys are just making excuses for a madman with the bomb
that is some dangerous and reckless thinking....and a HUGE gamble
They have nukes that can hit the US
They have threaned NY and Chicago
They have threatened the US with "death and destruction"
I guess you guys are just making excuses for a madman with the bomb
that is some dangerous and reckless thinking....and a HUGE gamble
03-17-2003, 07:40 PM
#29
YOU defend a MADMAN with a LOT of weapons and the will to use them. NK has no will to use the BIG ONE -- BECAUSE HE KNOWS WE HAVE A LOT MORE THAN HE DOES OF EVEN BIGGER ONES.
03-17-2003, 07:49 PM
#30
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
We know for a fact that if there were NO Iraqi threat, the Left would not be clamoring to go after North Korea militarily.
Now here is the crux of the liberal thinking ---->But BuuuuuT!!! Only if a DemocRatic President were in office!!! And needed a boost for himself and other Democrats in the polls, or a diversion from some scandal, and ONLY if it appeared to be an easy in and out, such as appeared to be the case in Bosnia and Kosovo, would the LEFT support an attack on anyone.
The Right is NOT being inconsistent here - does anyone really think that the Bush administration is going to sit back and allow North Korea to build and sell nuclear weapons??????????? The Left pretends not to understand why the Bush administration is not going after North Korea immediately;
because the Left truly won’t and does not WANT to understand - they would rather attack the Right as being inconsistent in order to drag down the approval ratings of Bush and the Republicans in Congress in a strictly political agenda.
Again Bull****!! ok ??
Now here is the crux of the liberal thinking ---->But BuuuuuT!!! Only if a DemocRatic President were in office!!! And needed a boost for himself and other Democrats in the polls, or a diversion from some scandal, and ONLY if it appeared to be an easy in and out, such as appeared to be the case in Bosnia and Kosovo, would the LEFT support an attack on anyone.
The Right is NOT being inconsistent here - does anyone really think that the Bush administration is going to sit back and allow North Korea to build and sell nuclear weapons??????????? The Left pretends not to understand why the Bush administration is not going after North Korea immediately;
because the Left truly won’t and does not WANT to understand - they would rather attack the Right as being inconsistent in order to drag down the approval ratings of Bush and the Republicans in Congress in a strictly political agenda.
Again Bull****!! ok ??
