Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Boating Discussion (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion-51/)
-   -   name for upcoming war? (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-boating-discussion/45790-name-upcoming-war.html)

H2Xmark 03-19-2003 07:06 PM

name for upcoming war?
 
alright we need a name for the war, my vote is" operation kick ass" anybody have something better? lets here it!!
I know you can come up with a winner here,
Mark:D :D

liquid asset 03-19-2003 07:12 PM

Operation **** Yall Up

timucin 03-19-2003 07:13 PM

'late again'

mopower 03-19-2003 07:36 PM

Iraqitack:rolleyes:


Countdown 20

TulsaLarry 03-19-2003 07:38 PM

Operation French Tickler

Why? Someones going to get F@#%d

Tinkerer 03-19-2003 07:43 PM

CAT --- You never do learn when to quit.

florida gator 03-19-2003 07:43 PM

Operation Kick The $hit Out Of The Phucking Iraqis.

bajabob38 03-19-2003 07:51 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I don't know what they will call it, but I do know we will use a lot of " Weapons of Mass Persuasion."!!!

thedonz 03-19-2003 07:54 PM

Operation Towelhead Whoopass

LapseofReason 03-19-2003 08:05 PM

Operation Slam Saddam.

VelocityMark 03-19-2003 08:06 PM


Originally posted by srobak
Catmando's Catastrophe
Catmando's Call To Shut The F@ck Up

I'll second that!!:mad:

Erie Desire 03-19-2003 08:10 PM

Operation.......



SADDAMIZE

Pantera1 03-19-2003 08:21 PM

OK
 
316

bojoe2 03-19-2003 09:50 PM

there all good

Erie Desire 03-19-2003 11:43 PM

Did I mispell Saddamy?:D


Now it's the beer talking:p :cool: :D

puder 03-20-2003 12:04 AM

Operation "Set a very bad prescident for countries like North Korea, India and Pakistan. So it now make sit OK for them to make pre-emptive strikes on thier precieved enemies tha may or may not have weapons of mass destruction, which india and pakistan BOTH have and are WILLING to use"

or is that too long and not catchey enough for TV?

That being said its begun and diplomacy failed. Bomb them back to the stone age. And lets see if we can this damn stock market stabailized. At least all teh uncertainty is over and teh upcommgin war taht has been "priced into" everythign for teh passed few months will eb over and we can start making a move to the upside and i can cash in on some purchases. :D

puder 03-20-2003 12:10 AM

lemme just clairifed my last statement before I get jumped on. Sadam Hussein is a madman and needs to be "taken care of" I just think perhaps a "secret assasination" might be better than a full frontal assaul tha make us loosk like the bad guys beating on eth oppressed iraq's (what a PR job they pulled, insane, meglomaniac, emperialistic madman turned into the empoverished defenseless opressed nation of sufferers)

Once agian to clarify I have no problem with the OBJECTIVES in this war i jsut hitnk the ware isn't needed to achieve them. But its the path we chose so we better hope those checmical biological weapons turn up when its all over.

at100plus 03-20-2003 01:02 AM

Pardon me
 
This is not a "pre emptive strike"

It is a resumption of war, and we have full authority under international law to do so.

Gulf War I Treaty signed by Saddam Hussein in 1991 said that Saddam must give full cooperation to UN and eliminate his arsenal of certain weapons.

HE HAS DONE NEITHER.

Under international law, if you violate a war treaty, war resumes to defend the principles of that treaty.

THIS IS A R E S U M P T I O N OF the 1991 Gulf War


Time to finish the job.

Oh yea, lets not forget 17 UN resolutions and 12 years of trying to figure out how to make Saddam comply without resuming war. The 17th resolution was a unanimous vote (France included) of the UN Security council to use military force if Saddam did not comply.

X-Rated30 03-20-2003 08:04 AM

I like "Gulf War - Version 1.2".

BTW - I am a lifelong Republican and I grew up in Texas. Nevertheless, I think Bush has f---ed this thing up to no end. But while I disagree with how they ended up in this war, I unquestioningly support out troops, and can't wait to see them kick some A$$.

I'm with Puder -- let's just hope it helps the economy (where the President should have declared war to begin with).:hothead: :puppy:

Playn 03-20-2003 08:16 AM

Re: Pardon me
 

Originally posted by at100plus
This is not a "pre emptive strike"

It is a resumption of war, and we have full authority under international law to do so.

Gulf War I Treaty signed by Saddam Hussein in 1991 said that Saddam must give full cooperation to UN and eliminate his arsenal of certain weapons.

HE HAS DONE NEITHER.

Under international law, if you violate a war treaty, war resumes to defend the principles of that treaty.

THIS IS A R E S U M P T I O N OF the 1991 Gulf War


Time to finish the job.

Oh yea, lets not forget 17 UN resolutions and 12 years of trying to figure out how to make Saddam comply without resuming war. The 17th resolution was a unanimous vote (France included) of the UN Security council to use military force if Saddam did not comply.

Absolutely 100% correct!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.