Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
You thought your motor was big! >

You thought your motor was big!

Notices

You thought your motor was big!

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-10-2003, 05:41 AM
  #11  
GLH
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
GLH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 15,272
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Hey Ray how's the 47 Project going??? engines ??? This engine might fit in there from the bilge I saw!!!!
GLH is offline  
Old 05-10-2003, 06:18 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
26scarab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: st. clair shores mi ,us
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I saw some of that show.
Did you see how big that shipyard was ? They do everything from actually making the steel from ore to the final ship.
26scarab is offline  
Old 05-10-2003, 06:59 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Dredgeking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

we just pulled an engine about half that size out of one of our dredges. we blew it up due to an oil failure somewhere. they aren't meant to be swapped out often. that one had been in the dredge for 40 years.
Dredgeking is offline  
Old 05-10-2003, 07:35 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
convincor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 532
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

at 100 rpm peak hp, going to need some serious pitch on the prop.
convincor is offline  
Old 05-10-2003, 08:02 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chesaning, Mi
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How Did They Machine The Crank, I Would Like To See The Lath That Turned It...

Jeff
neu-rich is offline  
Old 05-10-2003, 08:28 AM
  #16  
Official OSO boat whore
Charter Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mequon, WI
Posts: 6,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was on a cruise many years ago. I put a written request into the engineering and they took me on a tour of the ships engineering spaces. The engine room was absolutely incredible! Theirs was a bit smaller than the one pictured above-it was only 5 cylinders. Even so, the engine was 3 decks high. It turned so slowly that it looked like you could just reach out and stop the crank with your bare hand. The pistons were like 6' tall. They kept a spare one in the engine room. There was a overhead bridge crane for installing it! There were windows so that you could look through a porthole and see the crank spinning inside the engine! There were also doors that could be removed so a person could get INTO the crank case! You could feel each and every piston fire. The engine turned a constant rpm. I think that one was turning 150rpm. When a piston fired you could feel it through the entire ship. Consider the amount of mass in a ship that needs to resonate and you'll get an idea. They would speed the boat up or reverse it by changing the pitch of the props. The engine consumed some 55 gallons per mile of diesel fuel.
Cord is offline  
Old 05-10-2003, 08:39 AM
  #17  
Ginger or Mary Ann?
Charter Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
US1 Fountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: L
Posts: 11,029
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

More info:


German design, Japanese labour, American paint...............

The Wartsila NSD (Sulzer) RTA96-C two-stroke diesel engine is the most
powerful and most efficient piston prime-mover in the world today.
Bore - just under 3'2" (965mm).
Stroke - just over 8'2" (2489mm).

Available in 6 through 12 cylinder versions (all inline).
Engine weight exceeds 2000 tons in the 12 cylinder version (the
crankshaft alone exceeds 300 tons).

Point of maximum continuous power is 89,640 HP (66,844kW) at 100RPM
with the 12 cylinder version.
Point of maximum fuel economy is 53,244 HP (37,704kW) at 90 RPM.

The 12-cylinder engine exceeded 100,000 horsepower during overspeed
testing (all of 101.5 RPM!) while under test at Japan's Diesel Union
works (who built the first engines and from who these pictures are
taken).

Fuel consumption at maximum power is 0.278 lbs/HP/hour (BSFC).
Fuel consumption at maximum economy is 0.260 lbs/HP/hour.

At maximum economy the Sulzer engine exceeds 50% thermal efficiency
i.e. more than 50% of the fuel going into the engine is converted to
power).
For comparison, consider that automotive and small aircraft
spark-ignition engines have British Standard Fuel Consumption figures iin
the 0.40-0.60 lbs/HP/hour range and 25-30% thermal efficiency.

Even at its most efficient power setting, the Sulzer 12 cylinder
consumes nearly 1,660 gallons of heavy fuel oil an hour.
US1 Fountain is offline  
Old 05-10-2003, 09:19 AM
  #18  
Diamond Member #001
Charter Member
iTrader: (2)
 
C_Spray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Coastal North Carolina
Posts: 4,808
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Just for grins......

100,000 hp @ 101.5 rpm = 5,172,413.7 ft-lbs of torque.

Yes - 5.17 MILLION ft-lbs.
__________________
Retired! Boating full-time now.
C_Spray is offline  
Old 05-10-2003, 09:32 AM
  #19  
Registered
 
Shorgasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the back of a chicks M3..If you're gonna ride my ass at least pull my hair!!
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Umm......could ya imagine that thing throwin a rod....

Or how about making the decision to run Synthetic or petro oil....
Shorgasm is offline  
Old 05-10-2003, 09:38 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
LapseofReason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Stafford Va.
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's like looking at porno for boat's,It's so BIG.
LapseofReason is offline  


Quick Reply: You thought your motor was big!


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.