Notices

Pulse Drive vs Arneson ?

Old 07-10-2003, 07:47 PM
  #1  
Byron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pulse Drive vs Arneson ?

Just asking what everone thinks about these two drives. I've picked the Arneson setup on my new Spectre 36' over the Pulse. The pulse looked to bulky and add on. I thought the Arneson was a cleaner look and a more experienced company. Just wondering your thoughts.
 
Old 07-16-2003, 09:43 AM
  #2  
1975 X-18 Donzi, Arneson
Platinum Member
 
GEOO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: CT
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Arneson, proven, been around a long time, larger network world wide dealers & suppliers, easy to get parts. Many sizes and custom parts available.
GEOO is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 11:04 AM
  #3  
Charter Member#350
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Remember that my Pulse Drive looks "bulky" because it is a double shaft/propeller system. In your case it is going to be a single system on each side.
If your engine hatch opens to the sides (split engine hatch) you can actually step into the Pulse Drive to look and work on the rear section of your engines.
The swim platform and the rudder of the Pulse Drive will protect your propeller if you go to shallow or if you hit a marina wall going in reverse.
Catmando is right on his comments and the last reason is (look at photo)
Attached Thumbnails Pulse Drive vs Arneson ?-imongo.jpg  
Zero Cavity is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 11:26 AM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ST. Louis, MO, USA
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The pulse looks to be a simple, straitforward design. Anyone in boating has to like that.
My only concern id the tranny. The arneson transfers trust to the transom. The pulse puts the trust on the tranny. These tranny were made to handle that, so that's not the problem.
My question relates to the trimming mechanism design. The pulse looks like it puts the Ujoint on the tranny output flange. This will result in some off center thrust being transferred to the tranny. Most IB tranny are only designed for thrust parallel to the output shaft. For those who have worked in IB boats, prop shaft misallignment results in a similar situation. The result of that is premature output bearing and seal failure in the tranny.
I would just check with the tranny manufacturer would reccomend this type of installation.
My $0.02
Gary
Gary Anderson is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 12:08 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
dreamboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Are these drives priced similar to each other? How do they compare in price to #6?
dreamboater is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 01:00 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
GregP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Annapolis MD
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They are both essentially FREE if your comparing to a #6 drive

-Greg
GregP is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 01:10 PM
  #7  
Charter Mod
Charter Member
 
BLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: E Dock
Posts: 6,551
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally posted by GregP
They are both essentially FREE if your comparing to a #6 drive

-Greg
LOL They can also handle more power than a 6.
BLee is offline  
Old 07-17-2003, 04:22 PM
  #8  
PULSEDRIVE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gary

The problem with a misaligned IB drive shaft is the vibration not the off center trust, running through a single Ujoint minimizes vibration, saving the bearings and seals on the tranny.

99% of all our applications are run with ZF trannys, Hi HP applications we have Huber up grades done to the ZFs
All come with full warranty

Pulse Drive makes 23 different drives.
Drives come in singles, twins, triples and quads.

Parts are carried in 32 different countries and adding everyday

our engineering team have been working with surface drives since the '60

If anyone has any questions feel free to contact me directly

Tony

954 788 0810
 
Old 07-17-2003, 04:38 PM
  #9  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Steve 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Another point is the Horsepower Loss on a # 6 what would be the prop-shaft Horse-power of say a 600 HP engine

560-550 ? thats a big price to pay ..also on those toy bravos that need the water cooling whats that all about?? LOL Oh do you know heat generated by friction is the most costly..That BTW in terms of required energy input.
Steve 1 is offline  
Old 07-17-2003, 05:01 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
KNOT-RIGHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Providence,RI
Posts: 3,359
Received 156 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

I Have had excellent luck with Arnesons

There proven and durable!!

Just my 2 cents


How ya like these eggbeaters!!
Attached Thumbnails Pulse Drive vs Arneson ?-dscn0182.jpg  
KNOT-RIGHT is offline  

Quick Reply: Pulse Drive vs Arneson ?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.