Notices

NO More dB Testing in NJ

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-10-2003, 06:24 AM
  #1  
OSO Content Provider
Commercial Member
Thread Starter
 
SHARKEY-IMAGES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sharkey-Images.com
Posts: 19,731
Received 49 Likes on 23 Posts
NO More dB Testing in NJ

Thank you Roger Brown & the NJBRC...

Letter from the Asbury Park Press 8-8-03
Noise testing had to change
I would like to respond to several articles printed lately concerning boating noise and speed.
The Boat Regulation Commission takes umbrage to the remark by William deCamp Jr. of Save Barnegat Bay, stating that "A step was taken backward today" after our July 9 meeting. He was referring to noise regulation 13:82-4.2 (a), which states: "No person shall operate or give permission for the operation of any vessel or watercraft capable of emitting noise totaling in excess of 90 dba in or upon the waters of this state."

In order to check the allowable decibel level, it was required that the boat being checked would pass by the Police Boat at the highest speed possible. This was so dangerous that senior officers would not allow it. The second method used checked the boat at a dock, with the motor at "the lowest throttle setting in neutral gear." This could not produce conclusive results and has been discontinued.

Regulation 13:82-4.3 on muffling devices states: "Every outboard motor, inboard or inboard/outboard motor in use or attached to a vessel operating on the waters of this state shall be equipped with a muffling system as supplied by the manufacturer or installed by the owners."

As the pass-by and the dock test did not produce the results needed, it was suggested by the commission that all reference to the dba testing be removed from the regulations. The muffler requirement is to remain.

At the same time, the State Police have been placing "slow speed-no wake" buoys where needed. We believe that these two methods will both quiet the boats and also slow then down where necessary.

This was not the step backward. It was to clean up the regulations to obtain the results needed.

Roger Brown
CHAIRMAN
N.J. STATE BOAT REGULATION COMMISSION
__________________
www.TimSharkey.com/

Digital Photography & Video one BYTE at a time !
SHARKEY-IMAGES is offline  
Old 08-10-2003, 06:59 AM
  #2  
Charter Member #232
Charter Member
 
Audiofn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Carlisle, MA USA
Posts: 18,422
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Well that is good to hear. Sounds like they figured out that some things are better left undone. Not many boats would have passed a 90DB at WOT test, even pleasure cruisers. I would have liked to see them test my buddy's sport fisher at WOT. They would have been flipped by the wave that comes off the boat
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Old 08-10-2003, 07:13 AM
  #3  
Charter Member #1055/Moderator
Charter Member
iTrader: (1)
 
GO4BROKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: CNY
Posts: 4,585
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Excellent news!!
__________________
[img][/img]
GO4BROKE is offline  
Old 08-10-2003, 09:01 AM
  #4  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
CAP071's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 16,435
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thank God soemone made a decision
CAP071 is offline  
Old 08-10-2003, 09:46 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
Formula Outlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: In the Mountains
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Government making an intelligent decision? I don't think I'm quite ready for this. Must be a dream.
Formula Outlaw is offline  
Old 08-10-2003, 10:25 AM
  #6  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Lucididee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: ID
Posts: 7,954
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: NO More dB Testing in NJ

Originally posted by sharkeymarine
In order to check the allowable decibel level, it was required that the boat being checked would pass by the Police Boat at the highest speed possible. This was so dangerous that senior officers would not allow it.
Ya think!?!?
Lucididee is offline  
Old 08-10-2003, 03:00 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
BODYSHOT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Freehold, NJ. USA
Posts: 5,367
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
..glad they weren't out yesterday while we were testing!!

..no mufflers here....
BODYSHOT1 is offline  
Old 08-10-2003, 04:16 PM
  #8  
OSO Content Provider
Commercial Member
Thread Starter
 
SHARKEY-IMAGES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sharkey-Images.com
Posts: 19,731
Received 49 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally posted by BODYSHOT1
..glad they weren't out yesterday while we were testing!!

..no mufflers here....
That was you Marty?
Damn that thing sounds awesome!!!
__________________
www.TimSharkey.com/

Digital Photography & Video one BYTE at a time !
SHARKEY-IMAGES is offline  
Old 08-10-2003, 04:31 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
BODYSHOT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Freehold, NJ. USA
Posts: 5,367
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up Thanks Shark!

..now if we can just make it thru a race!!..hope you can stop-by the pits Thurs, race is Friday...

Marty

BODYSHOT1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skaterdave
OPA/The Jersey Boyz
2
05-22-2008 08:40 AM
purnell
OPA/The Jersey Boyz
3
09-02-2006 12:49 AM
OPBMiniatures
Baja
2
02-21-2003 09:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: NO More dB Testing in NJ


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.