OT - Spellcheck?

Subscribe
09-17-2003 | 02:51 PM
  #1  
Hmmm...

I guess we can forget about spell check now.

Fascinating....

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
Reply 0
09-17-2003 | 02:55 PM
  #2  
That may be true, but poor spelling makes you look like an idiot.
Reply 0
09-17-2003 | 05:22 PM
  #3  
Phanton, i've been been saying that for years now!!!!!
Reply 0
09-17-2003 | 06:31 PM
  #4  
Re: OT - Spellcheck?
Quote:
Originally posted by Phantom1
Hmmm...

I guess we can forget about spell check now.

Fascinating....

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
WOW ... I read that with no porbelm
I msut be uesd to puder
Reply 0