Apache 47 for a decent number.
Maybe it went through rehab in 1998?
02-10-2004, 01:53 PM
#15
LOOK AT THE LEAD NOW!!!!!
Platinum Member
Will,
Be sure to let me know when you are heading down to pick up yours buddy. Would love to take the ride and split the driving privledges.
Be sure to let me know when you are heading down to pick up yours buddy. Would love to take the ride and split the driving privledges.
02-10-2004, 01:54 PM
#16
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kankakee Illinois
Posts: 3,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I heard that the original hull was damaged and that Mark McMannus built a new hull for it. Hence the ''98'' designation.
If anyone has any different info, please chime in.
If anyone has any different info, please chime in.
02-10-2004, 02:23 PM
#18
Charter Mod
Charter MemberThread Starter
Originally posted by PatriYacht
A Black Thunder will go faster than that with 2 engines that size.
A Black Thunder will go faster than that with 2 engines that size.
02-10-2004, 03:18 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Geeezzz
Originally posted by LEOPAJM
Anyone wanna guess what that thing weighs !!??!!
And ... once you put enough thunder to it to make it go ... I'm not sure 400 gallons is enough fuel cap,. !!!
COOL to look at though !!!!
Anyone wanna guess what that thing weighs !!??!!
And ... once you put enough thunder to it to make it go ... I'm not sure 400 gallons is enough fuel cap,. !!!
COOL to look at though !!!!
Personally i'm all about the horn 
02-10-2004, 03:22 PM
#20
Registered
The weight difference isn't that great. With 3 525's in a BT the weights would be close but the BT would run upper 70's. It's a faster hull. Not that I meen to start an argument about which hull is the best, but if you're bargain hunting for a pleasure boat this Apache is imho not a good choice. To make this boat run well would take too much money. There's another 47 with 3 900's and a nice paint job in Boat Trader for 185,000 that looks like a better deal.
Last edited by PatriYacht; 02-10-2004 at 03:44 PM.
