Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Q & A (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q-20/)
-   -   TRS vs Bravo (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/111427-trs-vs-bravo.html)

Clay Washington 08-31-2005 09:59 AM

TRS vs Bravo
 
How do you feel about TRS outdrives vs the Bravo drive?

Clay Washington 08-31-2005 10:05 AM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 
Please ignore the "TSO" typo... :rolleyes:

BajaRunner 08-31-2005 10:08 AM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 
Trs = no parts = when they break your buying konrads

Bravo = suck = at least you can buy another bravo. :rolleyes:

Lofty 08-31-2005 01:55 PM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 

Originally Posted by BajaRunner
Trs = no parts = when they break your buying konrads

Bravo = suck = at least you can buy another bravo. :rolleyes:

TRS still have parts availible regardless of rumors to the contrary. When they do break big buy Konrads and never buy another drive again!

Bravo=suck(true!)=buy another Bravo=buy another Bravo=etc, etc, etc,

Your choice! I guess it makes sense to some people to keep banging there head against a wall :rolleyes:

MaxPerf 09-01-2005 09:04 AM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 
Konrads all the way!

29scarab 09-01-2005 09:19 AM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 
CLAYS


Loooooookin' at CIG's!!! :eek: :D

Clay Washington 09-01-2005 11:00 AM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 

Originally Posted by 29scarab
Clay's Loooooookin' at CIG's!!! :eek: :D

Looking, yes. Buying, no. I'm gonna stay "boatless" all winter and get serious next Spring.

In 4 weeks, it will be Harley ridin' weather in Texas! :cool:

littledcsrodshop 09-01-2005 11:19 AM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 
I love the TRS on my 24' Shifts smooth as silk with no clunk,
Never given a problem. ( hopefully that will continue! )

p4-33 09-01-2005 02:28 PM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 

Originally Posted by sutphen30
you just have to find someone that can set them up right,,w/ the proper fixes and then learn the sticks,,knowing how to throttle is key,very key.

Or... buy Konrads, knowing that they're set up right, and hammer the sticks with no mercy.

Sticks are for saving motors and lives, not drives.

Cheers,
Brian

birdog 09-01-2005 02:42 PM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 
Speedmasters !

jpclear 09-01-2005 07:13 PM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 
WHAT A STUPID SET OF CHOICES FOR THIS POLL!! TRS and Bravo are both great units in their own nitches. And the TRS technoledgy was lots earlier than Merc's Bravo development. (read this as: Jim Winn's patents on the Volvo drive had not run out at that time, cause Volvo was building "Bravos" back in the 60's) I personally think that a soft shift tranny INSIDE the boat beats a clunker/shifter hanging outside anyday. --- Jer

p4-33 09-02-2005 08:19 AM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 

Originally Posted by sutphen30
you must be right,,your a racer/expert. :rolleyes:i do believe the sutphen boxer(p4) ran stock bravos w/ a blower motor,,won quite a few championships.i'll stick w/ my friends who set the bravos up right,,,just a little cheaper and lighter than the konrads.

Racer, yes... expert, that's a bit extreme. From my personal experiences with Konrad stern drives, I have found that in an 8000lb boat with 600hp per side, these drives cannot be broken no matter how much abuse I give them. In racing situations, lifting off the throttles is often not an option, even if I probably should have. With 2 seasons of racing and poker running, the only thing I've had to change on my drives is oil.

I'll agree with the "lighter" statement with Bravos. By about 125lbs per side when you factor in the weight of the tranny. 250lbs or so is nominal in overall weight.

I'd argue the "cheaper" part. How many people out there have 2 drives on their boat, plus another one (or two) that they keep in the truck "just in case"? I see quite a bit of that, both on the race and poker run circuits. How many $2500 gearset rebuilds does it take before you offset the extra cost of buying a stronger drive setup in the first place? One? Two? Not many more, for sure.

How many of you out there have broken 2 Bravos?

How many of you out there have broken a Konrad?

The math doesn't add up that Bravos are cheaper.

Cheers,
Brian

p4-33 09-02-2005 12:59 PM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 

Originally Posted by sutphen30
i don't buy this weight thing,,they weigh more than a trs set up,,what happens to peoples cg,,more weight out back,,means higher bow coming off a wave

Actually, CG improves when a transmission is involved. Your motors are the heaviest pieces of hardware in the boat and are what, 1000lbs each? Move them forward a foot, and see what that does to your CG. This change in CG more than offsets a couple of hundred extra pounds of weight hanging off the back. Higher bow coming off a wave? I don't think you've seen the Konrad Fountain of Youth in action in the rough stuff. :cool:

As far as championships go... we'll have to wait and see what happens in Key West :D

Cheers,
Brian

p4-33 09-02-2005 02:48 PM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 
There's multiple ways to skin a cat... some work better than others.

I have to make assumptions on why Clay started this post. I'm guessing he's looking at boats and wanted opinions on TRS boats vs. bravo boats.

That said, we're talking about boats that already have TRS's installed, with a tranny inside the boat, motors already forward. These boats already have an improved CG with the engine positioning.

The real question is: do you want to shift in the drive, or in a tranny? Some bravo boats are indeed tight for space, so if you're looking to convert these boats to add a tranny your only choice is to put it in an extension box. The IMCO 4x4 is a good example, the Konrad Bravo conversion is another. Yes, both of these options will move the CG backwards, given the motors stay in the same spot.

On bravo boats where there is ample room in the engine compartment to move the motors forward to accomodate a tranny, there are tons of gains. The tranny itself is a big one - no cone clutches to worry about any more. Add a Konrad, 4x4 (empty or no box), or Speedmaster on the back and your drivetrain strength increases dramatically. CG also improves by moving it forward, improving your "flight pattern".

Biggest gain, no more broken Bravos.

Look us up in Key West. The first beer's on me :drink:

Cheers,
Brian

Panther 09-04-2005 08:33 AM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 

Originally Posted by sutphen30
still can't argue against stock bravos/blower 509/ and championships.drive like an idiot and anthing can be broken.as for konrads,,they may not break,,but to reclaim the speed of a bravo,you need more hp,,your motor will,,if not,,will need more frequent rebuilds.plus i don't buy this weight thing,,they weigh more than a trs set up,,what happens to peoples cg,,more weight out back,,means higher bow coming off a wave,,good luck all w/ the konrads,,i'll keep my package,,and i don't have spare bravos. :D

sutphen30,

Who do you have set up your bravos?

Just blew my second IMCO Extreme SC of the year.... They're supposed to handle up to 800 hp in a boat that is my size and weight,,, I only have 720.

also, the boat left the water maybe 5-10 times this year and I baby the hell out of the boat. Easy up out of the hole, never mash the throttles forward, 3400 cruise...

I've only logged on about 30 hours as well,,, the IMCO's were brand new when I bought the boat. :eek:

At $6000 new IMCO Extreme SC uppers, it just doesn't make economical sense. I've just about had enought of this! :(

Panther 09-05-2005 04:51 PM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 

Originally Posted by sutphen30
my friend who owns a hi po machine shop in norwood,has been setting up race car rear ends for 30yrs,i sent you a pm.anyone else interested,,send me pm,,i'll get you in touch w/ him and put a good word in for you.
i'll be w/ him at the shop monday,,putting some 540's in a friends 33' sutphen. :D

Thanks! Once I get it apart and see what's broken I may give a call.

Hopefully, it's not broken beyond repair like the last one when it made more sense just buying a new upper. :(

JohnJan 09-16-2005 03:15 PM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 
Clay, I'll take you for a ride in my 28SS with TRS's and MercII transmissions. Smoothest shifting boat I've ever owned.

Also, with regards to longevity, I've never had to "throttle" my boat in the water Lake T dishes out. Even my T'bred which was very, ummm, "lively" above 75mph, I would rarely lift. Anyone that breaks a drive on Lake T from being too hard on the sticks needs some lessons.

I thought about upgrading my TRS's to Bravo's when I bought my Cig but it just doesn't make sense to spend the money when the boat runs so well as it is. Simple maintenance and I could see them lasting pretty much forever.

Harley weather? What's up wit' 'dat? Harley's won't run in the summer? :D

BajaRunner 09-16-2005 03:19 PM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 
JohnJan,

I think I saw you out running a week or two ago in that cig. was it you?

Jason

JohnJan 09-18-2005 07:26 PM

Re: TRS vs Bravo
 
I wish. Last time I was out was July 4th weekend. My boss has had an anchor up my ass for months.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.