Lightning vs. CMI question?
 

CMI has introduced their new sport tube headers for the 496's at $3600 a set. They claim a 60 hp increase. I see that Lightning also has a tube header system for the 496's starting at $1799 a set for the black finish. Does anybody know how much hp can be gained with the Lightnings? If it's anywhere near what the cmi's claim, then I would steer towards the Lightnings due to the huge price difference. Can anyone shed some light on this?

Re: Lightning vs. CMI question?
 

what are the id's and tube lengths of one vs the other?

Re: Lightning vs. CMI question?
 

I'm not certain.

Re: Lightning vs. CMI question?
 

From the Lightning Web Site:

Our Standard Magnum fresh water header starts with mandrel bent 2" OD,1 7/8" ID 316 L stainless steel interior tubes. The exterior tubes are mandrel bent heavy wall 2 1/2" OD steel.



CMI are Stainless steel. Inside and out. They are offerd as a complete kit with tail pipes, stainless steel distribution tube upgrade, and ALL relocation brackets and hardware.

Quality doesn't come without a cost and CMI chooses not to offer headers made of mild steel. :)

Re: Lightning vs. CMI question?
 

Yes, CMI is top notch "you get what you pay for". I was just curious about the hp gains with the Lightnings vs. the cmi's? I'm not necessarily going for the looks rather the gains and you're paying big for the looks of the cmi's not to mention substantial gains.

Re: Lightning vs. CMI question?
 

Lightning also makes fully stainless headers...for a slightly higher price!!! I had a set on my bullet, they worked very well for me. 5" collectors and had a great sound!!

Re: Lightning vs. CMI question?
 

I would like to start off by saying that I have never used a CMI system but.....I have used Lightnings. I believe the Lightnings to be the best bang for the buck. The only draw back in my opinion would be that If you were using them in salt water you could have a corrosion problem before you might with the CMI's. I had a set for 5yrs and had no problems or complaints with them at all. I drained them after every weekend and now a friend has them. Upon removal I inspected them and pressure tested them and they were fine. I am now on my second set. I have the Lightning dry pipes now due to cam selection upon a rebuild.

As I'm sure you are aware, the Lightnings have stainless steel primaries and steel outers. From what I understand for the last few years the steel inners are etched and coated (possibly powdercoated) to resist corrosion. The all stainless Lightnings, CMI's and others are pricey but they are beautiful, strong works of art also.

As ratman said, I would study close the tube diameter and tube length.

Re: Lightning vs. CMI question?
 

A little OT but did CMI ever make a manifold type exhaust????.......Im speaking to a guy in Ohio that says he has two sets of small block CMI manifolds.......I said......."are you sure they're not EMI???"......he says No, CMI......

Re: Lightning vs. CMI question?
 

Never been in salt water and most likely never will. Still curious about hp gains with the Lightnings and ease of installation? Anybody?

Re: Lightning vs. CMI question?
 

I would suggest you call Jan at Lightning Ph (951) 678-5631. He's always happy to talk to folks and will tell you what he knows. He's a good ol' boy so you won't get any marketing BS from him. You might want to call Joey Griffith 252.946.1883. He's done some dyno work with Lightnings :D