![]() |
compairing out drives
How does a #5 compare to a B-max or Imco extreme.
I've heard good thinks about the Konrad and of course the #6 I just dont know anything about the #5 Parts availablity and strength. |
Re: compairing out drives
Don't know much about the bravo upgrades of B-max and Imco, but I can tell you from experience on the race course that the #5s can take EXTREME abuse. Albert and I run the Cig HARD with big power and they have held up. It is my understanding that you can still buy a #5 from Mercury, and parts availability are no problem. I just had both drives completely re-built in preparation for the new racing season. No problems getting new parts.
P.S., when are you coming down to ride the Pantera :D |
Re: compairing out drives
Thanks for the info. I'm at a cross roads right now. I have my engine torn down and want more pwr. I have a fresh bearings and gears xz. I feel like I should sell the bravo assmy. and sell my engine parts . I would then be able to set up a killer out drive and then throw an engine in it next yr. (2008). A long time to wait :(
Or I could just rebuild what I have, shut my mouth, stop whining, and be happy. I'm sure the ride with Albert might help me decide :D in Feb I think(boat show) |
Re: compairing out drives
3 Attachment(s)
Had #5's on my 04 Nortech, boat has appr. 175 hours. I sold it with 70 hours and never had a problem. Had 750hp per side, I thought they were reliable, but of course the #6 is better and is the crowd pleaser, but at twice the coin, I couldnt see it.
|
Re: compairing out drives
You know what you should do.
Up to 800HP - 1 Year warranty. No failures to date!! KONRAD ACE:evilb: I know a source. . . |
Re: compairing out drives
The Konrads are great. We run them on our own boat and have NO problems or failures. The units we havre put on customers boats are holding up the same.
|
Re: compairing out drives
How much power?
|
Re: compairing out drives
All things being considered you can't go wrong with a #5 or #6. In some cases the #5 is actually faster than the #6.
For me the Konrad would be the second choice. If price is a problem, sell your XR and get a BMax HT. It's the cheaper route of the three and should cost around $10K minus whatever you sell your XR for. Just my humble opinion. :) |
Re: compairing out drives
I have seen several nice used drives I'm concidering. Does the bmax use a bravo gimble housung? What's it rated for?
I thought about selling my mtr after it was redone and my fresh drive assmy and getting a jam up out drive, but Iwould have to save for a year for a monster mtr. I just don't want to miss the boat that long. |
Re: compairing out drives
Originally Posted by tomcei
(Post 1976687)
I have seen several nice used drives I'm concidering. Does the bmax use a bravo gimble housung? What's it rated for?
I thought about selling my mtr after it was redone and my fresh drive assmy and getting a jam up out drive, but Iwould have to save for a year for a monster mtr. I just don't want to miss the boat that long. |
Re: compairing out drives
Originally Posted by Panther
(Post 1976214)
All things being considered you can't go wrong with a #5 or #6. In some cases the #5 is actually faster than the #6.
For me the Konrad would be the second choice. If price is a problem, sell your XR and get a BMax HT. It's the cheaper route of the three and should cost around $10K minus whatever you sell your XR for. Just my humble opinion. :) Also is it true that the #4,#5,#6 are considered surface drives? |
Re: compairing out drives
Originally Posted by tomcei
(Post 1976865)
I like the idea. What is the hp rating on a #5?
Also is it true that the #4,#5,#6 are considered surface drives? #4's are discontinued, the 3,4,5 were a measurement of the depth to the drive, 3 being the deepest and 5 being the highest. Back in the day some of the older triple engine raceboats had a #3 in the center engine and #5's on the outside engines. I think Kid Apache was set up this way??? They are all surface drives, hence the cleaver style surface props. :drink: Another thing I would consider is the cost of props for a #5 vs. a Konrad/BMax, it's a huge difference and they're a lot less available. |
Re: compairing out drives
I would say a Konrad would be like a #3 but with a slightly higher horsepower rating. I was told 750 on a #3 to have a reliable package. I'm running 800's with Konrads. No problems to date. Just working on props.
|
Re: compairing out drives
There is a very nice pair of slightly used Imco 4X4's donw in FL by Larry Goldman. Decent price too.
|
Re: compairing out drives
Originally Posted by Pantera28-650HP
(Post 1977340)
There is a very nice pair of slightly used Imco 4X4's donw in FL by Larry Goldman. Decent price too.
I'm ready for more pics kirk:cool: |
Re: compairing out drives
the length of the boat as awell as a weight is very important to your decission. sixes weigh more and affect the c.g more as well. 5's are readily available as mentioned above, and wil as astated survive severe punishment.
b max is not a choice from a strength perspective, being if you dont match their drive with their gimbal, you now created a second week lynk. as is any bravo style/ design drive system ,again no need to elaborate. |
Re: compairing out drives
Originally Posted by monstaaa
(Post 1977360)
the length of the boat as awell as a weight is very important to your decission. sixes weigh more and affect the c.g more as well. 5's are readily available as mentioned above, and wil as astated survive severe punishment.
b max is not a choice from a strength perspective, being if you dont match their drive with their gimbal, you now created a second week lynk. as is any bravo style/ design drive system ,again no need to elaborate. The Bmax ,Max, Imco[bravo style] bolt up just like a stock Bravo. I wouldnt think the differant kind[namebrand] of drive wouldnt put more stress on a gimble. Rob:drink: |
Re: compairing out drives
a stronger bravo style drive on bravo gimbal or an i.t.s gimbal is not good from a mate standpoint, nor for a person with a heavy throttle hand. especially adding say a b-max. your increasing the load of the mechanical leverage agianst the original design,by increasing the weight of the drive itself. thus increasing the failure rate in critical areas ,like the pivot pins, and the helmut. i have seen this many times , and more so in conjunction with the use of the b-max. all your doing is moving the weak link from one area to another.
as far as the merc gimbal beeing the week link, it would depend on the boat length and weight. again mechaincal levrage comes into play as well as the c.g. lastly and most importantly when a product is used in a fashion above and beyond its original design failure isnt possible it;s eminant. although gary and i have routinely pushed his gladiator over the 100 mark with out any failure in the engine, gimbal, or drive, i would say this attests to frquent checks of all moving parts, good design,and proper opperation in that relm. remember hevy hands yeild heavy hits especially when punching a WET PAPER BAG. |
Re: compairing out drives
p.s strip i love the rooster skit l.m.a.o
|
Re: compairing out drives
Originally Posted by monstaaa
(Post 1977360)
the length of the boat as awell as a weight is very important to your decission. sixes weigh more and affect the c.g more as well. 5's are readily available as mentioned above, and wil as astated survive severe punishment.
b max is not a choice from a strength perspective, being if you dont match their drive with their gimbal, you now created a second week lynk. as is any bravo style/ design drive system ,again no need to elaborate. Does anyone think this is to stern heavy with a #6 ? I wouldn't think it would be as bad as twins w/ bravo's on the c.g. I assume the #5 is a lighter assmy. I certinly don't want to change the handling too much. I does seem to be balanced very well. |
Re: compairing out drives
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by tomcei
(Post 1977480)
The boat in question is a 28 Pantera single engine.
Does anyone think this is to stern heavy with a #6 ? I wouldn't think it would be as bad as twins w/ bravo's on the c.g. I assume the #5 is a lighter assmy. I certinly don't want to change the handling too much. I does seem to be balanced very well. compared to the bravo boat of same brand the investment was well worth it, being it was infact vertually bullet proof. |
Re: compairing out drives
Originally Posted by monstaaa
(Post 1977412)
p.s strip i love the rooster skit l.m.a.o
Punching a WET PAPER BAG:drink: |
Re: compairing out drives
Originally Posted by Strip Poker 388
(Post 1977529)
I like the quote
Punching a WET PAPER BAG:drink: well just call me.:D |
Re: compairing out drives
Any ball park on the weight dif between the #5 & #6 ?
|
Re: compairing out drives
Originally Posted by tomcei
(Post 1977480)
The boat in question is a 28 Pantera single engine.
Does anyone think this is to stern heavy with a #6 ? I wouldn't think it would be as bad as twins w/ bravo's on the c.g. I assume the #5 is a lighter assmy. I certinly don't want to change the handling too much. I does seem to be balanced very well. No, they put twins in them:rolleyes: You'll be fine, by the way i think the #5 is rated for 800hp. Cougarman |
Re: compairing out drives
p.s. as for it being a twin boat, those boats probably dont run as well as a single high h.p single in rough water due to all that extra weight in the stern.
and i believe the weight differernce is a bout 75 lbs from 5 to 6. drive and transom assembly. including the steering on the 5. |
Re: compairing out drives
Originally Posted by monstaaa
(Post 1977407)
a stronger bravo style drive on bravo gimbal or an i.t.s gimbal is not good from a mate standpoint, nor for a person with a heavy throttle hand. especially adding say a b-max. your increasing the load of the mechanical leverage agianst the original design,by increasing the weight of the drive itself. thus increasing the failure rate in critical areas ,like the pivot pins, and the helmut. i have seen this many times , and more so in conjunction with the use of the b-max. all your doing is moving the weak link from one area to another.
as far as the merc gimbal beeing the week link, it would depend on the boat length and weight. again mechaincal levrage comes into play as well as the c.g. lastly and most importantly when a product is used in a fashion above and beyond its original design failure isnt possible it;s eminant. although gary and i have routinely pushed his gladiator over the 100 mark with out any failure in the engine, gimbal, or drive, i would say this attests to frquent checks of all moving parts, good design,and proper opperation in that relm. remember hevy hands yeild heavy hits especially when punching a WET PAPER BAG. I agree with you 100%. In the end consider the pro's and con's for each setup and pick what fits into your budget, there will always be give/take. :drink: |
Re: compairing out drives
I also have and HD Gimbal/transom assembly for sale in the swap section if it ever comes back!!
The unit has 65 hours fresh water only. Kirk Pictures were posted in the Pantera section. Konrad pictures in a couple weeks I hope. It's in production. |
Re: compairing out drives
We put 950 through a #3 in on the boat in the pic under my name. # seasons and we havent had a single problem. The 3a is stronger and better. We have a 2 speed trans which is good for taking the load off during take off and a soft touch limiter which mist help but we give it a hard time and it lives. We will change to a #5 if it breaks. Wouldnt consider any bravo type unit without some big convincing it wouldnt break. Much lighter though and much less HP to turn than a SSM. Jas
|
Re: compairing out drives
Should the transom of a bravo powered boat be beefed up if switching to 5 or a 6? As you said, just moving the weak link to a new location.
|
Re: compairing out drives
I have V's with some "net forged gears". They claimed they were stronger than the original? Anyway, 900+ going into them and absolutely no problems or metal in oil after 100+ hours. Any the SSM's allow you to run a substantially larger wheel at of course, a substantially larger price :)
|
Re: compairing out drives
Originally Posted by Donzi502
(Post 1978680)
We put 950 through a #3 in on the boat in the pic under my name. # seasons and we havent had a single problem. The 3a is stronger and better. We have a 2 speed trans which is good for taking the load off during take off and a soft touch limiter which mist help but we give it a hard time and it lives. We will change to a #5 if it breaks. Wouldnt consider any bravo type unit without some big convincing it wouldnt break. Much lighter though and much less HP to turn than a SSM. Jas
|
Re: compairing out drives
i have a pair of bmaxes for 12.000. will take some xrs on trade
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.