![]() |
GM 6.0L small block marine engine
Why is Merc not using this engine?
Big block power, small block size and weight... http://www.gm.com/explore/technology...LY6_Marine.pdf |
Interesting article.
The big questions is how much $$$$ |
Originally Posted by 1BIGJIM
(Post 2294815)
Interesting article.
The big questions is how much $$$$ http://www.1800runsnew.com/NLM/crusa...gines-NLM.html |
Pat, I've been asking this question for over a year...since I found OSO. My only guess is a resistance/inability to invest in new tooling for things like exhaust (different flange/port) and closed-cooling (warranty issues...salt+aluminum).
Crusader, Indmar, Marine Power...they all offer a version of this motor. Here's a brainfart...perhaps Merc will surprise the boating community and offer this engine, with full O2 sensor and catalytic converter technology to comply with the eco-nazis... I'd love to see a package with displacement on demand for idle zones and the new variable valve/cam timing system. |
Off the top of my head...
1. Bigger equals stronger. I have commercial trucks. My Cats put out equivalent horsepower to my Ford 6.0's and Duramaxes. They weigh more that twice but they last 3 or 4 times as long. No substitute for brute force. 2. The current platform is doing quite well- why change? The weight gain relative to the overall boat weight is fairly insignificant. It could easily be equalled by the big-block with alloy blocks, without changing any tooling. 3. More parts = more to go wrong. Technology is wonderful until it doesn't work. All that variable valve timing stuff does wonderful things but it's far from foolproof. 4. That's one fugly motor. |
Originally Posted by Chris Sunkin
(Post 2294958)
That's one fugly motor.
http://www.pcmengines.com/NewFiles/Z...ec%20Sheet.PDF I'm not so much suggesting to replace the big block but to replace that 320HP/6.2L. The Merc 6.2L does not produce that much more than the 350MagMPI but does cost a lot more. I think this would be a great engine for 27' to 32' twin engine performance boats. Maybe Merc Racing should add it to their line? |
Yeah, it's not like the 496 is a beauty queen.
http://www.mercurymarine.com/engines...ves/mpi496.php The manifold cover helps |
Re-analyze based on it being a small-block replacement, not a big block. And that's part of the problem from a perception point of view. The peak numbers make it comparable to a big block, but the area under the curve doesn't support that comparison. But the numbers also put a traditional small block to shame. It ends up not fitting in Merc's lineup.
The VVT is my wish; the marine 6.0 doesn't have any of that stuff. I'm curious how large a percentage of GM's "old" small block business comes from Merc and Volvo. Is there that large a demand on the industrial side, outside of marine, that will continue to support those castings? How much longer before GM sells that business line? Perhaps Brunswick will enter the foundry business. They might get that cheaper than the development R&D for new engines. |
Brunswick is in the foundry business, they are one of the largest "lost foam" casters around.
|
Mercury built the Corvette ZR-1 for Chevrolet, that would be a nice boat engine at 427 cu in.
|
Originally Posted by handfulz28
(Post 2295092)
The VVT is my wish; the marine 6.0 doesn't have any of that stuff.
http://www.gm.com/explore/technology...LY6_Marine.pdf How about the Raylar stroker? http://www.raylarengine.com/550_engine.html It looks like a modified Vette engine. |
Originally Posted by Pat McPherson
(Post 2296166)
If VVT = variable valve timing, the GM 6.0L marine does have it.
How about the Raylar stroker? http://www.raylarengine.com/550_engine.html It looks like a modified Vette engine. Raylar's piece will be unique. It's great that they're tackling it, but at an estimated price of $20k, it doesn't appeal to the mass market. |
Originally Posted by Pat McPherson
(Post 2295008)
Well this version is not so fugly...:D
http://www.pcmengines.com/NewFiles/Z...ec%20Sheet.PDF I'm not so much suggesting to replace the big block but to replace that 320HP/6.2L. The Merc 6.2L does not produce that much more than the 350MagMPI but does cost a lot more. I think this would be a great engine for 27' to 32' twin engine performance boats. Maybe Merc Racing should add it to their line? The real deal is the 6.2 repower package. comes with basically everything you need to repower, including the drive and related components. Bravo 1 package is about $12k, Bravo 3 package is about $12.5k |
Originally Posted by VetteLT193
(Post 2296337)
Last I checked the 350 Mag MPI was in the low $6,000 area ($6,200) rings a bell. The 6.2 is about a grand more than that and even though on the surface only looks like 20HP, it's a much beefier and more powerful engine.
The real deal is the 6.2 repower package. comes with basically everything you need to repower, including the drive and related components. Bravo 1 package is about $12k, Bravo 3 package is about $12.5k A new 320HP 6.2L Bravo I is like $20,000... the 350MagMPI Bravo I is 17K. http://www.mercruiserparts.com/mercr...ive_engine.asp |
My Ski Nautique has the 6.0 L P.C.M. Motor in it. They rate it at 375 hp. Great motor but seems to not really have much more low end torque than the 5.7. Runs smooth as a Swiss watch though. I believe there was an A.M.T. cat that had these motors and ran very well!
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.