![]() |
Are there any better brands out there than others when it comes to the phenolic ones? I havent looked yet but i'm sure there are a million to chose from.....
|
Originally Posted by ballon78
(Post 3051220)
Are there any better brands out there than others when it comes to the phenolic ones? I havent looked yet but i'm sure there are a million to chose from.....
|
Originally Posted by formula 382 sr-1
(Post 3051178)
We did two 515,s 9.1 comp dart heads merlin 4150 intake and the results with and with out a 1 inch HVH Supersucker was 2 hp at 5600 rpm. We did 4 pulls started without it put it on, took it off put it back on and got the same #'s 2 more hp with it on. That being said the Hp 500 arrester was a loss of 6 Hp to not having one at all. The K&N arester was only a loss of 1 hp.
Just my $0.02 *741 hp with Gafrig 5x10 flame arrestor. *746 hp without flame arrestor. *752 hp with "modified" Gafrig flame arrestor (pulled out 13' of internal mesh). *30 hp loss with k & N flame arrestor 6x12. NOTE: Not sure of the spacer HP gain however the 1" was the best. This makes your brain hurt a little. LOL... |
GRD, do you happen to have any knowledge as to why the K&N lost so much Hp?
|
Originally Posted by wjb21ndtown
(Post 3051312)
GRD, do you happen to have any knowledge as to why the K&N lost so much Hp?
I am going into this assuming/hoping, I will be close to 600 hp with a nice torque curve on my 496's. Regardless I plan to use three different flame arrestors. The builds consist of 496 CI, 9.8 to 1 comp., Dart Pro 1's, 310cc, 225/188 (very little chamber work), Dart intake, Comp custom grind 244-248 / 647-637 / 111 lobe sep. VARIOUS TEST: -gafrig 8x3 -gafrig 10x5 -gafrig 10x5 modified - 1" hvh super sucker - 2" hvh super sucker - without super sucker - Barry Grant 850 downleg - Holley hp 950 NOTE: Anyone interest in results and can lend me a 1" hvh super sucker for the test would be appreciated. John |
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 3051235)
The hvh that I used for a shop floor run was ice cold while the engine was running. That's really funny how everyone has so different results on the dyno with those things. I understand your use though.
|
Originally Posted by bajabob
(Post 3051350)
mine was cold to :drink:its aluminum. i put my hand on it when it was runnig it was like a ice cube .they do give you hp he did it with out and try 5differne ones ! fred told me he try all kinds of spacers till he gets the best hp and a/f . now i have k/n air cleaner . . we didnt use that when we dyno it . i will post who make the best air cleaner ???? thanks for info
|
getrdunn is close with the #'s he posted. I did 5 back to back pulls with Gaffrig 10X5 Dominator flame arrestor. The Gaffrig flame arrestor has 13 feet of fine mesh screen in it, the 1/2 means 6 1/2 feet removed. This test was to see if we were going to lose speed with the flame arrestor and as you can see even if we leave them as sent from Gaffrig on this build we would not lose any, the TQ #'s are to close to make a difference.
1st pull no flame arrestor 746 HP 709 TQ 2nd pull full flame arrestor 743 HP 709 TQ 3rd pull 1/2 flame arrestor 749 HP 711 TQ 4th pull no flame arrestor 746 HP 710 TQ 5th pull 1/2 flame arrestor 751 HP 710 TQ The K&N test was done on 516 CUI engines we did awhile back but may not of been a real fair test because they were done with a custom lower base that the customer had made but did use K&N 11 X 5 marine filter. The engines made 630 HP and with the K&N filter lost almost 30 HP in 2 consecutive pulls. These engines actually made best power with Barron stock style 6 1/2 X 2 arrestors. The 572's have custom Wilson single plane intakes and picked up 18 HP and 14 TQ with Wison 4 hole 1 inch spacer. |
This is really good info however I know it doesn't come without an expense. I think we owe a big THANKS to Brian for this.
John |
Originally Posted by brian41
(Post 3051455)
getrdunn is close with the #'s he posted. I did 5 back to back pulls with Gaffrig 10X5 Dominator flame arrestor. The Gaffrig flame arrestor has 13 feet of fine mesh screen in it, the 1/2 means 6 1/2 feet removed. This test was to see if we were going to lose speed with the flame arrestor and as you can see even if we leave them as sent from Gaffrig on this build we would not lose any, the TQ #'s are to close to make a difference.
1st pull no flame arrestor 746 HP 709 TQ 2nd pull full flame arrestor 743 HP 709 TQ 3rd pull 1/2 flame arrestor 749 HP 711 TQ 4th pull no flame arrestor 746 HP 710 TQ 5th pull 1/2 flame arrestor 751 HP 710 TQ The K&N test was done on 516 CUI engines we did awhile back but may not of been a real fair test because they were done with a custom lower base that the customer had made but did use K&N 11 X 5 marine filter. The engines made 630 HP and with the K&N filter lost almost 30 HP in 2 consecutive pulls. These engines actually made best power with Barron stock style 6 1/2 X 2 arrestors. The 572's have custom Wilson single plane intakes and picked up 18 HP and 14 TQ with Wison 4 hole 1 inch spacer. Great informative post! Let me pick your brain, I am running 502's with approx. 560hp. With Dart single planes and 850 holleys with Gaffrig arrestors. I am going to add a spacer this year was leaning towards the 1" HVH Siuper Sucker. What gains if any can I ballpark and would you suggest another spacer. Thanks I would love to hear your opinion....I love this site it is invaluable. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.