Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Q & A (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q-20/)
-   -   Which Carb spacer 502 carb? (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/224815-carb-spacer-502-carb.html)

ballon78 02-20-2010 05:57 PM

Are there any better brands out there than others when it comes to the phenolic ones? I havent looked yet but i'm sure there are a million to chose from.....

getrdunn 02-20-2010 06:28 PM


Originally Posted by ballon78 (Post 3051220)
Are there any better brands out there than others when it comes to the phenolic ones? I havent looked yet but i'm sure there are a million to chose from.....

The hvh that I used for a shop floor run was ice cold while the engine was running. That's really funny how everyone has so different results on the dyno with those things. I understand your use though.

getrdunn 02-20-2010 06:44 PM


Originally Posted by formula 382 sr-1 (Post 3051178)
We did two 515,s 9.1 comp dart heads merlin 4150 intake and the results with and with out a 1 inch HVH Supersucker was 2 hp at 5600 rpm. We did 4 pulls started without it put it on, took it off put it back on and got the same #'s 2 more hp with it on. That being said the Hp 500 arrester was a loss of 6 Hp to not having one at all. The K&N arester was only a loss of 1 hp.

Just my $0.02

This is also interesting. I was talking to Brian here on the board the other day. He has a shop over on the east side of the state and also has a dyno. It sounds like he does a lot of extensive testing for his inhouse projects. He did some test with flame arrestors also. I found his recent test extremely interesting. This is a true example of how every application can vary so much. It only makes sense. I hope he doesn't mind me sharing what he kindly educated me over the phone with. I beleive this test was with a modified 572. My numbers may not be exact however I recall as follows.

*741 hp with Gafrig 5x10 flame arrestor.

*746 hp without flame arrestor.

*752 hp with "modified" Gafrig flame arrestor (pulled out 13' of internal mesh).

*30 hp loss with k & N flame arrestor 6x12.

NOTE: Not sure of the spacer HP gain however the 1" was the best.

This makes your brain hurt a little. LOL...

wjb21ndtown 02-20-2010 08:15 PM

GRD, do you happen to have any knowledge as to why the K&N lost so much Hp?

getrdunn 02-20-2010 08:43 PM


Originally Posted by wjb21ndtown (Post 3051312)
GRD, do you happen to have any knowledge as to why the K&N lost so much Hp?

Not at all. I even questioned his comment regarding such. It seems rediculous doesn't it. It has to be the design or the element material used. I take you find this interesting also. To be honest all the years of boating and building boat engines I really never gave the flame arrestors much of a thought and always used a minimum of 8x3 gafrig. Then again most of the engines I have built were all under 675 HP. My dyno session in a couple of weeks I will be doing some various testing myself and will post the numbers.

I am going into this assuming/hoping, I will be close to 600 hp with a nice torque curve on my 496's. Regardless I plan to use three different flame arrestors. The builds consist of 496 CI, 9.8 to 1 comp., Dart Pro 1's, 310cc, 225/188 (very little chamber work), Dart intake, Comp custom grind 244-248 / 647-637 / 111 lobe sep.

VARIOUS TEST:

-gafrig 8x3
-gafrig 10x5
-gafrig 10x5 modified

- 1" hvh super sucker
- 2" hvh super sucker
- without super sucker

- Barry Grant 850 downleg
- Holley hp 950

NOTE: Anyone interest in results and can lend me a 1" hvh super sucker for the test would be appreciated.

John

bajabob 02-20-2010 09:11 PM


Originally Posted by getrdunn (Post 3051235)
The hvh that I used for a shop floor run was ice cold while the engine was running. That's really funny how everyone has so different results on the dyno with those things. I understand your use though.

mine was cold to :drink:its aluminum. i put my hand on it when it was runnig it was like a ice cube .they do give you hp he did it with out and try 5differne ones ! fred told me he try all kinds of spacers till he gets the best hp and a/f . now i have k/n air cleaner . . we didnt use that when we dyno it . i will post who make the best air cleaner ???? thanks for info

getrdunn 02-20-2010 09:23 PM


Originally Posted by bajabob (Post 3051350)
mine was cold to :drink:its aluminum. i put my hand on it when it was runnig it was like a ice cube .they do give you hp he did it with out and try 5differne ones ! fred told me he try all kinds of spacers till he gets the best hp and a/f . now i have k/n air cleaner . . we didnt use that when we dyno it . i will post who make the best air cleaner ???? thanks for info

That will be a good thread and informative for a bunch of us. Probably will have a lot to do with the amout of HP. What do you have for power?

brian41 02-21-2010 08:01 AM

getrdunn is close with the #'s he posted. I did 5 back to back pulls with Gaffrig 10X5 Dominator flame arrestor. The Gaffrig flame arrestor has 13 feet of fine mesh screen in it, the 1/2 means 6 1/2 feet removed. This test was to see if we were going to lose speed with the flame arrestor and as you can see even if we leave them as sent from Gaffrig on this build we would not lose any, the TQ #'s are to close to make a difference.

1st pull no flame arrestor 746 HP 709 TQ
2nd pull full flame arrestor 743 HP 709 TQ
3rd pull 1/2 flame arrestor 749 HP 711 TQ
4th pull no flame arrestor 746 HP 710 TQ
5th pull 1/2 flame arrestor 751 HP 710 TQ

The K&N test was done on 516 CUI engines we did awhile back but may not of been a real fair test because they were done with a custom lower base that the customer had made but did use K&N 11 X 5 marine filter. The engines made 630 HP and with the K&N filter lost almost 30 HP in 2 consecutive pulls. These engines actually made best power with Barron stock style 6 1/2 X 2 arrestors.

The 572's have custom Wilson single plane intakes and picked up 18 HP and 14 TQ with Wison 4 hole 1 inch spacer.

getrdunn 02-21-2010 12:44 PM

This is really good info however I know it doesn't come without an expense. I think we owe a big THANKS to Brian for this.

John

4195 02-21-2010 01:35 PM


Originally Posted by brian41 (Post 3051455)
getrdunn is close with the #'s he posted. I did 5 back to back pulls with Gaffrig 10X5 Dominator flame arrestor. The Gaffrig flame arrestor has 13 feet of fine mesh screen in it, the 1/2 means 6 1/2 feet removed. This test was to see if we were going to lose speed with the flame arrestor and as you can see even if we leave them as sent from Gaffrig on this build we would not lose any, the TQ #'s are to close to make a difference.

1st pull no flame arrestor 746 HP 709 TQ
2nd pull full flame arrestor 743 HP 709 TQ
3rd pull 1/2 flame arrestor 749 HP 711 TQ
4th pull no flame arrestor 746 HP 710 TQ
5th pull 1/2 flame arrestor 751 HP 710 TQ

The K&N test was done on 516 CUI engines we did awhile back but may not of been a real fair test because they were done with a custom lower base that the customer had made but did use K&N 11 X 5 marine filter. The engines made 630 HP and with the K&N filter lost almost 30 HP in 2 consecutive pulls. These engines actually made best power with Barron stock style 6 1/2 X 2 arrestors.

The 572's have custom Wilson single plane intakes and picked up 18 HP and 14 TQ with Wison 4 hole 1 inch spacer.

Brian,
Great informative post! Let me pick your brain, I am running 502's with approx. 560hp. With Dart single planes and 850 holleys with Gaffrig arrestors. I am going to add a spacer this year was leaning towards the 1" HVH Siuper Sucker. What gains if any can I ballpark and would you suggest another spacer. Thanks I would love to hear your opinion....I love this site it is invaluable.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.