![]() |
Couple questions since i am in the same situation.
#1- what order would you start to do the mods (cam and pcm, then exhaust or the other way around) #2- would you recommend the raylar 103 cam or the stock 496HO cam ? Any gains in the stock heads to be had? slight port and polish or is it a total waste of time? I have a Baja Outlaw 25 with 496 mag and was planning on doing cam and pcm, then headers, then prop work ( I am leaving prop til last due to the variations of altitude that i run on for lakes) Oh and doing work to the bottom side of the boat but thats a whole other post.... Sheldon |
i run a 496 HO
took the K&N off and used a larger flame arester installed CMI ETop Headers and put a 26 labbed 4Blade prop went from an average speed of 62 mph to an average of 68 mph all gps speeds on my laveycraft also boosted the fuel pressure 5 PSI to maintain air fuel ratio with the extra scavenging of the headers and im not doing anymore to this motor...... cheaper to buy a whole new hull with the power i want than it is to modify |
Originally Posted by Centsless
(Post 3293044)
i run a 496 HO
took the K&N off and used a larger flame arester installed CMI ETop Headers and put a 26 labbed 4Blade prop went from an average speed of 62 mph to an average of 68 mph all gps speeds on my laveycraft also boosted the fuel pressure 5 PSI to maintain air fuel ratio with the extra scavenging of the headers and im not doing anymore to this motor...... cheaper to buy a whole new hull with the power i want than it is to modify |
Originally Posted by Centsless
(Post 3293044)
i run a 496 HO
took the K&N off and used a larger flame arester installed CMI ETop Headers and put a 26 labbed 4Blade prop went from an average speed of 62 mph to an average of 68 mph all gps speeds on my laveycraft also boosted the fuel pressure 5 PSI to maintain air fuel ratio with the extra scavenging of the headers and im not doing anymore to this motor...... cheaper to buy a whole new hull with the power i want than it is to modify |
Originally Posted by Rage
(Post 3293182)
Curious, what was the first prop and the rpm you ran for the 62 mph and what is the rpm you run at now for the 68 mph?
|
Originally Posted by Centsless
(Post 3293044)
i run a 496 HO
took the K&N off and used a larger flame arester installed CMI ETop Headers and put a 26 labbed 4Blade prop went from an average speed of 62 mph to an average of 68 mph all gps speeds on my laveycraft also boosted the fuel pressure 5 PSI to maintain air fuel ratio with the extra scavenging of the headers and im not doing anymore to this motor...... cheaper to buy a whole new hull with the power i want than it is to modify 5PSI? Just for headers? That would drown a 496, does you transom look like a coal mine? |
Originally Posted by Rage
(Post 3293182)
Curious, what was the first prop and the rpm you ran for the 62 mph and what is the rpm you run at now for the 68 mph?
|
Originally Posted by thirdchildhood
(Post 3293194)
Yeah, one thing at a time. The flame arrester did nothing unless someone had put a ridiculously small one on there and......6 mph from exhaust upgrade? It's not that easy...............
|
Originally Posted by Keith Atlanta
(Post 3293263)
The K&N just plain sucks - my boat went 1-2 MPH slower.
5PSI? Just for headers? That would drown a 496, does you transom look like a coal mine? |
now having said all this......... the headers most likely only gave me 20 to 30 more hp perhaps a bit more
this allowed me to spin a larger prop but it need to be labbed..... my mechanic and i did touch 70 once with a labbed 3 blade but the overall handling characteristics were horrible back to the 4 blade.....and the cost averaged out to about $1000 per mph for the purchase and work done |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.