![]() |
lightning headers
lookin at a set of lightnings. I have the gils on hp500 with silent choice. Lightnings are the standard header and removing silent choice. I dont believe reversion will be a issue with this set up.
However i plan on putting on a set of afr 305 heads and i have a custom ground cam by rmbuilder that i got of a oso'er that had same set up. cam is in225/ex231 582/597 lift on 112. (numbers are off top of my head, may not be exact but are close). Would reversion be an issue? would the reduced water header be a better choice |
I have Lightning headers on my 522, my cam is 242/252 @ .050" and .623/.611 with a 112 LSA and no problems. The Lightning's are taller than stock which helps keep water out of the cylinders.
|
You will be fine! I have Eickert headers and am running an RM Builder cam that is 234/241 dur .63/.615 lift with 112 lobe sep. I also ran this cam with standard length Stainless Marine Manifolds.
|
lightning makes a header for silent choice if you want to keep it...
|
Originally Posted by floyd7811
(Post 3387580)
lookin at a set of lightnings. I have the gils on hp500 with silent choice. Lightnings are the standard header and removing silent choice. I dont believe reversion will be a issue with this set up.
However i plan on putting on a set of afr 305 heads and i have a custom ground cam by rmbuilder that i got of a oso'er that had same set up. cam is in225/ex231 582/597 lift on 112. (numbers are off top of my head, may notene exact but are close). Would reversion be an issue? would the reduced water header be a better choice |
ohio river and ky lake, and loto when i can. NO SALT
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.