Jetting advice needed for 489 with Holley 800
#11
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Well, I opened up the carb a few minutes ago, and it has the staggered jetting - primary: port - 81, stbd - 75, secondary: port - 89, stbd - 93; 6.5 PV. I think I recall reading that Merc did this to try to even out fuel distribution with the Dart intakes.
So I guess I will have to buy some new jets to get it squared up, since I doubt if the dual plane intake will take very well to this setup.
So I guess I will have to buy some new jets to get it squared up, since I doubt if the dual plane intake will take very well to this setup.
Well, I opened up the carb a few minutes ago, and it has the staggered jetting - primary: port - 81, stbd - 75, secondary: port - 89, stbd - 93; 6.5 PV. I think I recall reading that Merc did this to try to even out fuel distribution with the Dart intakes.
So I guess I will have to buy some new jets to get it squared up, since I doubt if the dual plane intake will take very well to this setup.
So I guess I will have to buy some new jets to get it squared up, since I doubt if the dual plane intake will take very well to this setup.
I ran very simular set up. Almost identacle years ago and ended up with simular jetting boating out of MI. I had to dig a little however found the old dyno sheets. Bone stock 800 cfm 9022 with the choke horns and chokes. The prim and sec in seq as you stated 79,74 & 86,89. Worked well and ran great. Plug readings were always great. The staggered jetting you have is just a tad more than stock. I recall spending some time to even out the egt's the best I could. As you know and as mentioned every application will vary. The stock jetting was just a little much for my app. When I got the carbs they were very fresh take offs but I don't remember the jetting being exactly as stated although it may have been. Merc may have changed up the jetting a little back then also.
Just noticed my comp was 9.6/1 and had lightenings for exhaust. Your probably boderline or could go either way with intake. What max rpm you plan on running? I was 5,600 - 5,700. On the water I actually liked the single plane the best. I definately pulled harder mid range.
Last edited by getrdunn; 05-29-2011 at 11:42 PM.
#12
Registered
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: NY
Either way, you'd probably be changing jets anyway. Now you've got the right carb and some good info on a starting point.
#13
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
FWIW, I also have an 850 Demon that is brand new. I thought about running it as well. It's not a marine carb, however.
#14
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
I ran very simular set up. Almost identacle years ago and ended up with simular jetting boating out of MI. I had to dig a little however found the old dyno sheets. Bone stock 800 cfm 9022 with the choke horns and chokes. The prim and sec in seq as you stated 79,74 & 86,89. Worked well and ran great. Plug readings were always great. The staggered jetting you have is just a tad more than stock. I recall spending some time to even out the egt's the best I could. As you know and as mentioned every application will vary. The stock jetting was just a little much for my app. When I got the carbs they were very fresh take offs but I don't remember the jetting being exactly as stated although it may have been. Merc may have changed up the jetting a little back then also.
Just noticed my comp was 9.6/1 and had lightenings for exhaust. Your probably boderline or could go either way with intake. What max rpm you plan on running? I was 5,600 - 5,700. On the water I actually liked the single plane the best. I definately pulled harder mid range.
Just noticed my comp was 9.6/1 and had lightenings for exhaust. Your probably boderline or could go either way with intake. What max rpm you plan on running? I was 5,600 - 5,700. On the water I actually liked the single plane the best. I definately pulled harder mid range.
#15
#16
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
Just looking through the stuff I have laying around in the shop, I have an old 850 Holley with 80's on all four corners, and my Demon has 88's on the primary side. Is 80 primary and 88 secondary a close enough starting point?
#17
Yeah, that should be fine. Pull some spark plugs after running the boat for a minute at the rpm just before the secondaries open and check to see how the plugs look. Probably 3800-4000rpms.
#18
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
getrdunn, were you running a 496 with dual plane intake, or single plane? Looks like you were set up a little leaner than my carb is out of the box - which would follow logic as the HP500 has a little bit more cam than I have. I have a set of Lightnings that I considered running, but with my exhaust port mismatch (see other thread), I don't think I could run them without some custom collectors. I am not planning to spin this one up past 5200 - 5400. It has forged Mahle flat top pistons and good I-beam rods, but it has the Eagle cast steel crank, so I am going to err on the side of caution. I spend most of my time cruising between 3000 - 4000 RPM anyway, with the very occasional full throttle blast.




