![]() |
Any 502 MPI Experts?
I have a pair of 1997 Merc 502 MPI engine with 500 efi cams and stainless marine exhaust. The MEFI 1 PCMs were refalshed for this configuration. Long story short, I ended up running the engines at 36 psi fuel pressure and disconnected the knock sensors and did bad things to the engines. The damage is identical on both engines: The spark plug melted on the # 3 cylinder with no piston damage and the piston melted on the # 6 cylinder with no spark plug damage. All four of these are the same cylinder location in the head castings. Is there a cooling problem the the head in around the second cylinder from the left end of the head when looking from the exhaust port side? Is there a flow problem in the intake manifold / head which could cause these cylinders to be leaner than the others? Could there be a mismatch between the 500 efi cams and the 415 MPI intakes? Could the PCM program be causing a unique fuel flow issue on these cylinders? Could COMETIC head gaskets cause a cooling flow issue? Are a melted piston and a melted center electrode on a spark plug caused by the same condition or is one detonation and one pre ignition? Thanks for any insight you can provide.
|
Could the PCM program be causing a unique fuel flow issue on these cylinders?
No, the mefi is batch fire and fires 1/2 the motor every rev, those cylinders simply were the leaneest out of all of them and melted down first. Who did your reflash? The only safe way to start switching cams and changing fuel pressure (although yours was higher than stock) is to ideally dyno motor while watching temps/02 sensor and at a minimum check motor with 02 sensor in the boat and re-tune fuel ables or at least throw extra fuel at it with higher rail pressure (a band aid), Smitty |
Originally Posted by articfriends
(Post 3483625)
Could the PCM program be causing a unique fuel flow issue on these cylinders?
No, the mefi is batch fire and fires 1/2 the motor every rev, those cylinders simply were the leaneest out of all of them and melted down first. Who did your reflash? The only safe way to start switching cams and changing fuel pressure (although yours was higher than stock) is to ideally dyno motor while watching temps/02 sensor and at a minimum check motor with 02 sensor in the boat and re-tune fuel ables or at least throw extra fuel at it with higher rail pressure (a band aid), Smitty Thanks. |
Originally Posted by Inspector
(Post 3483646)
The PCMs were flashed by Tyler Crockett. I thought the factory fuel pressure was @ 40 psi with no vacuum to the regulator? If the system batch fires are cyliners 3 and 6 at the beginning or end of the firing sequence of each batch? Still trying to understand why the exact same failure mode on the same cylinders in two different engines. Also, using an O2 sensor would be reading a mixture of all exhaust from one bank, would it catch one unique cylinder?
Thanks. As far as I remember the batch fire it fires 4 cylinders 1,2,5,6 then another revolution later 3,4,7,8, it just ends up spraying fuel crudely into ports without alot of importance to piston position/timing, the fact that you melted the same hole in both motors tells me that those holes must typically run lean ( someone who sees alot of damaged motors like Eddie Young might chime in if 3/6burn up first). As far as a 02 sensor not seeing a individual cylinder, only seeing that bank, as long as you don't have a severly lean cylinder from a strange problem you are going to tune to a safe afr , not to edge of burn down anyways, individual egts on dyno would tell you more but alot of tunes have been done in boats using 02 readings and it usually works, Smitty |
I might have the batch fire order wrong but thats how I remember the injector plugs going acrossed the intak but here is a previous thread:
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...efi4b-ecu.html |
Batch "A"1467, Batch "B"2358
Originally Posted by articfriends
(Post 3483703)
I might have the batch fire order wrong but thats how I remember the injector plugs going acrossed the intak but here is a previous thread:
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...efi4b-ecu.html |
Originally Posted by tunertech
(Post 3483831)
Batch "A"1467, Batch "B"2358
|
Why where the knock sensors disconnected ?
|
Just want to add MEFI 1 ECM's not the greatest to begin with and have a very limited range as far as reprograming. MEFI 1,2 & 3 are NLA even thru Mercruiser. If need one of those vintage ECM's its MEFI 4 that takes its place now a days. Also 1997 ECM's should not have been MEFI 1's to begin with as that should have been MEFI 2 or 3 by then. Your engine serial # would dictate what ECM should have been installed when this motor was in stock configuration. Good Luck
|
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 3484496)
Why where the knock sensors disconnected ?
|
ran way lean....either timing, fuel curve, or bad injectors...
|
Not sure about a MEFI 1, but a MEFI 3 will pull a predeterminded amount of timing out when the ECM can't detect the knock sensors (disconnected or connected improperly). It depends on the tune how much gets pulled. You could have retarded your timing a bunch by disconnecting the knock and shot your EGT's through the roof!
|
God I Love carb's for engines like these.
Sorry, I know, that's no help. |
Originally Posted by ezstriper
(Post 3485111)
ran way lean....either timing, fuel curve, or bad injectors...
|
Originally Posted by DesertRage
(Post 3485699)
Not sure about a MEFI 1, but a MEFI 3 will pull a predeterminded amount of timing out when the ECM can't detect the knock sensors (disconnected or connected improperly). It depends on the tune how much gets pulled. You could have retarded your timing a bunch by disconnecting the knock and shot your EGT's through the roof!
|
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 3485797)
God I Love carb's for engines like these.
Sorry, I know, that's no help. |
the MEFI 1,2,3 all use the same algorithm to retard timing. The observed variables are RPM, Knock Detection, IAT, MAP, ECT. MEFI 4 expands the spark retard by adding 4 additional variable. Then each computer has its own knock recovery table.
I have seen your described failure and it was attributed to detonation caused by either to little timing or to much timing. The heads you use have a great deal to do with timing tables. I am guessing you are still using the 088 heads. They have a pretty narrow ban.
Originally Posted by Inspector
(Post 3485845)
The Rinda software was reading 0 spark retard with the knock sensors disconnected so I am not sure the MEFI 1 has the same strategy as the MEFI 3?
|
Originally Posted by Inspector
(Post 3485849)
Carbs, Intakes and and MSD Distributors and looking pretty good about now...
Just in case that helps. :cool-smiley-011: Sorry for the carb talk. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.