![]() |
mike tkach is the man
Mike makes it look real easy, before I knew it the motor was running and we were looking for my oil leak..
http://33outlaw.zenfolio.com//img/s2...GVDj91nHpII9o= |
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 3903290)
Mike makes it look real easy, before I knew it the motor was running and we were looking for my oil leak..
http://33outlaw.zenfolio.com//img/s2...GVDj91nHpII9o= He also has a legit run stand. But to de-rig the trans, coolers, and all the other stuff, it just made sense to start it and let it run as it sat. Oil leak found, fixed, and ready to drop back in in short time....Nice. |
Originally Posted by Budman II
(Post 3903272)
Well, the twin engine thing is out the window for me since this is a single, but see where you're coming from. From the sound of things, I probably will have to do most of my tuning on the water anyway, so that normal benefit might not apply. I'm wondering if I might do better just to build myself a startup cart to run the engine before it gets dropped in. That would give me a lot of the benefits of the dyno, and I could use it for future builds. The warranty issue does not apply because I am building this thing myself.
I have one of those roll-around engine cradles available. I'm wondering if I could modify one of those to strengthen and stabilize it, and add a gauge panel and fuel delivery system to it. Running it on a stand followed by 02 tune in boat is a proven method but it does not give you the load and data you get from a dyno. The dyno makes it easy to make changes to the engine with real world results. Breaking in a engine using a load and not free wheeling the engine is also a plus. |
Budman II, I have to agree, with others.
Insuring the engine is properly broken in, and not damaged, due to haste. If something is incorrect; it will be easier to detect and correct, versus installing it in the boat and running it in a uncontrolled situation. You need a baseline to start with, adjusting A/F ratios in the boat after installation will surely, be minor. I would be 100% clear with whoever is doing this for you, that they break it in, and let things cool back down, double check everything and not just throw it up there, run the hell out of it and say: here you go. They have no invested interest in it, so you need to be clear of what you expect and what your end goals are. |
Originally Posted by MER Performance
(Post 3903474)
Budman II, I have to agree, with others.
Insuring the engine is properly broken in, and not damaged, due to haste. If something is incorrect; it will be easier to detect and correct, versus installing it in the boat and running it in a uncontrolled situation. You need a baseline to start with, adjusting A/F ratios in the boat after installation will surely, be minor. I would be 100% clear with whoever is doing this for you, that they break it in, and let things cool back down, double check everything and not just throw it up there, run the hell out of it and say: here you go. They have no invested interest in it, so you need to be clear of what you expect and what your end goals are. What additional goals might I want to state that I am after, aside from determining the optimal timing and jetting for the engine? Obviously I want to reveal any problems up front before it is installed. Is $500 about the going rate for this? |
Originally Posted by brian41
(Post 3903411)
Running it on a stand followed by 02 tune in boat is a proven method but it does not give you the load and data you get from a dyno. The dyno makes it easy to make changes to the engine with real world results. Breaking in a engine using a load and not free wheeling the engine is also a plus.
|
You definitely don't want to dyno it on race fuel and then run it on pump gas in the boat. That pretty much defeats the purpose. If you are running crappy ethanol based fuel in the boat, then run it on the dyno. That's what we do. If the customer can only get 89 octane with ethanol, then that's what it gets on the dyno.
Several (Steve, Brian, Mark) have mentioned the top reasons to dyno the engine. Nothing leaves my shop without hitting the dyno. The actual power number isn't the biggest reason for doing it. It breaks the engine in under a load in a controlled environment with WAY more data available then if you were bouncing down the lake. There are enough things to worry about the first time out with a new setup. You don't want to worry about the tune being totally in left field, oil leaks, etc. As for the dry headers, it not that big of a deal. Unfortunately, I can't run wet headers on the dyno either. We tune it a little lean on the dyno. How much depends on the boat's exhaust. If you are going to run silent choice or restrictive mufflers, expect the tune to richen 1 full point or more in the boat. With your Lightnings straight out the transom, expect about 1/2 point of AFR change. Once it's in the boat and running, it may be a little on the rich side. That's a quick and easy fix. At least you will know everything else is good. It will be money well spent. Good luck. Eddie |
Originally Posted by Budman II
(Post 3903272)
Well, the twin engine thing is out the window for me since this is a single, but see where you're coming from. From the sound of things, I probably will have to do most of my tuning on the water anyway, so that normal benefit might not apply. I'm wondering if I might do better just to build myself a startup cart to run the engine before it gets dropped in. That would give me a lot of the benefits of the dyno, and I could use it for future builds. The warranty issue does not apply because I am building this thing myself.
I have one of those roll-around engine cradles available. I'm wondering if I could modify one of those to strengthen and stabilize it, and add a gauge panel and fuel delivery system to it. |
As Eddie, said; running on race fuel defeats the purpose. The specific gravity, energy level, and fuel burn will be way off. I could see if you had 12:1 or higher c.r. or running some high boost.
If this guy is set on running that fuel, I would keep looking for someone else. Actually; running as lower c.r. would allow you to speed-up the burn and make more power. I am trying to understand how an experienced builder, operating his own dyno would always run race fuel, unless it's 96-97 octane unleaded. Even being so, if tuned to race fuel, leaving set-up and going into boat with pump gas, would most likely burn the engine up. What would he do; break it in rich and make all the pulls rich and wash the cylinders down and dilute the oil with fuel? I would be more comfortable, running the engine on the dyno on the lean side than in the boat, due to the fact the load can be controlled to engine speed. |
Originally Posted by MER Performance
(Post 3903676)
As Eddie, said; running on race fuel defeats the purpose. The specific gravity, energy level, and fuel burn will be way off. I could see if you had 12:1 or higher c.r. or running some high boost.
If this guy is set on running that fuel, I would keep looking for someone else. Actually; running as lower c.r. would allow you to speed-up the burn and make more power. I am trying to understand how an experienced builder, operating his own dyno would always run race fuel, unless it's 96-97 octane unleaded. Even being so, if tuned to race fuel, leaving set-up and going into boat with pump gas, would most likely burn the engine up. What would he do; break it in rich and make all the pulls rich and wash the cylinders down and dilute the oil with fuel? I would be more comfortable, running the engine on the dyno on the lean side than in the boat, due to the fact the load can be controlled to engine speed. Right now, if it turns out that I won't be able to dyno it on pump gas, I will probably pass on the dyno and just look into maybe setting up a startup cart for it. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.