Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Q & A (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q-20/)
-   -   flywheel vs. flexplate on small block alpha (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/311137-flywheel-vs-flexplate-small-block-alpha.html)

infiniti383 04-17-2014 06:16 PM

flywheel vs. flexplate on small block alpha
 
Im running 400 hp 355 small blocks with alpha drives using the coupler that attaches directly to the crank. These engines will only run 5500 rpm max. What id like to do is get rid of the heavy 153 tooth merc flywheels and go with 168 tooth SFI approved flexplates. The only disadvantage i can see in losing the heavy flywheel is losing the rotating inertia for shifting purposes at low rpm and possibly stalling instead of stumbling on the shift. I plan to idle between 700-800rpm in neutral. Let me know what you guys think. Im very curious as to what critical purpose the heavy wheel has in respect to my setup

HTRDLNCN 04-17-2014 07:05 PM

flexplates are meant to have a torque convertor to take the shock of power on power off,,
the shock of the prop engaging or throttling thru waves I imagine would not be good for a flexplate..
They do make aluminum flywheels that would accomplish your goal

infiniti383 04-17-2014 07:28 PM

How would the shock affect the flexplate if the coupler is not attached to it?

HTRDLNCN 04-17-2014 07:43 PM

good point...dunno then.. someone smarter than me will have to answer! :)

Mr Maine 04-17-2014 07:52 PM

I have a 375 horse 350. Put a 16 pound flywheel on it, figured the lighter flywheel would reduce rotational inertia for quicker reving, but not bring it as low as a flexplate and cause stalling during shifting. I have no issues. Also since my rpms are in the 5200-5600 range, and I am not slamming a clutch into it at 8000 rpm I was not as concerned with getting a high dollar race approved one. Also my legs aren't wrapped around the bell housing either.

compedgemarine 04-17-2014 07:52 PM

a lot of V-drive and jet boats run a flexplate, usually a JW Wheel or similar, to let the engine rev faster. these are light boats so the inertia of the flywheel is not as critical. I would think part would depend on the size and weight of the boat and the conditions you boat in. a heavy boat will pull the engine down faster or if you boat in rougher water that requires throttling alot the light flywheel may make the engine drop too much in rpm when you get off the throttle.

Steve H 04-17-2014 11:49 PM

What are you trying to accomplish with lighter flywheels?

ezstriper 04-18-2014 06:08 AM

in a heavier boat don't bother without a lot of H/P...

BenPerfected 04-18-2014 07:59 AM

Tried the flex plates and lost the ability to idle in gear. I have a two new flex plates available....cheap. Not a big deal to try as long as R&R the engine twice isn't a concern.

mike tkach 04-18-2014 08:48 AM

in your application a flexplate could be used bit imo it would be a waste of money as nothing would be gained.the only reason you need a flywheel or a flexplate is as a means to spin the engine for starting.

Bondo 04-18-2014 11:53 AM


Originally Posted by infiniti383 (Post 4108262)
Im running 400 hp 355 small blocks with alpha drives using the coupler that attaches directly to the crank. These engines will only run 5500 rpm max. What id like to do is get rid of the heavy 153 tooth merc flywheels and go with 168 tooth SFI approved flexplates. The only disadvantage i can see in losing the heavy flywheel is losing the rotating inertia for shifting purposes at low rpm and possibly stalling instead of stumbling on the shift. I plan to idle between 700-800rpm in neutral. Let me know what you guys think. Im very curious as to what critical purpose the heavy wheel has in respect to my setup

Ayuh,.... An idle of 800 rpms is Too high for an Alpha drive,...

'n with a flexplate, insteada a flywheel, it'll stall every time ya shift into gear,...

Really Bad idea, with No pay-back,...

dunnitagain 04-18-2014 06:50 PM


Originally Posted by infiniti383 (Post 4108262)
Im running 400 hp 355 small blocks with alpha drives using the coupler that attaches directly to the crank. These engines will only run 5500 rpm max. What id like to do is get rid of the heavy 153 tooth merc flywheels and go with 168 tooth SFI approved flexplates. The only disadvantage i can see in losing the heavy flywheel is losing the rotating inertia for shifting purposes at low rpm and possibly stalling instead of stumbling on the shift. I plan to idle between 700-800rpm in neutral. Let me know what you guys think. Im very curious as to what critical purpose the heavy wheel has in respect to my setup

The only advantage you'll gain is the total weight loss of the Flywheels . It wont Idle in Gear worth a dam , and losing the rotational inertia for faster accel , is negated by the Sterndrive anyway. The frictional losses of 2 , 90 degree gear sets way offsets your MOI reduction of lighter flywheels.

SB 04-18-2014 07:08 PM

Hull design, weight, and water itself (ie:load) vs engine power is our largest obstacle against acceleration rates of our boat. Not the engines ability to accelerate.

A small tunnel boat with big cid BBC may be a different story......but very small story.....lol.

infiniti383 04-18-2014 09:01 PM

okay guys sounds good I think I'll stick with the fly wheels.thank you everyone for your time

FIXX 04-18-2014 11:17 PM

i run a 434 hp 355,,like ,emtioned your not going to really notice the differance..tryed it in a stock cat with a small ram thripple disc set up..kept going through starters bendix's and sheering off the teeth on the flywheel..went back to the big flywheel..

vintage chromoly 04-19-2014 09:44 AM

Call me crazy but, I'm going to use an SFI rated flywheel on my bbc. Maybe it's overkill but for 225 bucks (made in USA, billet steel RAM) I'll take the peace of mind.

Even though there will be no "hit" like a manual gearbox drag car would see, the thought of a flywheel coming apart and tearing through my hull makes it cheap insurance.

mike tkach 04-19-2014 09:59 AM

i would be more concerned about a stock balancer,i have seen what can happen when one comes apart in a boat and it gets ugly.

ezstriper 04-19-2014 10:33 AM


Originally Posted by mike tkach (Post 4109052)
i would be more concerned about a stock balancer,i have seen what can happen when one comes apart in a boat and it gets ugly.

exactly...never seen a flywheel issue except on a drag boat..

vintage chromoly 04-19-2014 11:49 AM

I have an SFI damper as well.

Like I said, maybe overkill but at 225 bucks I'll take it. Also, I need a zero balance flywheel.

Several years back here in Cleveland, (when we use to have racing here) a team had a flywheel come apart and saw right trough the hull. They barely got the boat out of the water before it sunk.

ICDEDPPL 04-19-2014 02:53 PM

One advantage of a lighter flywheel is the rotational inertia would be less when the drive is coming in/out of the water therefore less stress on the drive.

SB 04-19-2014 08:22 PM

Nothing wrong with stepping up to SFI rated stuff......unless it's Procomp crap.

Falcon 04-19-2014 08:30 PM

Not a real advantage leaving the water, it will change rpm easier with less inertia if the throttle isn't pulled back. It should be a big advantage on reentry for any mismatch of rpm to boat speed.

phughes69 04-22-2014 11:05 AM

I doubt you'll get the boat out of gear at 700-880 RPM idle and at the at speed going into neutral, your going to eventually break something. The Alpha shift scenario is totally different than a Bravo or TRS. The lower the idle speed the easier it is on the outdrive.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.