![]() |
Originally Posted by rev.ronnie
(Post 4165930)
Honestly, a cylinder head set up like this benifet a greatly from higher compression (than stock) and a cam to compliment it. We have used 781 heads, with stock valve sizes and no porting and made 580+ hp with just 10.25:1 pistons and a generic Erson hydraulic flat tappet cam.
Would I put a fully reworked set of heads on a stone stock motor? Probably not worth the expense. Spending the money on pistons and a cam would net bigger results. |
Simple.
SPAM. ==================== You can run either or both...you just have to build for it and stay on top of it. Most biz's customers would not stay on top of it. |
I'm running 10.08:1 with iron heads, no issues.... Static compression isn't a good number to base any assumptions on as the cam, rods, and stroke dictate what your actual running (dynamic) compression is.
|
Originally Posted by Budman II
(Post 4166029)
Ronnie, I assume that the 10.25 CR was being run on one of your street car engines - as you probably know, that high of a CR would not live for long with iron heads in a marine engine. Same with the 110* LSA - you would be relegated to running dry exhaust.
As mentioned, people can wreck anything. This is the main reason we don't do retail work. Dealing with other businesses and engine shops eliminates this risk. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.