Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Q & A (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q-20/)
-   -   310 cc heads (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/332359-310-cc-heads.html)

horsepower1 11-19-2015 07:16 AM


Originally Posted by sutphen 30 (Post 4377596)
and again I'll say,the motor he posted w/ 240 cam doesn't make 700+hp.
just show you coolaide drinkers he was 30 degrees shorter on cam specs.650-670hp yes,but 700+hp,no way.
but you keep googling the knowledge you and he keep regurgitating.
just a search on here will give you all the combos to make some what advertised hp.

Why don't you tell us all WHY a 509 with a 240* cam won't make 700hp? We deal with customers who have over cammed, over headed, piss poor combinations that don't make power every day. Typical internet builds like the ones you posted links to. It's all too common and unfortunate when people spend a bunch of good money and follow really bad advice on trying to make good, usable power. The 509 that made 709hp had no port work done, no vac pump, no crank trigger, no trick carb, and had a hyd. roller. Funny thing is, we did the first pulls with the customer's 850 Demon vac. secondary carb and the best it did was 652 hp and 641 tq. The customer was pretty impressed, even at that, till I bolted the 850 DP and a 1" spacer on. Just a carb and spacer were worth over 50hp, and no one would have known the difference had we not tried.
So again, instead of just repeating something can't be done, just because YOU say so, tell us WHY.

kvogt 11-19-2015 07:41 AM

If you want to read about a bbc that made a little over 700 hp (900+) with a 240 @ 50 cam, you can go to web site with some fairly sharp people talking engine combos (yellow bullet). Look up a thread about "My 565" of Engine Masters experience".

For the record, I see Foxwell and Staub in the mix on that site but I don't see any famous engine marine designers over there. I also see head designers, NASCAR engine builders, Pro Stock engine teams, cam designers, spintron experts, as well as plenty of drag car guys. On a site with some heavy engine talent they seem to contribute quite well. It baffles me with this site's level of knowledge that we don't listen and learn a little better. For the record if Scott would have made that math error on yellow bullet several guys would have caught that and corrected it within 30 seconds (led by Stan Weis math expert). Maybe Scott didn't make a mistake and was testing us over here?

Zone 5 11-19-2015 08:49 AM


Originally Posted by Full Force (Post 4377661)
So you are just like most of us, your arguements are no different then any of ours...you are not engine builder but do this for a hobby...

Gee, the just typical BS response I thought I'd get. I hate to tell you, but you don't have to get paid for building engines to have been there done that. Not even getting into the boats, how many engines do you think we built in 9 years of racing? How many do you think we had spares of? I have no idea how many or if any motors you have ever built, for your own stuff, but I will bet that it was no where near that number. Not to mention that to keep up in racing the tech changes most times during the season which means even more tear downs. You ever pull the heads on a motor in the dark at midnight in a mud field?

So yea no, I'm not an engine builder. ;)

Zone 5 11-19-2015 08:58 AM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4377687)
Oso has become land of the guys who dont own an offshore boat, let alone any boat, guys who have non running engines, etc. Guys who claim success where there has been none, and love to talk behind the scenes about what they think they know. Most of these guys, are dead silent when it comes to talking about rigging boats, propping boats, setting up x dimensions, tuning, , and so on. But they are always there trolling to discredit others info, when their little light bulb goes off. Reversion! Yes!! Straub! Yes !

So you just described straub and foxwell. because straub can't use a screwdriver, nor can he "rig boats, prop boats, set up x dimensions, tuning, , and so on" Neither does foxwell. straub sells parts Ask him to use a wrench and he's done. and in foxwell own name dropping "biography" note that he has listed ONE jet boat. Thats it. ONE. If you want to call a jet boat offshore, you need to get back on Google!

Zone 5 11-19-2015 09:00 AM


Originally Posted by kvogt (Post 4377699)
For the record if Scott would have made that math error on yellow bullet several guys would have caught that and corrected it within 30 seconds (led by Stan Weis math expert). Maybe Scott didn't make a mistake and was testing us over here?

Because there are maybe 3 people here that know what it means and even less that care. This is NOT a drag race forum where 1 HP is the difference between winning and going home.

buck35 11-19-2015 09:09 AM


Originally Posted by horsepower1 (Post 4377681)
I never called anyone out on anything. I simply asked Zone5 to explain why he saiad 305's were "on the edge" of a 540 turning 5600 rpm and how/why 315's would be better...which he never did. I went ahead and tried to show, using solid, known design criteria, why he was wrong in that statement. The whole 7000rpm thing was just used for comparison example. I didn't amend my argument; my argument had nothing to do with a 540 turning 7000rpm. Funny thing is, I could have left it alone and no one here would have known the difference, especially Z5, but in the interest of full disclosure and posting correct information, I felt the need to make the correction. Sorry you feel the need to turn that into something negative.

I didn't intend to turn into a negative, I just asked a question, for my own knowledge. I have neither bashed nor cheered either side in this.
Another question, same 540 with 315s will it be a turd, have less power, or an unusable power band?

MILD THUNDER 11-19-2015 09:15 AM


Originally Posted by Zone 5 (Post 4377726)
Because there are maybe 3 people here that know what it means and even less that care. This is NOT a drag race forum where 1 HP is the difference between winning and going home.

And yet, you still cant answer why you are advising the 315 heads are the way to go, over the 305s , and what kind of gains will be seen

You keep reverting to how this isnt a car forum......well, many of the guys on those forums have built a good amount of offshore engines as well. You think alex haxby, dean gellner, richie zul, paul phaff, or many others, have never built a drag racing engine? And because they have, should we discredit their advice on a marine engine build ?

Darrin morgan and curtis boggs posts on those forums, should we ignore the cylinder head advice they give , because they dont normally deal with 600hp 509s with silent thunder exhaust?

Mike jones has a bunch of offshore engine builders that use his camshafts, and he posts on those sites. Should we discredit his valvetrain knowledge ?

Let me ask you. Offshoreexcursions 572 that made 750hp at 5900 with a 240ish straub cam, on an independent dyno, how does that stack up to your superb 637hp 509ci build ? Looks to me, he was making more hp per ci than your build. Was your engine dynoed with your silent thunder wet exhaust at that 637hp, or was that with dyno headers ? Do you have a dyno sheet on yours to post up, since you seem to enjoy discussing correction factors on others builds ..

Full Force 11-19-2015 09:27 AM

Still same as us, yes I have pulled many engines part the night before going racin and such, hence my boats name is quickchange.... You don't know me, I don't know you, but neither are professional builders and advice is just opinions. Simple as that...


Originally Posted by Zone 5 (Post 4377722)
Gee, the just typical BS response I thought I'd get. I hate to tell you, but you don't have to get paid for building engines to have been there done that. Not even getting into the boats, how many engines do you think we built in 9 years of racing? How many do you think we had spares of? I have no idea how many or if any motors you have ever built, for your own stuff, but I will bet that it was no where near that number. Not to mention that to keep up in racing the tech changes most times during the season which means even more tear downs. You ever pull the heads on a motor in the dark at midnight in a mud field?

So yea no, I'm not an engine builder. ;)


Zone 5 11-19-2015 09:27 AM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4377734)
And yet, you still cant answer why you are advising the 315 heads are the way to go, over the 305s , and what kind of gains will be seen.

I can't explain it to you because you, just like foxwell don't understand how airflow on a MARINE engine works.

But hey, the Holley chart says that a 502 only needs a 600-650 cfm carb. Try that on a BOAT and tell me how it works for you

Full Force 11-19-2015 09:28 AM

What about a 540 with 325's?


Originally Posted by buck35 (Post 4377730)
I didn't intend to turn into a negative, I just asked a question, for my own knowledge. I have neither bashed nor cheered either side in this.
Another question, same 540 with 315s will it be a turd, have less power, or an unusable power band?


Zone 5 11-19-2015 09:29 AM


Originally Posted by Full Force (Post 4377738)
Still same as us, yes I have pulled many engines part the night before going racin and such, hence my boats name is quickchange.... You don't know me, I don't know you, but neither are professional builders and advice is just opinions. Simple as that...

so you have to get paid to know anything for "fact"?

Full Force 11-19-2015 09:31 AM

Nope, just saying you discredit others and you are gospel, we see it otherwise .... So what's the difference? Thought so... I know fact also but people don't care because I am not a engine builder by trade....


Originally Posted by Zone 5 (Post 4377741)
so you have to get paid to know anything for "fact"?


horsepower1 11-19-2015 09:36 AM


Originally Posted by buck35 (Post 4377730)
I didn't intend to turn into a negative, I just asked a question, for my own knowledge. I have neither bashed nor cheered either side in this.
Another question, same 540 with 315s will it be a turd, have less power, or an unusable power band?

At that rpm there would be no difference that you could tell. The 315's might make the engine a little lazier, but not that you would probably notice. Certainly not worth the extra cost.

horsepower1 11-19-2015 09:43 AM


Originally Posted by Zone 5 (Post 4377739)
I can't explain it to you because you, just like foxwell don't understand how airflow on a MARINE engine works.

So now "marine engine" airflow is different than "car engine" air flow?
Well please, PLEASE explain that one...LOL...
Man, you really need to stop.

MILD THUNDER 11-19-2015 09:57 AM


Originally Posted by Zone 5 (Post 4377739)
I can't explain it to you because you, just like foxwell don't understand how airflow on a MARINE engine works.

But hey, the Holley chart says that a 502 only needs a 600-650 cfm carb. Try that on a BOAT and tell me how it works for you

Please stop trying to act like you have the slightest clue, about what i "understand" . While you have been standing at the dock dreaming of those silent thunder days, Ive done plenty of carb tuning on 900 plus hp roots blown marine engines , NA engines, and some blow thru deals making 1200 plus hp. and certainly not the guy who would be recommending a 650 carb on a marine 502. My current 468s have twin 850s on them.

What carb did you have on those 509s ?

Zone 5 11-19-2015 10:00 AM


Originally Posted by horsepower1 (Post 4377750)
So now "marine engine" airflow is different than "car engine" air flow?
Well please, PLEASE explain that one...LOL...
Man, you really need to stop.



For someone who is supposed to be so busy building things you sure have a lot of time to waste posting on the internet.

Unlike you, I do have things to do that are more important than trying once again to teach you the difference between a marine and drag engine.

where did I say the airflow was "different"?

Because you even have to ask me this question shows that you don't know anything about marine engines. (or I guess you think a 600 cfm carb is enough for a 502 marine engine). Maybe you should stick to drag racing sites.

you have a nice day posting while the rest of us that have work to do in our jobs get back to work.

Zone 5 11-19-2015 10:01 AM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4377758)
Please stop trying to act like you have the slightest clue, about what i "understand" . While you have been standing at the dock dreaming of those silent thunder days, Ive done plenty of carb tuning on 900 plus hp roots blown marine engines , NA engines, and some blow thru deals making 1200 plus hp. and certainly not the guy who would be recommending a 650 carb on a marine 502. My current 468s have twin 850s on them.

Just quoting the holley book to you. you are so in love with google that I thought I'd save you some time.

Full Force 11-19-2015 10:05 AM

So Dale, what's the deal on the heads? You have not posted the situation yet.. What's the deal?

Zone 5 11-19-2015 10:05 AM


Originally Posted by Full Force (Post 4377742)
Nope, just saying you discredit others and you are gospel, we see it otherwise .... So what's the difference? Thought so... I know fact also but people don't care because I am not a engine builder by trade....

I have enough hours and enough motors done to know BS builds when I see them. Just because I am not a "professional" has nothing to do with it. Just because you do it for a living, doesn't make you the expert. How many people thought Trick Marine was great???

Full Force 11-19-2015 10:08 AM


Originally Posted by Zone 5 (Post 4377763)
I have enough hours and enough motors done to know BS builds when I see them. Just because I am not a "professional" has nothing to do with it. Just because you do it for a living, doesn't make you the expert. How many people thought Trick Marine was great???

I dont do it for a living that's my point...let me ask you what would you recommend for a 35 mistress to see high 70's to 80 mph? Using 540 platform?

Went 73 with 598hp 661tq 565's before

MILD THUNDER 11-19-2015 10:10 AM

Zone 5, your technical insight on this thread, has been amazing.

horsepower1 11-19-2015 10:29 AM

Anyone is welcome to stop by the Piney Flats Industrial Park and drop in on us. The park entrance is 15 miles from I-81 and is 7 miles south of Bristol Motor Speedway. We lease 7500sq/ft of a 27Ksq/ft building. This houses offices, inventory, and cylinder head shop and our retail speed shop. We are open from 8;30AM to 6PM Monday thru Friday. Photo’s can be taken. You can meet us face to face or if you are going to PRI we are Booth 109 in the main hall in Indy.

F-2 Speedy 11-19-2015 10:31 AM

I was going to start a thread about max compression ratio on a blower application, but I think I'll pass, I may pm folks individually to get their opinions, carry on with this senseless crap

MILD THUNDER 11-19-2015 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by 33outlawsst (Post 4377775)
I was going to start a thread about max compression ratio on a blower application, but I think I'll pass, I may pm folks individually to get their opinions, carry on with this senseless crap

Im at 9:1 , with 155ish cranking compression, 6lbs boost, non intercooled, 34 deg total timing. Been that way for many years. Intercooolers going on this winter, to see what they do for me.

buck35 11-19-2015 10:49 AM


Originally Posted by horsepower1 (Post 4377746)
At that rpm there would be no difference that you could tell. The 315's might make the engine a little lazier, but not that you would probably notice. Certainly not worth the extra cost.

Thank you for the reply.

horsepower1 11-19-2015 11:23 AM


Originally Posted by 33outlawsst (Post 4377775)
I was going to start a thread about max compression ratio on a blower application, but I think I'll pass, I may pm folks individually to get their opinions, carry on with this senseless crap


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4377777)
Im at 9:1 , with 155ish cranking compression, 6lbs boost, non intercooled, 34 deg total timing. Been that way for many years. Intercooolers going on this winter, to see what they do for me.

That's about as far as I'd push a pump gas blower motor especially non intercooled. It's all about managing cylinder pressure. You can have more static and less boost for better throttle response and idling/low speed quality, or less static and more boost for more HP. Everything in an internal combustion engine is a compromise.

kvogt 11-19-2015 11:46 AM


Originally Posted by 33outlawsst (Post 4377775)
I was going to start a thread about max compression ratio on a blower application, but I think I'll pass, I may pm folks individually to get their opinions, carry on with this senseless crap


I prefer 8.2 to 8.5. The bigger the engine the lower I prefer. I tried going to 7.4 on some 605s. I usually use a theoretical compression of 184 psi max.

Zone 5 11-19-2015 11:55 AM


Originally Posted by Full Force (Post 4377764)
I dont do it for a living that's my point...let me ask you what would you recommend for a 35 mistress to see high 70's to 80 mph? Using 540 platform?

A blower.:D

If this was any other thread, I'd love to talk engines with you. But there is no way I am going there on this one.

Budman II 11-19-2015 12:04 PM

Geez, all I have to do is look at the title and the number of pages to tell if a thread has turned into a pizzing match. If it has "cylinder heads" or "camshaft" in the title, and it suddenly balloons beyond 20 pages, you can safely bet that it has degenerated into a "he said, she said" type of thread. :( :eek: :helmet:

Full Force 11-19-2015 12:09 PM


Originally Posted by Zone 5 (Post 4377805)
A blower.:D

If this was any other thread, I'd love to talk engines with you. But there is no way I am going there on this one.

then post it somewhere else... I would love to hear your findings it's easy to post other stuff why not now? If your so great let's see what's offered

bigboat28 11-19-2015 12:18 PM


Originally Posted by Full Force (Post 4377762)
So Dale, what's the deal on the heads? You have not posted the situation yet.. What's the deal?

Ok Tim i will lol. Heads are bought, Dart 310 Pro One heads, so.............tell me what rotating assembly i should run. What compression should i run and what rpm should i shoot for to end up with 700hp and lots of torque throughout the rpms. Also what would be a good cam to run? The blocks are gen 5s.

Full Force 11-19-2015 12:32 PM


Originally Posted by bigboat28 (Post 4377817)
Ok Tim i will lol. Heads are bought, Dart 310 Pro One heads, so.............tell me what rotating assembly i should run. What compression should i run and what rpm should i shoot for to end up with 700hp and lots of torque throughout the rpms. Also what would be a good cam to run? The blocks are gen 5s.

My best advice....PM Eddie Young as that's another thing that will be war here lol

horsepower1 11-19-2015 12:33 PM


Originally Posted by sutphen 30 (Post 4377596)
and again I'll say,the motor he posted w/ 240 cam doesn't make 700+hp.
just show you coolaide drinkers he was 30 degrees shorter on cam specs.650-670hp yes,but 700+hp,no way.
but you keep googling the knowledge you and he keep regurgitating.
just a search on here will give you all the combos to make some what advertised hp.

I'll say this: we do not have or own a dyno. The few complete engines we do here we use Bob Meyers of Automotive Performance and his DTS. Our induction packages have been dyno’d at Ricky Watters, Tony Skagen, Scoggin and Dicky, Mike Lewis, Al Parker, Owens Racing, Jon Kaase, Vrbanic Brothers, 3V Performance, Kuntz, Carrita’s, Dave Wesseldyk, Rick Rapp. To my knowledge not one customer has ever been told the numbers were BS. Some of these shops have actually become customers

mike tkach 11-19-2015 01:10 PM

can,t you guys see that zone5 likes to toot his own horn.he cant dazzel with briliance so he must baffle with bullchit.with every post he makes it becomes more clear that he likes to argue.at this point i pay little to no attention to him and the rest of you guys might want to ignore him.zone,i don,t have the time or desire to argue with you so when you reply to this post with your usual bullchit it won,t get me riled,in fact it won,t even get a response.

mike tkach 11-19-2015 01:12 PM


Originally Posted by horsepower1 (Post 4377774)
Anyone is welcome to stop by the Piney Flats Industrial Park and drop in on us. The park entrance is 15 miles from I-81 and is 7 miles south of Bristol Motor Speedway. We lease 7500sq/ft of a 27Ksq/ft building. This houses offices, inventory, and cylinder head shop and our retail speed shop. We are open from 8;30AM to 6PM Monday thru Friday. Photo’s can be taken. You can meet us face to face or if you are going to PRI we are Booth 109 in the main hall in Indy.

scott,i will be at the pri show.if i get time i will stop by and introduce myself.

horsepower1 11-19-2015 01:39 PM


Originally Posted by mike tkach (Post 4377835)
scott,i will be at the pri show.if i get time i will stop by and introduce myself.

I'll look forward to that. Thanks.

Zone 5 11-19-2015 02:00 PM


Originally Posted by mike tkach (Post 4377834)
can,t you guys see that zone5 likes to toot his own horn.he cant dazzel with briliance so he must baffle with bullchit.with every post he makes it becomes more clear that he likes to argue.at this point i pay little to no attention to him and the rest of you guys might want to ignore him.zone,i don,t have the time or desire to argue with you so when you reply to this post with your usual bullchit it won,t get me riled,in fact it won,t even get a response.

Really Mike? The fact that I (and many others) call BS on straub and foxwell is tooting my own horn?

I posted my background as requested. Seems that isn't good enough for you guys, (not being full time doesn't count) so you would rather listen to a guy who was kicked off this site and had to sneak back on with a different username. along with his boss who is banned from this site.

You seem to think that its okay for mild thunder to post total garbage and insults and thats fine. How about you call him out and explain that because he bolted a carb on an engine once that hes not an engine builder. But hey, he did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night so he must know what hes talking about.

Ignore my post all you want. Why would I care? you have sunk to the same level as foxwell and straub and a few others posting on this thread. I thought you were above this, but clearly you aren't.

Zone 5 11-19-2015 02:27 PM


Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER (Post 4377687)
Yep. This group of guys wants to constantly talk about peoples credentials. Like you said, most of us are boat owners and do it yourselfers here. They want to talk about others credentials, ....i dont see you or i claiming to have a engine building business, with a website listing all the things we do (when in reality do none of them). Giving me chit because i had mike t put my shortblocks together....

Id like to see the engines bob has built from scratch himself, rigged for marine, and installed in a boat, and ran for several seasons. I dont see anyone questioning whether he is qualified to discuss a lifter, when in fact he is not an engine builder either.

Oso has become land of the guys who dont own an offshore boat, let alone any boat, guys who have non running engines, etc. Guys who claim success where there has been none, and love to talk behind the scenes about what they think they know. Most of these guys, are dead silent when it comes to talking about rigging boats, propping boats, setting up x dimensions, tuning, , and so on. But they are always there trolling to discredit others info, when their little light bulb goes off. Reversion! Yes!! Straub! Yes !

Point blank. What makes you mad and why you posted that above, is why you should Ask Mr Foxwell and Mr Straub exactly what you wrote above, and have them put their experiences of what they have done in a real life offshore or any other I/O boat. Down in the bilge, from tuning, to rigging, to repairs, to propping, to changing outdrives. Any and all of that.

I want to see that here and I want you to see the truth.

brian41 11-19-2015 02:46 PM


Originally Posted by Zone 5 (Post 4377853)
Really Mike? The fact that I (and many others) call BS on straub and foxwell is tooting my own horn?

I posted my background as requested. Seems that isn't good enough for you guys, (not being full time doesn't count) so you would rather listen to a guy who was kicked off this site and had to sneak back on with a different username. along with his boss who is banned from this site.

You seem to think that its okay for mild thunder to post total garbage and insults and thats fine. How about you call him out and explain that because he bolted a carb on an engine once that hes not an engine builder. But hey, he did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night so he must know what hes talking about.

Ignore my post all you want. Why would I care? you have sunk to the same level as foxwell and straub and a few others posting on this thread. I thought you were above this, but clearly you aren't.

Zone you are wasting your time going back and forth with any of these guy's. straub and foxwell got kick off the site when this site meant something, the owners knew what was going on and the mods did their jobs. Those days are long gone and its threads like these that bring in the traffic that pay the bills. I am tired of fighting with these idiots, how about you start a thread over on BF about the chosen few that get to carry on over here and invite them there with mods to control the BS.

TAStevens 11-19-2015 03:17 PM

Damn! I just joined last year, retired Pro Drag Racer (asphalt) gone wet....what other sites might I like? I like TECH stuff...not bashing and measuring Dicks!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.