![]() |
scott,the supercharger,no matter the type or brand forces the air-fuel charge in the cylinder .as you said simple physics,the more air-fuel you put in the cylinder the more power it will make.for a n/a engine to achieve a ve similar to the boosted engine it needs much more cam.it also needs a higher compression ratio but thats for another day.what i am saying is the supercharged engine requires way less lift&duration than the n/a engine so even though their is more pressure against the exhaust valve it is still easier on the rest of the valve train than the n/a engine.example,try running a hyd roller on an engine like apache 14 has and see how long that will last,my bet is not long.the 262-270 at .050 with .647 lift hyd roller in my boosted 1200+hp engines won,t make power in his engines,simple physics!i agree with your statement that the boosted engine[ if it has a belt driven supercharger] makes more power at the piston,that is why i made my comment about using the right parts.does that hold true if the boost comes from a turbo charger?
|
Originally Posted by mike tkach
(Post 4412352)
scott,the supercharger,no matter the type or brand forces the air-fuel charge in the cylinder .as you said simple physics,the more air-fuel you put in the cylinder the more power it will make.for a n/a engine to achieve a ve similar to the boosted engine it needs much more cam.it also needs a higher compression ratio but thats for another day.what i am saying is the supercharged engine requires way less lift&duration than the n/a engine so even though their is more pressure against the exhaust valve it is still easier on the rest of the valve train than the n/a engine.example,try running a hyd roller on an engine like apache 14 has and see how long that will last,my bet is not long.the 262-270 at .050 with .647 lift hyd roller in my boosted 1200+hp engines won,t make power in his engines,simple physics!i agree with your statement that the boosted engine[ if it has a belt driven supercharger] makes more power at the piston,that is why i made my comment about using the right parts.does that hold true if the boost comes from a turbo charger?
Turbo engines have a unique circumstance where they run under back pressure during overlap and the piston isn't trying to come off the end of the rod when it changes direction like on other engines. Turbo engines are a lot easier on bottom ends but have their own need as far as reliability and longevity. Cyl pressure is cyl pressure. |
Whats a typical roots blower lets say 10-71 eat for horsepower at 1:1 ?
50hp? |
good discussion scott.i guess be it 1200 hp n/a or supercharged it will be hard on parts,if not everybody would have them.
|
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4412375)
Whats a typical roots blower lets say 10-71 eat for horsepower at 1:1 ?
50hp? |
dan,i can tell you that my spare engine made 1015 hp with the 16.71 and 1200+with the 8.3 whipple due to the difference in parasitic loss in the superchargers.the 16.71 eats power and generates heat,the whipple does neither.
|
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4412375)
Whats a typical roots blower lets say 10-71 eat for horsepower at 1:1 ?
50hp? |
takes power to make power,lol.
|
All this motor stuff has ruined car commercials for me.... just saw one on tv enthusiastically claiming 320 hp,, voice in my head went 320hp? your bragging about 320 hp.. lol
|
Originally Posted by mike tkach
(Post 4412385)
takes power to make power,lol.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.