![]() |
Originally Posted by vintage chromoly
(Post 4517864)
Cam motion reported that there is nothing wrong with the cam wear.
|
Pg 21 !
|
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4517860)
I didn't see the cams myself, only pictures posted of, so either the pics were extremely deceiving or camera angle/shadow etc or of different cams all together. I'm really confused now. Still waiting on comments from CM.
|
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4517868)
Really. By the pic it looks like .010 to .015 or so wear. Camera effects? Just asking cause I've run endurance cams for hundreds of hours and not have what appears to be wear from roller. Interesting though anyway. Tks for posting
As far as my duration before being OK? I will never agree with anyone that it was, less lift or not... |
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4517872)
I bet I have done more then anyone else here for looking into issues.
|
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4517870)
Pg 21 !
|
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4517874)
No.
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4517780)
I have not found another person that posted about porting the heads and such to see results... maybe I will be the first hope it's a good thread
|
Originally Posted by cigrocket
(Post 4517783)
315 CNC AFR apparently before they were on the **** list......lol
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4517876)
Wheres your boat and builds at? you have a twin engine offshore boat with 540's? or bigger? what is your engines? pics? what cam am I supposed to use? you never answered Joe...
You take every freakin thing as an attack. What the hell dude ? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.