![]() |
I was just being a dipschit. Pet peeve of mine the word 'stroker motor.' It's used so commonly some use it as an actual motor. Did not mean anything towards those that use it...just a mental issue I have. LOL.
|
I mentioned how "stroke" plays a big part in cam selection, or should I say , duration levels. Here are the cams my software spec's for the following combinations. This is based on a Dart 308 Head flow file, but you'll get the point .
For 5500 RPM MAX 454 230/236 (4.00x4.25) 502 233/239 (4.00x4.47) 489 239/245 (4.25x4.28) 540 243/249 (4.25x4.50) For 6000 RPM 454 243/248 502 246/252 489 253/258 540 256/262 Even though the 489 "stroker" , is smaller than a 502ci, it will require longer duration cam. Its not just cubic inch when playing the cam game. Full Force Tim's cam , was a 241/246. His cam was done right about 5400-5500rpm on the dyno. He gained about 7hp, from 5300 to 5900rpm. There is absolutely no reason, to spin his engines faster than about 5300rpm. Spinning an engine faster is ok, but only if there's power to be gained by doing so. Technically his HP "peaked" at 5800-5900, but that means nothing to me personally. |
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4516366)
Its official. Gonna have rmbuilder do my cams. Hopefully we can ramp my dynamic compression back up to maximize the gains
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4516386)
Id rather put a sail on it
You can always add one of those ebay electric superchargers..... Im guessing your pm box is getting full. And thanks for the laugh... |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4516467)
I mentioned how "stroke" plays a big part in cam selection, or should I say , duration levels. Here are the cams my software spec's for the following combinations. This is based on a Dart 308 Head flow file, but you'll get the point .
For 5500 RPM MAX 454 230/236 (4.00x4.25) 502 233/239 (4.00x4.47) 489 239/245 (4.25x4.28) 540 243/249 (4.25x4.50) For 6000 RPM 454 243/248 502 246/252 489 253/258 540 256/262 Even though the 489 "stroker" , is smaller than a 502ci, it will require longer duration cam. Its not just cubic inch when playing the cam game. Full Force Tim's cam , was a 241/246. His cam was done right about 5400-5500rpm on the dyno. He gained about 7hp, from 5300 to 5900rpm. There is absolutely no reason, to spin his engines faster than about 5300rpm. Spinning an engine faster is ok, but only if there's power to be gained by doing so. Technically his HP "peaked" at 5800-5900, but that means nothing to me personally. |
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4516478)
This is exactly what im looking for Good info. Thanks
|
Just looking at your components again and taking a shot at what I'd be looking for even being a custom grind the 741 fits like a glove.
|
Joe,
Why does stroke make more of a difference than bore? Don't they both create a pressure differential as the piston moves. |
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4516495)
Just looking at your components again and taking a shot at what I'd be looking for even being a custom grind the 741 fits like a glove.
|
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4516500)
I do have the cams listed and ran them all last season. No biggy. Considering everyone is saying 741, does anyone have a pair for sale??
|
Originally Posted by kvogt
(Post 4516497)
Joe,
Why does stroke make more of a difference than bore? Don't they both create a pressure differential as the piston moves. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.