![]() |
Big cube 454 for fun
So out of boredome lets build a 454.
4.375 (.125 over) and a 4.5 stroke for 541 cubes. Stock block with a horrible rod angle. Good heads, cam, etc. How does it do? |
Made about 650 horse with high oil temps from the friction caused by pistons trying to push there way out the side of the block, then picked up a bad tank of fuel and detonated the crap out of it leaving a good amount of aluminum stuck to the cylinders....sorry we got 18" of snow today and Ive got cabin fever 😁
|
I wonder how the bad rod angle would be in real life
|
Originally Posted by Mr Maine
(Post 4527614)
I wonder how the bad rod angle would be in real life
|
Originally Posted by Mr Maine
(Post 4527614)
I wonder how the bad rod angle would be in real life
most 454 blocks, will accept a 4.25 stroke, with no clearance issues, but, a 4.375, will need some clearancing. I would keep the bore to .060 over, unless you had some really rare blocks, that can go .100 over, and still sonic test ok. A oso buddy of mine is rebuilding a pair of 496ci, based off 427 tall deck truck blocks. He had one let go that trashed the crank. I tried talking him into 4.375 cranks for it, since he was buying two new cranks already, (other one was cast 4.25). But, I think his engine builder, didn't like the idea. Which I have not sure why, considering a 4.375 tall deck combination, is a proven combination, from GM and Mercury Racing. I may have even considered a 4.5" stroke, but not sure how much clearancing would be needed in the tall deck truck block, to fit it. |
Its just something i was thinking about for fun. I have seen 125 over 454s before though im sure they need to be checked and arent neccessarily for high output. If the 4.5 required tons of clearancing id stick with a 4.375.
I have a 454 out of an 88 1 ton and a buddy that wants to put it in his 78 short box 4x4. It would be low use, and not need to be a high turning engine. Thought it would be cool to make it a 526/540 with some 265 afr or 275 dart heads. |
cylinder wall would probably fail, or have terrible ring seal at best...only way to run this combo would be fill the block and run no water..better be drag use on alcohol...
|
Originally Posted by Mr Maine
(Post 4527666)
Its just something i was thinking about for fun. I have seen 125 over 454s before though im sure they need to be checked and arent neccessarily for high output. If the 4.5 required tons of clearancing id stick with a 4.375.
I have a 454 out of an 88 1 ton and a buddy that wants to put it in his 78 short box 4x4. It would be low use, and not need to be a high turning engine. Thought it would be cool to make it a 526/540 with some 265 afr or 275 dart heads. The trick flow 280 ovals are supposed to be pretty awesome. Comparable price to the afr 265s. |
Originally Posted by ezstriper
(Post 4527671)
cylinder wall would probably fail, or have terrible ring seal at best...only way to run this combo would be fill the block and run no water..better be drag use on alcohol...
What is recomended minimum wall thickness for a NA motor, no nitrous or anything? Wont bore it that far, just curious. |
http://garage.grumpysperformance.com...thickness.976/
Check out the video. Don't pay any attention to the Big Mac wrappers. Lol... |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.