Notices

Blower cams

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-27-2017, 06:20 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default Blower cams

We are always talking about cams for NA builds, but what about with forced induction?

Take a look at this, and let me know your opinions.

Lunati has a 250/255 112 LSA .630 lift cam, that is labeled a "supercharger" cam. Lets take a look at this cam, compared to a Crane 244/256 114 LSA, "651" that many like for supercharged engines, and is labeled a supercharger cam.

First, lets look at the exhaust timing events.

Exhaust valve opens at 61.5, and closes at 13.5 on the Lunati.

Exhaust valve opens at 67, and closes at 9 on the Crane 651.

Both exhaust lobes, have nearly identical .050 duration. Lunati at 255, and crane at 256. But look how different the exhaust timing events are. Anyone have any thoughts on WHY, and how that would affect things?
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 06:43 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: US of A
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Where do the intakes open on each as a comparison to the exhaust closing?
Eliminated572 is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 07:05 PM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eliminated572
Where do the intakes open on each as a comparison to the exhaust closing?
IO 15, IC at 55 on the lunati.

IO 13, IC at 51 on the crane.

Of course the crane is sporting 6* less duration on the intake side.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 07:22 PM
  #4  
Registered
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,302
Received 1,491 Likes on 806 Posts
Default

Is it maybe due to better flowing exhaust ports on aftermarket heads? Just a guess but 651 been around for years and possible was more toylored towards GMs chits exh port. Any thoughts? Just throwing this out there.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 07:28 PM
  #5  
Registered
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,302
Received 1,491 Likes on 806 Posts
Default

Did you compare it with the SR Crane I sent you last week.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 07:58 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: US of A
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
Is it maybe due to better flowing exhaust ports on aftermarket heads? Just a guess but 651 been around for years and possible was more toylored towards GMs chits exh port. Any thoughts? Just throwing this out there.
From the research I've done on even split (single pattern) cams (my whipple 500efi's have them)... the increased intake duration, or lack of favored exhaust for that matter, the more efficient the exhaust port/exhaust in general, the less exhaust duration desired vs intake. My theory is you want to limit intake blow thru as much as possible to take advantage of the blowers efficiency but have enough to clean the cylinder.
Eliminated572 is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 08:00 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: US of A
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Blower engines in general do not require near the exhaust scavenging due to positive pressure on the back side of the intake valve. In affect the blower induces the clean fill to a much larger extent and not need the overlap
Eliminated572 is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 08:15 PM
  #8  
Registered
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,302
Received 1,491 Likes on 806 Posts
Default

Efficiency is everything but again I think when were looking at two blower shelf cams with a noticeable difference in exh valve timing events. Exhaust port flow and what exhaust is being used for the particular build would come into play. Just getting back to OP.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 08:17 PM
  #9  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,546
Received 3,115 Likes on 1,402 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
First, lets look at the exhaust timing events.

Exhaust valve opens at 61.5, and closes at 13.5 on the Lunati.

Exhaust valve opens at 67, and closes at 9 on the Crane 651

Both exhaust lobes, have nearly identical .050 duration. Lunati at 255, and crane at 256. But look how different the exhaust timing events are. Anyone have any thoughts on WHY
Why they look are nearly identical but are quite different ?

Lunati is ground with 2* Advance . So being on a 112LSA, this puts ICL at 110* and ECL 114*
Crane ground with a 5* Advance. So, being on a 114LSA, this puts ICL at 109* and ECL at 119*

Last edited by SB; 02-27-2017 at 08:21 PM.
SB is offline  
Old 02-27-2017, 08:20 PM
  #10  
Registered
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,302
Received 1,491 Likes on 806 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eliminated572
Blower engines in general do not require near the exhaust scavenging due to positive pressure on the back side of the intake valve. In affect the blower induces the clean fill to a much larger extent and not need the overlap
Could very well be. I honestly don't know without researching it so will have to look up what most blower cams have for specs. If you get a chance MT post the specs of the sci one merc used.
getrdunn is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.