Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Timing vs AFR vs EGT >

Timing vs AFR vs EGT

Notices

Timing vs AFR vs EGT

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-19-2017, 09:58 AM
  #21  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,730
Received 4,285 Likes on 1,236 Posts
Default

About the Northstar :



Consider the Northstar engine. If you do a full throttle 0-60 blast, the engine will likely run up to 6000 RPM at a 11.5:1 or 12:1 air fuel ratio. But under sustained load, at about 20 seconds, that air fuel ratio is richened up by the PCM to about 10:1. That is done to keep the spark plugs cool, as well as the piston crowns cool. That richness is necessary if you are running under continuous WOT load. A slight penalty in horsepower and fuel economy is the result. To get the maximum acceleration out of the engine, you can actually lean it out, but under full load, it has to go back to rich. Higher specific output engines are much more sensitive to pre-ignition damage because they are turning more RPM, they are generating a lot more heat and they are burning more fuel. Plugs have a tendency to get hot at that high specific output and reaction time to damage is minimal.

A carburetor set up for a drag racer would never work on a NASCAR or stock car engine because it would overheat and cause pre-ignition. But on the drag strip for 8 or 10 seconds, pre-ignition never has time to occur, so dragsters can get away with it. Differences in tuning for those two different types of engine applications are dramatic. That's why a drag race engine would make a poor choice for an aircraft engine.
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Old 11-19-2017, 10:36 AM
  #22  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (6)
 
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest & T-Rock
Posts: 10,416
Received 3,043 Likes on 1,355 Posts
Default

LOL.........

Last edited by F-2 Speedy; 11-19-2017 at 12:52 PM.
F-2 Speedy is offline  
Old 11-19-2017, 10:53 AM
  #23  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: KY
Posts: 4,102
Received 471 Likes on 367 Posts
Default

Great read, thanks
AllDodge is offline  
Old 11-19-2017, 11:25 AM
  #24  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,730
Received 4,285 Likes on 1,236 Posts
Default

Many times you will see a piston that is scuffed at the "four corners". If you look at the bottom side of a piston you see the piston pin boss. If you look across each pin boss it's solid aluminum with no flexibility. It expands directly into the cylinder wall. However, the skirt of a piston is relatively flexible. If it gets hot, it can deflect. The crown of the piston is actually slightly smaller in diameter on purpose so it doesn't contact the cylinder walls. So if the piston soaks up a lot of heat, because of detonation for instance, the piston expands and drives the piston structure into the cylinder wall causing it to scuff in four places directly across each boss. It's another dead give-a-way sign of detonation. Many times detonation damage is just limited to this.








Engines that are detonating will tend to overheat, because the boundary layer of gas gets interrupted against the cylinder head and heat gets transferred from the combustion chamber into the cylinder head and into the coolant. So it starts to overheat. The more it overheats, the hotter the engine, the hotter the end gas, the more it wants to detonate, the more it wants to overheat. It's a snowball effect. That's why an overheating engine wants to detonate and that's why engine detonation tends to cause overheating.


lots of heat in that piston.





Current piston after a season of hard running looking good.

ICDEDPPL is offline  
Old 11-19-2017, 11:44 AM
  #25  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Max timing not brought in until

525SC = 35* at 4500 RPM
600SC = 33* at 5000 RPM
800SC = 28* at 5000 RPM

Cruising timing at 3500 RPM approx
525SC = 30
600SC = 28
800SC = 24

Timing at 2500 (planing area )
525SC= 27
600SC= 22
800SC =20

Not sure where the whole concept of locking the timing , or "bringing it all in by 3000" came from for a supercharged marine engine. NA engine, I could see why they did bring it all in by 3000.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 11-19-2017, 11:48 AM
  #26  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,730
Received 4,285 Likes on 1,236 Posts
Default

Another thing you can do is increase the burn rate of the combustion chamber. That is why with modem engines you hear about fast burn chambers or quick burn chambers. The goal is the faster you can make the chamber burn, the more tolerant to detonation it is. It is a very simple phenomenon, the faster it burns, the quicker the burn is completed, the less time the end gas has to detonate. If it can't sit there and soak up heat and have the pressure act upon it, it can't detonate.

My head guy is a big proponent of modifying the crappy BBC chamber design for a better flame front and burn.

40 man hours into the chambers alone


ICDEDPPL is offline  
Old 11-19-2017, 11:56 AM
  #27  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,730
Received 4,285 Likes on 1,236 Posts
Default

A case for flat top pistons:


A nice compact chamber is best; that's why the four valve pent roof style chambers are so popular. The flatter the chamber, the smaller the closed volume of the chamber, the less dome you need in the piston. We can get inherently high compression ratios with a flat top piston with a very nice bum pattern right in the combustion chamber, with very short distances, with very good mixture motion - a very efficient chamber.

Look at a Northstar or most of the 4 valve type engines - all with flat top pistons, very compact combustion chambers, very narrow valve angles and there is no need for a dome that impedes the burn to raise the compression ratio to 10:1.
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Old 11-19-2017, 12:06 PM
  #28  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

A widely-held myth is that maximum advance always means maximum power. Here’s what’s wrong with this thinking:The spark plug ignites the mixture and the fire starts burning. The speed of this flame front depends on the mixture, this means how many air and fuel molecules are packed together in the combustion chamber. The closer they are packed together in the same volume, the easier it is for the fire to jump from one set of molecules to the other. The burning speed is also dependent on the air-fuel-ratio. At about 12.5 to 13 air-fuel-ratio the mixture burns fastest. A leaner mixture than that burns slower. A richer mixture also burns slower. That's why the maximum power mixture is at the fastest burn speed. It takes some time for this flame front to consume all the fuel in the combustion chamber. As it burns, the pressure and temperature in the cylinder increases. This pressure peaks at some point after TDC. Many experiments have shown that the optimum position for this pressure peak is about 15 to 20 degrees after TDC. The exact location of the optimum pressure peak is actually independent of engine load or RPM, but dependent on engine geometry. Typically all the mixture is burned before about 70 deg ATDC. But because the mixture density and AFR in the engine change all the time, the fire has to be ignited just at the right time to get the peak pressure at the optimal point. As the engine speed increases, you need to ignite the mixture in the combustion chamber earlier because there is less time between spark and optimum peak pressure angle. If the mixture density is changed due to for example boost or higher compression ratio, the spark has to be ignited later to hit the same optimal point. If the mixture is ignited to early, the piston is still moving up towards TDC as the pressure from the burning mixture builds. This has several effects:
  • The pressure buildup before TDC tries to turn the engine backward, costing power.
  • The point where the pressure in the cylinder peaks is much closer to TDC, with the result of less mechanical leverage on the crankshaft (less power) and also causes MUCH higher pressure peaks and temperatures, leading to knock.
Many people with aftermarket turbos don't change the spark advance very much, believing that earlier spark creates more power. To combat knock they make the mixture richer. All that happens really then is that the mixture burns slower and therefore hits the peak pressure closer to the right point. This of course reaffirms the belief that the richer mixture creates more power. In reality the flame front speed was adjusted to get the right peak pressure point. The same result (with more power, less emissions and less fuel consumption) could be achieved by leaving the mixture at the leaner optimum and retarding the ignition more instead.Turbo charging or increasing the compression ratio changes the mixture density (more air and fuel molecules are packed together). This increases the peak pressure and temperature. The pressure and temperature can get so high that the remaining unburned mixture ignites by itself at the hottest part in the combustion chamber. This self-ignition happens explosively and is called 'knock'. All engines knock somewhat. If there is very little unburned mixture remaining when it self-ignites, the explosion of that small amount does not cause any problems because it can't create a large, sharp pressure peak. Igniting the mixture later (retarding) causes the peak pressure to be much lower and cures the knock.The advances in power of modern engines, despite the lower quality of gasoline today, comes partially from improvements in combustion chamber and spark plug location. Modern engines are optimized so that the flame front has the least distance to travel and consumes the mixture as fast as possible. An already burned mixture can no longer explode and therefore higher compression ratios are possible with lower octane fuel. Some race or high performance engines actually have 2 or three spark plugs to ignite the mixture from multiple points. This is done so that the actual burn time is faster with multiple flame fronts. Again, this is to consume the mixture faster without giving it a chance to self-ignite.Higher octane fuel is more resistant to self-ignition. It takes a higher temperature and pressure to cause it to burn by itself. That's why race fuels are used for engines with high compression or boost. Lead additives have been used, and are still used to raise the self-ignition threshhold of gasoline, but lead is toxic and therefore no longer used for pump-gas. Of course a blown engine is toxic to your wallet.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 11-19-2017, 12:31 PM
  #29  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lees Summit ~ LOTO 10MM
Posts: 2,981
Received 121 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

You two are on a roll
endeavor1 is offline  
Old 11-19-2017, 12:37 PM
  #30  
Registered
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,301
Received 1,490 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

https://www.cidheads.com/collections...-per-pair-bare
getrdunn is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.