![]() |
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4602809)
Aren't those Siamese anyway?
|
I stayed at 4.530 but made a drunk decision of going SC.
|
Originally Posted by 14 apache
(Post 4602807)
You wont have a problem with a big M at 4.600 in a NA engine the walls are still thicker than a 454. Like the iron heads on that combo.
|
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4602814)
I stayed at 4.530 but made a drunk decision of going SC.
|
Originally Posted by Rhythm and Blues
(Post 4602815)
I hear ya, yeah I didnt think I’d have any sort of a problem from the 598 at 4.600, it was more of apprehension of rebuilds down the road and only having .025 to work with. Dart claims 4.625 max I believe. I kinda thought it would be cool if I could make up in cubes what I would loose in going from aluminum heads 10:1 to iron heads 9.8:1... It’d be real nice to keep it around 750/side..
If I had a 572, with good pistons and bores, I'd leave it. If I had to buy a set of pistons, I'd bore it to 4.600 with that Dart block. I wouldnt sweat the head gasket material between the cylinders, especially with iron heads. Theres tons of 4.600 bore engines out there doing fine. |
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4602810)
I was thinking you still have .300 btwn cylinders if I'm not mistaking. Safely go 4.600 but some don't like the gasket.
This is where a 5" bore spacing would pay off. I would love to build nice marine motors at 700" |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4602934)
I doubt you'd lose anything. Aluminum itself doesnt flow better than cast iron. The 2/10ths of compression isnt gonna matter. I'd focus on the heads condition and flow. A simple nice valve job, blend etc could be worth as much power as you'd gain with an extra 26 cubic inches if the current valve job sucks. Just had a friends Merlin iron heads over here. Good god , those things are F'cking awful in stock form. The transition from the valve seat into the chamber is horrid. The lips from the throat to the seat is horrid. No backcut on the intake valves, and had a chitty valve job on them. Tons of airflow potential with just a little TLC .
If I had a 572, with good pistons and bores, I'd leave it. If I had to buy a set of pistons, I'd bore it to 4.600 with that Dart block. I wouldnt sweat the head gasket material between the cylinders, especially with iron heads. Theres tons of 4.600 bore engines out there doing fine. |
Originally Posted by 14 apache
(Post 4602937)
BBC bore spacing is 4.84 so you will end up with .240 between cylinders at 4.600
This is where a 5" bore spacing would pay off. I would love to build nice marine motors at 700" |
2 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by 14 apache
(Post 4602937)
BBC bore spacing is 4.84 so you will end up with .240 between cylinders at 4.600
This is where a 5" bore spacing would pay off. I would love to build nice marine motors at 700" |
What model Iron Eagles do you have? 345's?
One of the benefits of a large bore, besides more cubes, is it helps cylinder head airflow. If you have a head with a 2.30 valve and a chamber designed around a 4.250 bore, taking advantage of unshrouding the valve by pulling back the chamber some is a nice improvement in airflow. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.