![]() |
true, once you cross over that power level, boosted is the only way to make it,,,,but makes my ass pucker thinking about keeping each cylinder equally happy when laying in the throttle lol
|
Why don't more use the LS7 (427) based LS motors? At least for a boat it would help with displacement. Seems a SC version would be a nice package.
I keep wondering how these would be if you just wanted light weight and smaller footprint as a replacement for HP 500's. For the ski boat world PCM says it will give you a 5 year warranty on them. http://www.gmpowertrain.com/engines/...0Sheet.pdf?v=2 |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4656522)
I think like rookie said, sometimes the dyno king number isnt always the fastest setup.
then you have the whole dyno correction factor stuff, plus many dont dyno fully dressed in marine trim. Dyno headers vs manifolds can be significant, as well as sea pump, water pump, alternator, steering pump, etc. That stuff could add up to 50+hp losses Add water pumps, alternator, power steering pump, manifolds, wet exhaust,,,,,, I would like to see the numbers then. |
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 4656573)
Why don't more use the LS7 (427) based LS motors? At least for a boat it would help with displacement. Seems a SC version would be a nice package.
I keep wondering how these would be if you just wanted light weight and smaller footprint as a replacement for HP 500's. For the ski boat world PCM says it will give you a 5 year warranty on them. http://www.gmpowertrain.com/engines/...0Sheet.pdf?v=2 |
Originally Posted by Baja Rooster
(Post 4656537)
I remember someone selling a pair of LS after switching out the big blocks in a Fountain because they just didn’t measure up torque wise but I think it was a 33’. So many variables though. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...547ceaaa3.jpeg |
242LS, interesting graph. The torque and HP advantage from 4-5k is pretty decent on the 509. Looks like the 509 runs out of cam/valve train past 6K. But I would not think you would want to spin a BBC boat motor much past 6K anyway. Beyond that there is obviously so many many other factors than just displacement. There are some pretty cool comparisons of stuff like this on "motortrendondemand" specifically the engine masters series. You can watch them for free with advertisements. But I pay the $4 a month for the membership. There is so much content. I hardly even watch regular TV anymore.
John |
Cool graph to compare.Thanks.
Speaking of 32 Sunsations vs engines Any of you guys remember Domscott from Speedwake days? Older nonstepped 32 Sunsation Dominator. 502's/fact rect heads other than springs and etc/ 741 cams/ lightning headers / small 174blowers/nose cones on the Bravo's and Sternjack's of all things ran just over 100. |
Dyno graphs and sheets are a nice discussion piece but a lot of variables can alter them. Correction factor, how the engine was dynoed meaning accessories and exhaust. Although an invaluable tool for tuning and setting up a new engine they aren’t the end all be all. Many guys show high dyno numbers and the boat is no faster or barely faster than same hull with stock power. I believe the 32 sunny mentioned is one of those. While the LS dyno sheets look good I think I saw stayed in the ad he only ran 88. Some quick research shows the non stepped take about 700 and the stepped about 600 to get near 100. |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4656608)
Cool graph to compare.Thanks.
Speaking of 32 Sunsations vs engines Any of you guys remember Domscott from Speedwake days? Older nonstepped 32 Sunsation Dominator. 502's/fact rect heads other than springs and etc/ 741 cams/ lightning headers / small 174blowers/nose cones on the Bravo's and Sternjack's of all things ran just over 100. Thats also when/where I met Bailey with procharged 502's that I mentioned earlier. John |
Great graph. If you can get the engines up to 5600 those engines would scream until the bravo melted. Are those engines with blowers? That would seem mandatory on an LS. |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4656608)
Cool graph to compare.Thanks.
Speaking of 32 Sunsations vs engines Any of you guys remember Domscott from Speedwake days? Older nonstepped 32 Sunsation Dominator. 502's/fact rect heads other than springs and etc/ 741 cams/ lightning headers / small 174blowers/nose cones on the Bravo's and Sternjack's of all things ran just over 100. |
Originally Posted by hogie roll
(Post 4656623)
Tuning up the smallest twin engine boats seems smart if your budget forces you to stay with bravos. Something that really flys with 600hp. Early dominators are one of the most affordable candidates. They're going in a Sutphen 30' Ocean Pacer. Should do well. |
Originally Posted by 242LS
(Post 4656600)
I was thinking about the "no replacement for displacement" comment and remembered I had a graph of the dyno results from my old 509s (HP500s w/Marine Kinetics CAM w/AFR heads) to compare against Dennis' 416CI LS3 motors from Swap Shop. I added the numbers from his dyno sheet to compare.....
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...547ceaaa3.jpeg |
Originally Posted by Baja Rooster
(Post 4656577)
Ill speculate that the main reason is 427 is the limit where most here want 502s at a minimum where even 454s aren’t enough, and the LS is still cost prohibitive. In 30’ and less they seem perfect. Thinking out loud, the LS offers variable cam timing, more modern design, and small weight/ size. In anything over 30 I don't think it would matter but in something like my little boat I do think it would. Looking at the picture of the LS in the Sunny the distance between the headers were NICE. Does seem the cost is a issue. |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4656608)
Cool graph to compare.Thanks.
Speaking of 32 Sunsations vs engines Any of you guys remember Domscott from Speedwake days? Older nonstepped 32 Sunsation Dominator. 502's/fact rect heads other than springs and etc/ 741 cams/ lightning headers / small 174blowers/nose cones on the Bravo's and Sternjack's of all things ran just over 100. |
Originally Posted by jadento
(Post 4656614)
Yes I met Scott may years ago at the Sunsation Rally. Think the boat was bright green and black. Your details sound right and yes he said it would run 100. Personally I didnt really buy it, but whatever. Like ive already said. The 509's in the Sunsation I had dynoed at 650hp(dyno headers, no accessories) and it did 92 as an average. You can do the math.
Thats also when/where I met Bailey with procharged 502's that I mentioned earlier. John |
Originally Posted by Knot 4 Me
(Post 4656722)
A true 100+ MPH Dominator was Dragonheart.
John |
Originally Posted by XtremeCFM
(Post 4656571)
true, once you cross over that power level, boosted is the only way to make it,,,,but makes my ass pucker thinking about keeping each cylinder equally happy when laying in the throttle lol
Back to our regularly scheduled programming... |
well the lsa take-off's are running about $1200 on ebay from what im seeing lately,,,they were alot cheaper and plentiful when gm was replacing them under warranty. The reason for them being replaced thru gm was due to the spring isolator making noise, which everyone just installed a solid one.
So then you need the lid with heat exchanger brick, a new camaro zl1 is about $600, sometimes you can find the cts-v take offs from one that upgraded to the zl1 lid for a few hundred. Then you need fuel rails for the lsa blower $285 To adapt the blower to a cathedral port head, you need the adapters which are about $175 Used take off injectors from a cts-v or zl1 should only be about $100 On ebay you can get front mount heat exchangers and pump for under $200 with all the hoses. then to run your accessories, lets say on a truck, LSX innovations makes a real nice and simple setup to drive everything off one belt for $325 Thats about it really almost at 10 posts! |
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 4656574)
Joe you would love this, I seen one builder selling 650 HP 540 cu in motors. Shows the dyno run, long tube headers, no accessories even running a electric water pump.
Add water pumps, alternator, power steering pump, manifolds, wet exhaust,,,,,, I would like to see the numbers then. |
This weekend i just swapped my original Merc 377 (6.2) out of my 2009 Pachanga for a new all aluminium GM crate 6.2 Supercharged LSA engine (556HP & 551TQ). Used original Merc bell housing with a Ram Clutches conversion flywheel ($300ish) & the original motor mounts with LS adapter mounts all in the factory holes into stringers. I'd add pictures but I'm too new I need more posts lol. Anyways all bolted up easy...
|
Originally Posted by 15x
(Post 4657589)
This weekend i just swapped my original Merc 377 (6.2) out of my 2009 Pachanga for a new all aluminium GM crate 6.2 Supercharged LSA engine (556HP & 551TQ). Used original Merc bell housing with a Ram Clutches conversion flywheel ($300ish) & the original motor mounts with LS adapter mounts all in the factory holes into stringers. I'd add pictures but I'm too new I need more posts lol. Anyways all bolted up easy...
|
Still waiting on headers & a few other things to finish up. Or if your asking it is a GM Performance crate engine yes.
|
Originally Posted by 15x
(Post 4658741)
Still waiting on headers & a few other things to finish up. Or if your asking it is a GM Performance crate engine yes.
|
No I did not buy the marine version as the marine unit has the less desirable intercooler. The motors are identical from the block to crank, rods, pistons, cam, heads, etc... Only information i couldn't find out about is the head gaskets. I'm running a closed cooling system as I'd think most would on an Aluminium block so there will be no issues with raw water/salt corrosion.
|
Originally Posted by 15x
(Post 4658767)
No I did not buy the marine version as the marine unit has the less desirable intercooler. The motors are identical from the block to crank, rods, pistons, cam, heads, etc... Only information i couldn't find out about is the head gaskets. I'm running a closed cooling system as I'd think most would on an Aluminium block so there will be no issues with raw water/salt corrosion.
|
Yes, CMI marine E-Top header
Custom Marine Inc. - It's All About Performance - Header Applications - LS E-Top Headers |
Originally Posted by XtremeCFM
(Post 4656317)
Hey guys, i have a scarab panther 30' that i have the twin 454ci motors out of it, i was going to build them up NA to make about 680ish hp.
Im a LSX guy here and prepare many LS builds, head porting and specialize with the LSA's LS9's LS7's, LS3's and so on, big with the cts-v's and zr1's. So im up in the air if i should just keep it simple and build up the original motors or swap out for the new tech....i can put together a pair of stock bottomend ls3's that make roughly the same in power, but just curious if others have done the swap and what have they seen different with their boat in performance and economy? Im sure the ls motors would use half the fuel, but will the boat be a total dog and not have enough ass behind it to get it up and going. Any insight would be great. Thanks Tony |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.