Notices

CMI headers

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-14-2019, 10:55 AM
  #41  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cheboygan, MI
Posts: 1,621
Received 398 Likes on 229 Posts
Default

I have lightning headers on my boat and they are going on 20+ years. I sent them in for testing a while back and I've run my camera down the tubes and they look like new. They have the longest tubes of anything that I have seen. yes they are lightly wider than the cast systems, but the tubes have longer radii than the cast style as well. For the difference in price have them powder coated any color you like. While I haven't personally run a side by side on my engine with other products, there is enough empirical evidence to indicate their design is suited for maximum power. It all depends on your motor setup and where you want the peak performance to occur. I have more low to mid range torque than my bravo can handle already so I'm going for maximum horsepower.
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Old 01-14-2019, 11:15 AM
  #42  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,546
Received 3,115 Likes on 1,402 Posts
Default

Shhhhhh.....The Parvey's designed and sold these first....PF Marine. KE bought the whole deal from them and sold them for many years.... Now, our good man Diamomd Marine bought the whole deal from KE,

If someone doesn;t know the Parvey's, KE, and Diamond...then you need to !!!


Last edited by SB; 01-14-2019 at 11:22 AM.
SB is offline  
Old 01-14-2019, 11:27 AM
  #43  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Whitefish Chain - Crosslake, MN
Posts: 430
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Well, I know the guy who designed the TnL headers and he did make them for bigger motors. As analytical as that guy is, if he put any effort into them, he did them right, not blingy. I mean he's only running what 165 at the LOTO shootout in a V with a motor package of his design. CMIs are cool though. I'll probably be ditching my EMIs for Lightning on my SBC.

*Edit* SB, didn't see your comment. Right on.
ACrooks69 is offline  
Old 01-14-2019, 02:54 PM
  #44  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,735
Received 4,305 Likes on 1,241 Posts
Default

Getting rid of Headeraches is thee best thing I`ve done. Don`t miss spending a bunch of time trying to tighten header bolts or seperate the tails either.

Takes about a minute to pull the manifolds. (out of boat )



Last edited by ICDEDPPL; 01-14-2019 at 03:12 PM.
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Old 01-14-2019, 07:12 PM
  #45  
Registered
 
Tinkerer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ALTO, MI
Posts: 4,612
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I didn't say that they wouldn't work on a blower engine. I said that I heard they were a little restrictive. Unless they have changed them.
Tinkerer is offline  
Old 01-15-2019, 07:45 AM
  #46  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL; Onekama, MI
Posts: 3,887
Received 121 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tinkerer
I didn't say that they wouldn't work on a blower engine. I said that I heard they were a little restrictive. Unless they have changed them.
If I remember right they had a 2" runner. So until you get into the really big power blower motors, they are great. Also the collector is 3.5" so a bit of a restriction there as well. However, even the CMI Big tube e-tops only have a 3.5" collector opening, and they are so wide they will not work in a side by side boat. I know, because I tried. Like anything there is no one size fits all header, but the T&L are a great choice. For really big power Stainless Gen IIIs are the ticket, like Dan has.

I was pulling the headers on my engines last night (sport tubes), i will say this, they are so easy to remove. You can work from both sides of the header, you can't do that with a manifold. So they get a thumbs up for bling, and being really easy to work with.
endeavour32 is offline  
Old 01-19-2019, 01:25 PM
  #47  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Avon, OH
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default


I think the lightnings look pretty good and for the price!
ttrm007 is offline  
Old 02-10-2019, 11:23 AM
  #48  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hudson, IL
Posts: 581
Received 83 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Good luck with those! Every engine that I have seen with those have been due to the headers rotting out and water filling the engine.
Precision is offline  
Old 02-11-2019, 02:14 PM
  #49  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Whitefish Chain - Crosslake, MN
Posts: 430
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Precision
Good luck with those! Every engine that I have seen with those have been due to the headers rotting out and water filling the engine.
are you taking about the CMIs or Lightnings with that reference?
ACrooks69 is offline  
Old 02-11-2019, 04:43 PM
  #50  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hudson, IL
Posts: 581
Received 83 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ACrooks69
are you taking about the CMIs or Lightnings with that reference?
Sorry for the confusion. I was referencing the Lightning’s. They all rotted out from the inside.
Precision is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.