Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Q & A (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q-20/)
-   -   Chamber porting for dropping compression (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/358555-chamber-porting-dropping-compression.html)

rob vanharten 01-13-2019 03:26 PM

Chamber porting for dropping compression
 
Jim V is going to be porting my combustion chambers to help reduce the compression on my Promaxx heads in preparation for boost. They start at 119cc, does anyone have any experience on how many cc’s can be removed on a head like this?

Baja Rooster 01-13-2019 04:04 PM

When I was done cleaning up the Edelbrock chambers it removed 10cc by the time I was done and good for .68 of a compression point.

Rookie 01-13-2019 04:46 PM


Originally Posted by rob vanharten (Post 4667942)
Jim V is going to be porting my combustion chambers to help reduce the compression on my Promaxx heads in preparation for boost. They start at 119cc, does anyone have any experience on how many cc’s can be removed on a head like this?

Rob, When Valako chamber ported my heads he got me to 129cc on Darts combustion chambers. Did you tell Jim where you wanted to be at? He didn't just do a fluff and buff on my chambers. It was strategic to optimize flow and ward off detonation. I'll assume he'll do the same for you. I run 87 octane in my engines. I actually gained RPM after I removed 0.70 of compression.

rob vanharten 01-13-2019 06:40 PM

Jason, I spoke with Jim on Saturday regarding my project. I am sitting around 9.8 right now and would like to get down in the 8.5-8.75 range. I understand this will not be doable with the porting alone but am hoping he can remove as much as possible while helping flow. I will still have to run thicker head gaskets but I am trying to run the thinnest gasket possible after the porting to get me to my desired compression ratio. Jim was thinking he could get them into the upper 120’s while increasing flow. I would be very happy with 10cc’s but a little more would be even better!!

hogie roll 01-13-2019 06:48 PM




Originally Posted by rob vanharten (Post 4667960)
Jason, I spoke with Jim on Saturday regarding my project. I am sitting around 9.8 right now and would like to get down in the 8.5-8.75 range. I understand this will not be doable with the porting alone but am hoping he can remove as much as possible while helping flow. I will still have to run thicker head gaskets but I am trying to run the thinnest gasket possible after the porting to get me to my desired compression ratio. Jim was thinking he could get them into the upper 120’s while increasing flow. I would be very happy with 10cc’s but a little more would be even better!!

Whats your current bore stroke and head gasket?

rob vanharten 01-13-2019 06:52 PM


Originally Posted by hogie roll (Post 4667962)




Whats your current bore stroke and head gasket?

4.560 bore, 4.375 stroke, .027 gasket, piston is about .025 in the hole.

Baja Rooster 01-13-2019 07:45 PM

Does the quench become an issue at some point?

rob vanharten 01-13-2019 08:11 PM


Originally Posted by Baja Rooster (Post 4667966)
Does the quench become an issue at some point?

Research has shown that in blown applications quench can be basically disregarded. Merc 1075 has a .051 head gasket with the piston being .098 in the hole. It uses a flattop piston as well.

hogie roll 01-13-2019 08:57 PM


Originally Posted by rob vanharten (Post 4667963)

4.560 bore, 4.375 stroke, .027 gasket, piston is about .025 in the hole.

Piston cc?

rob vanharten 01-13-2019 09:10 PM


Originally Posted by hogie roll (Post 4667977)

Piston cc?

flat top with 3cc valve pocket.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.