LS Build: In Progress
#306
Registered
I’m on board if they’re bored and stroked to 454 with ported heads and tunnel rams
Theyll be more efficient than bbc blower motors for sure. But I wouldn’t think they’d be more efficient than an injected big block. They may have a better chamber, but that would be a minor improvement. If you’re talking apples to apples NA motors.
Theyll be more efficient than bbc blower motors for sure. But I wouldn’t think they’d be more efficient than an injected big block. They may have a better chamber, but that would be a minor improvement. If you’re talking apples to apples NA motors.
#307
Registered
Thread Starter
I think we once again missed the point. That 468 blower motor is not something I an competing against. Just a reference to judge against as for accuracy of the dyno I ran on. Thats it. If I wanted to compete with a blower motor than I would compete by either turbo or supercharger/ procharger. Not the case. Its just a reference
#308
Registered
Thread Starter
iron. My block is like 90lb heavier than aluminum ls. Mine all in with exhaust front accessories everything will be in the 600lb range. Exhaust minus risers are even aluminum. Oil cooler is not mounted on engine. Everything on ls is smaller. Crank rods pistons valves heads. It all adds up. And then add though beautiful, but heavy headers, efi intake fuel rails, ecu, distributor etc.
#310
Registered
Thread Starter
I’m on board if they’re bored and stroked to 454 with ported heads and tunnel rams
Theyll be more efficient than bbc blower motors for sure. But I wouldn’t think they’d be more efficient than an injected big block. They may have a better chamber, but that would be a minor improvement. If you’re talking apples to apples NA motors.
Theyll be more efficient than bbc blower motors for sure. But I wouldn’t think they’d be more efficient than an injected big block. They may have a better chamber, but that would be a minor improvement. If you’re talking apples to apples NA motors.