![]() |
Cam recommendations 572 blower
Looking to cam up a 572 dart, hyd. roller, 345 heads Merlin, valves 2.3 I / 1.88 E, procharged 6-12psi, 1400 Dominator, 6500 redlined, 26' 4000 lb. American Offshore catamaran. Guessing around 112, 264 dur, 680-720 lift. Those are just some random suggested specs. IDK. TIA Anyone got a similar setup and love how your cam rolls, let me know what you love and why.
|
Are the 345’s cnc’d or ported? I wouldn’t go to crazy on lift. Duration seems in the ball park. Ck out the comp lobes icdedpple had or has in his 548 builds if you get a chance. If you can’t find the thread via search let me know or he’ll likely chime in.
If you’re heads are stock I think their gonna be a choking point. JMO Just for comparison only but still a good read!! Try and copy and paste. Cam below was one Dan jones spec’d however I don’t believe he went that route… can’t keep up with him! lol. I will say the cams he spec’d and ground for my na 565’s are spot on and very easy on the valvetrain and make awesome power all the way through!!!! https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/374052-tunell-raaammm.html https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...92d1c86ce3.png |
Mild porting done on heads. Plus exhaust raised .0600
|
This is what I ended up with .
Comp cams marine grind. Easy on the valve train. It pushed a mid 80s tank to triple digits. 8# of boost Dart CNC pro 1 heads https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...1cd6d56053.jpg 26' and 4000lbs , thats is going to scream.! |
|
Came so close to buying one of those 26 AO’s for that same reason. Sucken gas and haulin azz! 😳
|
Originally Posted by AsaltWeapon
(Post 4892982)
Looking to cam up a 572 dart, hyd. roller, 345 heads Merlin, valves 2.3 I / 1.88 E, procharged 6-12psi, 1400 Dominator, 6500 redlined, 26' 4000 lb. American Offshore catamaran. Guessing around 112, 264 dur, 680-720 lift. Those are just some random suggested specs. IDK. TIA Anyone got a similar setup and love how your cam rolls, let me know what you love and why.
|
572 ci has 4.5/B x 4.5/S. Hope this helps. If I had 4.375/S, I wouldnt have a 572. Thanks
|
I believe the Chevrolet crate 572 is 4.560 x 4.375, that's why I asked. I think the 4.5 crank is better for a boat and I think it would like a little more cam than a shorter stroke, but it's only my opinion.
|
Originally Posted by GPM
(Post 4893054)
I believe the Chevrolet crate 572 is 4.560 x 4.375, that's why I asked. I think the 4.5 crank is better for a boat and I think it would like a little more cam than a shorter stroke, but it's only my opinion.
Though my readings here on OSO, I think the consensus is that a 4.375" stroke is better for a marine application due to rod angle and prolonged high RPM running. Many here advocate for nothing above a 565 for this very reason. Thanks. Brad. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.